A meta-fallacy where, instead of refuting an argument, one simply asserts it contains a logical fallacy and then shifts the entire discussion into a pedantic meta-debate about fallacies. The goal is to win by default—by moving the goalposts to a terrain of technical rhetoric where you can accuse your opponent of being "illogical," thus avoiding the original, often uncomfortable, point. It's a tactic of rhetorical jiu-jitsu used by those who can't win on substance.
Example: "You: 'The policy has hurt low-income families, here's the data.' Opponent: 'That's just an argumentum ad misericordiam! You're appealing to pity!' This is Fallaverism—they've declared a fallacy and forced you into a defensive debate about logic textbooks, while the data on family suffering goes unaddressed."
church hurt is where you experience a degree of distance, pain, or judgement from your church community. Essentially, you are just unable to “find your place”. This is prevalent in the Christian community, but can be extended to other religions.
Now that I am an adult I am beginning to heal from the church hurt that was inflicted on me as a child.
when you're holding up your phone and making faces at it, as though you are taking a selfie, but you're really taking a picture of the person across from you or the wall or anything else that seems interesting but you don't want to be caught dead taking a picture of.
This action is often made more convincing by wiggling the eyebrows or opening the mouth, to pretend you're trying to get a Snapchat filter to work.