Caplan's approach to his argument is more general than Kim's perspective. He uses his own personal experiences to make a case of why higher
education might not be the best decision for everyone. Along with this time he spent speaks on how social connections are probably the most useful tool from attending a universityyee for a job, these students will be looked at first. y, is possibly not needed for the
future with so many other resources available. He supports breaking out of a system and having options. His final piece in his argument is that access to
education means nothing if students are not learning what they need and want.
drop Caplan's approach to his argument is more general than Kim's perspective. He uses his own personal experiences to make a case of why higher
education might not be the best decision for everyone. Ale spent actors contribute to it. Because of this the measurements, for example tests don't accurately prove that students are no more or less on a subject. Some students know the subject but are not good test takers. Caplan adds up expenses and thinks
people are making bad investments in education. He speaks on tuition and he even goes on to after
college costs. He gives examples on how students through studies and research are not learning the skills needed for the world. He gives pros and cons to both viewpoints. He makes sure to incorporate extra curricular activities, and basic scientific research. He makes a point on the economy today as well.Caplan makes it clear
people and life is evolving and in his
opinion what is being provided curre