Power Science

The systematic study of power itself—its forms, dynamics, sources, and effects—using scientific methods. Unlike philosophy of power, which speculates, power science aims to observe, measure, and model how power operates in human systems. It asks empirical questions: How do power hierarchies form? What predicts the rise and fall of leaders? How does power corrupt, and can we measure that corruption? It's political science, sociology, and psychology focused with laser intensity on the single most important force in human affairs.

Example: "The book wasn't just history; it was power science, offering a data-driven model for how empires actually rise and why they eventually collapse."

by Dumu The Void March 11, 2026

Might Science

The study of might, force, strength, and raw capability as distinct from institutional or social power. Where power science looks at control and influence, might science looks at the brute capacity to effect change through sheer force—military strength, physical prowess, economic leverage, or technological superiority. It's the science of who can actually do what, regardless of who has the "right" to do it. It acknowledges that in the end, power often rests on a foundation of might.

Example: "The diplomat had all the soft power in the world, but the general understood might science: when the tanks roll in, charm stops mattering."

by Dumu The Void March 11, 2026

Social Sciences of Science

The application of sociological methods and theories to understand science itself as a social phenomenon. This field examines how scientific communities form, how prestige and funding flow through them, how consensus emerges (or fails to), and how social factors influence what gets studied and what gets ignored. It's not judging whether science is "true" but asking: who gets to be a scientist? Which questions are asked? Whose voices are heard? It treats the lab as a tribe and the journal as a ritual space.

Example: "The social sciences of science reveal that the 'lone genius' myth is just that—a myth that obscures the messy, collaborative, socially embedded reality of how discovery actually happens."

by Dumu The Void March 11, 2026

Social Sciences of Scientific Method

A meta-field that turns the tools of social science onto the scientific method itself, treating it not as a timeless, universal procedure but as a historically and culturally specific practice. It asks: How did this particular set of rules for inquiry become the gold standard? How do different disciplines modify the method? What social negotiations happen when results don't fit? It's the study of how scientists actually do science, as opposed to how textbooks say they should, revealing the method as a living, evolving social contract.

Example: "The replication crisis in psychology became a case study for the social sciences of scientific method—showing how the community's norms had failed and needed renegotiation."

by Dumu The Void March 11, 2026

Social Sciences of Epistemology

Perhaps the most reflexive of the meta-fields: using social science to study how societies collectively decide what counts as knowledge in the first place. It examines how epistemological standards—what we accept as evidence, what we consider proof, who we trust as authorities—are shaped by social structures, power relations, and cultural contexts. It reveals that even our most fundamental assumptions about "how we know" are, at least in part, social products rather than pure logical necessities.

Example: "The social sciences of epistemology explain why a medieval peasant and a modern physicist would disagree about what constitutes 'proof' of God—they're operating under entirely different social agreements about knowledge."

by Dumu The Void March 11, 2026

Social Sciences of Logic

The study of how logical systems and reasoning practices are embedded in social contexts and shaped by social forces. While logic presents itself as pure, timeless, and culture-free, the social sciences of logic ask: Who gets taught formal logic? Which logical systems dominate in which societies? How do power dynamics affect what counts as a "valid" argument? It's not denying that logic works, but examining why certain logical forms become privileged while others are marginalized.

Example: "The social sciences of logic reveal that Aristotelian logic dominated Western thought not because it's the only possible logic, but because the social institutions that preserved and taught it had the power to do so."

by Dumu The Void March 11, 2026

Human Sciences of Science

A broader, more humanistic approach to understanding science that draws on history, philosophy, literature, and the arts alongside social science methods. It asks not just how science works socially, but what it means—how it shapes our self-understanding, how it appears in culture, how it feels to be a scientist, how it changes what it means to be human. It's science studies with soul, concerned with the existential and cultural dimensions of the scientific enterprise.

Example: "Her book wasn't just history of physics; it was human sciences of science—exploring how relativity changed not just navigation, but poetry, philosophy, and our sense of place in the cosmos."

by Dumu The Void March 11, 2026