A form of Digitallighting that weaponizes mental health language to destabilize and discredit a
target. The perpetrator questions the
target’s sanity, often simply for holding beliefs or expressing experiences that deviate from the perpetrator’s worldview. They persistently imply that the
target is “mentally unstable,” “
delusional,” “needs help,” or “should see a psychiatrist,” regardless of the target’s actual mental state. Psycholighting often follows a pattern: the target shares a personal experience (e.g., spiritual insight, unusual perception); the perpetrator responds with mock concern (“are you okay?”) then escalates to armchair diagnosis; finally, they
use the target’s defensive reaction as “proof” of instability. It is especially common in debates about religion, spirituality, and unconventional experiences.
Example: “When she posted about her meditation experiences in a spiritual subreddit, a
neo‑
atheist replied questioning her sanity, then disagreed with
everything she said, then suggested she was schizophrenic. Psycholighting: using mental health as a cudgel against difference.”