by gojo simp January 5, 2022

Evidence-Based Spirituality, also known as Scientific Spirituality, Evidence-Based Spiritualism and Scientific Spiritualism, is a form of spirituality that seeks the development of a scientific approach on spirituality and the search for spiritual evidences for spirituality, it opposes the notion that evidences are only highly stringent, repeatable, double-blind, peer reviewed, materialism-compatible research, for all phenomena and it believes in "Different Methods for Different Domains" and in Epistemological Pluralism in order to study spiritual phenomena like Near-Death Experiences, Astral Projection, Mediumship, Out-of-body experiences, Spiritual phenomena, Spiritual experiences, spiritual healing, spirits, souls, consciousness, afterlife, extraphysics, extraphysical life, spiritual worlds, other dimensions and so on. Evidence-Based Spirituality also opposes the notions of scientism and neopositivism and it often uses the notions of extraphysicalism, extramaterialism, extranaturalism and spiritualicism for its studies and the separation of spiritual sciences from natural sciences where natural sciences cannot determine spiritual things and it's a thing that only spiritual sciences can actually determine.
"The notion of evidence-based spirituality might be really good in order to counter the material reductionism and the neopositivism inside the spiritual community and scientific community and the development of spiritual sciences and even lead into new discoveries related to spirituality and everything related to it."
by Full Monteirism June 4, 2021

by SuelTameOresuTeMato April 25, 2025

Something evolutionists don't have
Christian man: bro, evolutionists got no evidence on they shit.
Person with iq: yeh ik
Take that you fucker who came up with the top def
Person with iq: yeh ik
Take that you fucker who came up with the top def
by I hate your life for you August 6, 2021

It happened on camera. The day after I said it was happening on camera the police showed up to watch the footage. Everyone I've spoken about publicly has eother been fired or transferred because somebody spoke to BOB (Jordan and then he reference it on his podcast)
Hym "You likely don't care about the evidence. What do you want me to hack the mainframe? Someone already did that and immediately after everyone I spoke about publicly was fired or transferred. That's also the whole you're actively participating in it part. If you're readin this then it's true. But you don't care. You don't like the things I've said so you don't care. You want to control my ability to seek recourse because of 'be nice to retards' and there is no reason for me to try to convince someone who clearly wants it to be true but doesn't what the person it's happening to to be able to seek recourse. It's just spite. You're shit people and you care only about controlling the people you don't like. And there go your reproductive rights because you're not likable people and your political opposition is just like you. They don't like permiscuous women! See how that works shit-head?"
by Hym Iam February 23, 2024

If two vehicles show signs of a collision, and flakes of paint from each vehicle are present on said areas, dat is pretty strong evidents dat they did indeed encounter forcible contact!
by QuacksO December 29, 2023

Shocking or damning evidence that has to the potential to fundamentally affect an outcome, but that the holder can't ever show you.
"He argued he had Carlson evidence proving he did not steal the petty cash from his employer, that he had copies of it, and it would clear his name, but he could never show it to anyone because the only copy was lost."
by JG_in_SB October 30, 2020
