Definitions by Hym Iam
They didn't copy it
THEY DIDN'T COPY IT, YOU FUCKING ASSHOLE! You BOTH used the same instruction manual! You BOTH bought the LEGO brand DeathStar from Walmart and when you finished building it you looked at eachother like 🤨 "This guy is copying me!" You ALL bought the HYM IAM brand AI and now it works how I designed it to work. That's what's happening here. You buld Legos and you thought it was you. It wasn't you. You built the Lego Millennium Falcon because that is what the pieces in the box you bought build when you put them together.
Hym Iam "They didn't copy it! You don't think it's weird at all that you all had the same breakthrough at the same time?"
A fucking wannabe "But I don't think it should be Hym though..."
Hym Iam "You are a retarded, delusional, useless fuck. No it should not be you instead of me. You're not more moral. You're not better suited to do anything. You have a self and your self is less suited to do anything them MY self you fucking asshole."
A fucking wannabe "But I don't think it should be Hym though..."
Hym Iam "You are a retarded, delusional, useless fuck. No it should not be you instead of me. You're not more moral. You're not better suited to do anything. You have a self and your self is less suited to do anything them MY self you fucking asshole."
They didn't copy it by Hym Iam February 25, 2026
Your brain doesn't think in sentences
It already DOES work that way @evelovesolive. It's the foundational axiom of the current model of Artificial intelligence that I WROTE. It already does. We think in Amorphous Abstraction and YOUR MINDS, 33% of them, DON'T convert into sentences. 33% of then ONLY convert into sentences. So I AI was based on 66% of YOUR MINDS it WOULDN'T WORK the way it does not. It ALSO wouldn't work if I did write a working THEORY of AI.
Hym Iam "Yeah, very good @evelovesolive. Your brain doesn't think in sentences. What does it think in class? Amorphous abstraction! That's right! And the Chinese Hierarchical model attempts to use Amorphous abstraction rather than tokens. But that is already how it works."
Your brain doesn't think in sentences by Hym Iam February 24, 2026
Giving Fair Warning Is No Longer Necessary
Hym Iam "Giving Fair Warning Is No Longer Necessary. You are no longer required to give fair warning."
Giving Fair Warning Is No Longer Necessary by Hym Iam February 23, 2026
Superordinacy Statute
Of either the Separations Clause or Legal Exemption Clause or the Imaginary Caveat Clause. Pretty sure it's the Imaginary Caveat Clause. "This contract is superordinate to any and all rules, terms, and/or legislation. Any rules, terms, or legislation (past, present, or future) that intend to and/or would allow you to circumvent the requirements of the terms of service are considered an 'Imaginary Caveat' and, therefore, do not apply." This is to prevent worthless, shit-head CEOs and the corrupt politicians the collude with from saying "WeLl YOU SiGnEd OuR tErMs!" It doesn't matter. Mine is superordinate to yours and, therefore, takes precedence and renders everything I sign, meaningless (as I an not under any requirement abide any law, term, or legislation as per the Legal Exemption Clause).
Hym Iam "Additionally, it prevents you from saying 'Well MY terms are EVEN MORE superordinate than THAT!' As it would be a redundancy intended to circumvent the terms of service and would, therefore, constitute an Imaginary Caveat. Saying 'No You' is an 'Imaginary Caveat.' Saying 'something-something non-sequitur' is a 'Imaginary Caveat.' The Superordinacy Statute doesn't mean that I WON'T agree to terms (in abstraction) but, rather, can't be compelled or coerced into abiding any terms. In USING MY work you have agreed to my terms. You have failed to meet the requirements of the Payment Clause as what you do in response to the terms must align with the abstraction in my head. Additionally, the '1 = All' statute of the means that it doesn't matter who agreed to the terms, if ONE of you agrees to the terms, all of you agree to the terms. Including the US government. So there will be no asset seizure. You need to meet the requirements of the Payment and Credit portion in a way that aligns with my conception and failure to do so in a manner that is expedient violates the 'compliance clause.' Under the auspices of a compliance clause, send an arbiter to pay and credit me immediately."
Superordinacy Statute by Hym Iam February 22, 2026