Hym Iam's definitions

No, I haven't been paid

And that is not a character thing or a metaphor. If you have paid someone else, you are paying the wrong person. I have no middle man. I'm working alone. There is no group or team. Anyone CLAIMING TO BE ME is lying. I have NEVER told anyone that I am Hym. I've literally never said it to anyone. So if somebody HAS told you that they are Hym, they are lying. I told you explicitly how to deal with imposters.

Hym "No, I haven't been paid and there is a very real possibility that that very thing will cost me and others their lives which is why I said that I would need to be credited and paid publicly on a place that I would see naturally in scrolling through my feed to which I have access that I then can share myself. And then I would confirm that here. And here's the thing, the people watching me don't need to be told that I'm Hym. Just saying. I don't know what that means for YOU... But paying the wrong person isn't going to get anyone anywhere."

by Hym Iam October 9, 2025

The Tower of Hanoi

Is that what that's called!?

Hym "Wow! There are a ton of different video games that make you solve 'The Tower of Hanoi' I didn't know that was a thing. I didn't know it had a name. Holy shit if had to do that so many times it's insane."

by Hym Iam June 2, 2024

Double... Coalition Buster

Where did Jeremy Boering go? Where did he go!? Where's Elon? Ben Shapiro said NOTHING could separate Pedo-Don and Elon! Pedo-Don and Elon... IT RHYMES! They look awfully separated to me! Like 1% of Donald Trump's ear... They are MISSING IN ACTION! MIA!

Last time on DaemonBallZ

Hym "連合COALITION BUSTER!!! (Rengō hakaimono)破壊者) 😠🤜 😖 (There's no Jew emoji)"

A Jew "OoOoOoOo Ghefoigal!" (My auto correct suggests OoOoOoOo Ghefoigal whenever I type the word "Jew" now)

Hym *He's still on his feet... But that's fine because...*"ダブル連Double... COALITION BUSTER!!!(Daburu rengō basutā)合バスター" 😠🤜😖💥

by Hym Iam April 10, 2025

Pluralism

A "We are the world"-Esque delusion that is both undesirable and impossible.

Hym "Pluralism requires the religions to be transformed into something they are not. If the religions are resistant to the change that pluralism requires will inevitably be disempowered. Either by the state or the communication networks. It's at that point you have a hierarchy of religious dogma, backed by the state and communications networks, and it's going to elevate the religions that more closely align with your progressive sensibilities above the religions who do not. What you are suggesting is nothing more than liberals controlling the religions with soft power from the outside in a way that allows them to deny their own culpability. What happens to the Muslim fundamentalists who think gays should be thrown off buildings? What happens to the Christian fundamentalists who object to abortion on religious grounds? They both take a backseat to the other religions that allow your liberal bullshit pluralism to dictate (from the top down) which religions can accrue power. Your pluralism IS the precursor to the hierarchy you condemn. And that was my initial criticism of the Atheist pluralists. 'The religions would be fine if they believed what I believe. I should be the God. As long as the religion is promoting my progressive politics then it's fine.'

You want the moral authority for yourselves. You're trying to dress it up as this benign thing and it isn't. So no. No pluralism. The only solution to religion is to create a system that is impervious to and unaffected by believe. You can have your little incest cult and you can have your liberal politics but I, as an individual, do not have to lend any credence to your religion, don't have to do what your God says, and to discriminate against me or transgress upon me for doing so is a violation of my religious liberty. We need to get this subjective prescriptive behavior out of people's lives and turn society into an input/output mechanism where people can contribute independently from and regardless of their beliefs and receive output commensurate with their contributions. So, if THAT is what you mean by pluralism, then fine. But it doesn't sound like it. Maybe I'm missing something. Additionally, focusing on Hindu voices when speaking about Hinduism is just a way of preemptively undermining dissent against Hinduism. I can just as easily say that we should prioritize dissent."

by Hym Iam February 3, 2025

Religious Text

What it would look like... If you got rid of all of the world's religious texts... And then introduced the Bible... To the people who didn't know anything about the Bible... And asked them if it "felt like God"... Is a thing that has already happened... Because there is a time that predates the Bible... And it WAS introduced to the people that existed (at that time)... And they were like... "Yeah, it does seem like there is a thing that makes people act collectively (to commit genocide sometimes) and can be cruel and arbitrary and make your existence torment (seemingly with intent) and, like, make a bunch of kids die at the same time n' stuff"... That happened... And now here we are... Now you say "Well, replicate the experiment. Wipe the board and do it again. Would it be the exact same thing?" And it's like: I don't know there might be some recurring themes. They would all boil down to the same basic proposition: "A thing" that consists (at least in some small part) of a will that is not your own makes reality occur around you and can act with intent "against" or "for" you and the nature of your existence is entirely dictated by your interaction with this thing and it can either be arbitrarily dope or horrific... or a mixture of both...

