The principle that for any argument, it is possible to interpret it as fallacious—there is always some way to apply a fallacy label, regardless of the argument's actual merit. The law acknowledges that fallacy-mongering is infinite: given enough creativity, you can find an ad hominem, a straw man, a slippery slope in any discourse. This possibility doesn't mean all arguments are fallacious; it means fallacy labeling is not objective. It's a rhetorical move, not a logical judgment. The law of the possible fallacies warns against the weaponization of fallacy terminology—just because you can call something a fallacy doesn't mean it is one.
Example: "He could find a fallacy in any argument, no matter how sound. Straw man? You're oversimplifying. Ad hominem? You're attacking the person. Slippery slope? You're predicting disaster. The law of the possible fallacies explained: it's always possible to see a fallacy if you want to. The question was whether the fallacy was real or just his imagination."
by Dumu The Void February 17, 2026
Get the Law of the Possible Fallacies mug.Related Words
Law of the Possible Fallacies • Law of the Possible Ad Hoc • Law of the Possible Middle • Law of the Possible Middle Truth • Law of the Absolute and Relative Ad Hocs • Law of the Absolute and Relative Fallacies • Law of the Ad Hoc Possibility • Law of the Ad Hoc Validity • Law of the Contextual Third • law of the dick