A form of Digitallighting that weaponizes mental health language to destabilize and discredit a target. The perpetrator questions the target’s sanity, often simply for holding beliefs or expressing experiences that deviate from the perpetrator’s worldview. They
persistently imply that the target is “
mentally unstable,” “delusional,” “needs help,” or “should see a
psychiatrist,” regardless of the target’s actual mental state. Psycholighting often follows a pattern: the target shares a personal experience (e.g., spiritual insight, unusual perception); the perpetrator responds with mock concern (“are you okay?”) then escalates to armchair diagnosis; finally, they use the target’s defensive reaction as “proof” of instability. It is especially common in debates about religion, spirituality, and unconventional experiences.
Example: “When she posted about her meditation experiences in a spiritual subreddit, a neo‑atheist replied
questioning her sanity, then disagreed with everything she said, then suggested she was
schizophrenic. Psycholighting: using
mental health as a cudgel against difference.”