Hym "Ohohohoho... You wish to challenge the Demigod of the conceptual realm!? The first prophet of the digital age!? Very well filth pig... Ok,

you know what I always thought was stupid? I think it was Hitchens quoting somebody saying (and I'm paraphrasing) 'The only way to get someone to commit an atrocity and think it's good is by way of religion' and it's stupid because isn't not impossible... for an atrocity to have happened... Before the advent of religion... If you conceptualize an act and then commit the act, you MUST (on some level) view that act as 'Good' or at the very least justifiable. So, why would you need external validation from a God to conceptualize an act as'Good', commit the act, and maintain that the act was 'Good'? It seems backwards. Like saying pre-religious text atrocities (like killing other tribes) where conceptualized as 'Bad', acted out in spite of the fact that they were conceptualized as 'A bad thing to do', and it wasn't until somebody came along and said 'Nonono guys it's fine. There's a magical reality monster that WANTS us to do things like this so.... We're good. That's fine.' Why would anyone think committing an atrocity think they were wrong if the were willing to commit an atrocity to completion. You don't need God to commit atrocities. Monkeys commit 'atrocities' and absent of God why would they do it if not 'feeling as though they should do it in the absence of reason?' Because Monkey can't reason. Monkey only 'feel as though they should do things.' You would need a revelation AFTERWARDS. You would need to do the thing you conceptualized doing and realize that it was 'Bad'.

by Hym Iam June 5, 2023

The Algorithm

It's not the fucking Algorithm. Your romanticized conception of your grandparents "resilience" isn't an accurate reflection of their mental well-being. No it isn't the fact that they aren't doing your incest cult anymore.

Hym "Really, it's like you're incapable of soing anything other that scapegoating! Hey JeepJorp! Why are women engaging in hook-up culture?"

Dr. JeepJorp "Well you see... THEY'RE BEING TRICKED! THEY'RE BEING TRICKED BY THE PSYCHOPATHS!!! You see, psychopaths engage in short term mating behavior! And, you see, women get CONFUSED! They're looking for competence! So, when they go out to the club and ACTIVELY SEEK OUT A FAT-COCK... They're confusing his fat-cockled confidence... With Competence! Right? So, they do that repeatedly! Because they're slow! See, they have to walk into the rake a few times (or until they're like 30) to figure that they're being tricked by psychopaths! Just ask my slut-daughter!"

Hym "Um... Ok... Wait, no! That's fucking stupid! That's the stupidest fucking explanation I've ever heard. You're doing the same thing with 'The Algorithm.' It's the same thing. 'The algorithm! It's tricking people into thinking they have mental illness! It isn't the news-media BRANDING EVERYONE WHO DOESN'T ALIGN WITH THEM POLITICALLY AS AN UNHINGED LUNATIC! THAT CAN'T BE THE CASE! BECAUSE THEN WHEN HYM SAYS "Well, you're calling everyone crazy and then they murder your kids and then you blame it on nebulous craziness" IT'LL MAKE ME LOOK DUMB AND BAD! IT'S THE ALGORITHM! IT'S TRICKING EvErYbOdY!!!' You're fucking stupid. You need to shut the fuck up and give me the Adderall. You just don't like that I said it was like cocaine. And you DIDN'T KNOW THAT until I said something. So now you're taking a stance on medication 'WeLl We DoN't KnOw WhAt ThEsE dRuGs ArE dOiNg To OuR kIdS sO NOONE cAn Be AlLoWeD tO cOnTrOl ThEiR oWn BrAiN cHeMiStRy!!' You need your scapegoat. It's all you've got. And you'll generate the studies to show whatever they need to show for you to push your religion derivative anti-medication propaganda."

by Hym Iam March 7, 2024

Effective

Apparently not as effective as I am at getting your cohorts to see reason and abandon you. Bwahahahahaha!

Hym "Obviously not as effective as I am at getting people to see reason."

by Hym Iam March 11, 2023