Generally used in the negative to refer to someone who lacks deal factor. It is the quality where people can deal with changes in plan, changes in circumstances, without going above threshold or overreacting.
John? He’s got like no deal factor. We changed the time for brunch by 15 minutes and he freaked out.
by Blider March 19, 2025
Get the deal factor mug.If you use Two Factor Authentication you have a death wish as you will never get back in if you don’t have your phone number.
by Trashmenger August 11, 2024
Get the Two Factor Authentication mug.According to AI
1. Purpose and Character of the Use: This factor considers whether the use is transformative, meaning it adds new meaning, purpose, or message to the original work. Uses like criticism, commentary, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, or research are generally favored. Commercial uses are viewed less favorably, but not automatically ruled out as fair use, according to Emerson College Library.
2. Nature of the Copyrighted Work: The nature of the copyrighted work plays a role. Factual or public documents are more likely to be considered fair use than creative works. For example, using factual information from a book in a news article might be fair use, but using a large portion of a creative novel in a new work might be less likely to be fair use.
3. Amount and Substantiality of the Portion Used: This factor looks at how much of the original work is used. Generally, the less used, the better. Courts also consider whether the portion used is the "heart" of the original work. Using only a small portion or a non-essential part is more likely to be fair use, according to Emory Libraries.
4. Effect of the Use on the Market: This factor considers whether the use harms the market for the original work or any potential markets for it. If the use directly competes with the original work or could potentially harm its future sales, it's less likely to be fair use, according to the University of Washington.
1. Purpose and Character of the Use: This factor considers whether the use is transformative, meaning it adds new meaning, purpose, or message to the original work. Uses like criticism, commentary, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, or research are generally favored. Commercial uses are viewed less favorably, but not automatically ruled out as fair use, according to Emerson College Library.
2. Nature of the Copyrighted Work: The nature of the copyrighted work plays a role. Factual or public documents are more likely to be considered fair use than creative works. For example, using factual information from a book in a news article might be fair use, but using a large portion of a creative novel in a new work might be less likely to be fair use.
3. Amount and Substantiality of the Portion Used: This factor looks at how much of the original work is used. Generally, the less used, the better. Courts also consider whether the portion used is the "heart" of the original work. Using only a small portion or a non-essential part is more likely to be fair use, according to Emory Libraries.
4. Effect of the Use on the Market: This factor considers whether the use harms the market for the original work or any potential markets for it. If the use directly competes with the original work or could potentially harm its future sales, it's less likely to be fair use, according to the University of Washington.
Hym "1. I definitely have an interpretation that adds new meaning (at least as it pertains to the parts of the bible and more broadly Jordan Peterson's work) and I definitely added a new message. Used like criticism. ✔️
2. I use factual work mostly or work put forth as factual. I'll plug some creative work or even use quotes. And I DEFINITELY USE NEWS ARTICLES! That's for sure! ✔️
3. Not much actually. Usually never more than a proposition. But you can't really say Jordan is using Nietzsches work in the "heart." Therefore, my work is in the same "heart" as Jordan's in that regard (all be it in the opposite direction) And you can't say the same about you using MY work because the "heart" of MY work is A. shedding light on the targeted harassment that mirrors the delusions of reference commonly associated with schizophrenia I've been subjected to since I was 19 (or sooner) and remediation of this harassment WHICH NONE OF THE MOVIES OR SHOWS ADDRESS AND HAS ONLY GOTTEN WORSE. B. (And I'm quoting myself here) "Demonstrating my abject superiority to all men, women, and children." Which none of this does. The Anime gets a pass but the rest of you don't. C. Getting myself credit AND MONEY for creating AI. I was explicit. ✔️ for me and not for you.
4 factors part 1.
2. I use factual work mostly or work put forth as factual. I'll plug some creative work or even use quotes. And I DEFINITELY USE NEWS ARTICLES! That's for sure! ✔️
3. Not much actually. Usually never more than a proposition. But you can't really say Jordan is using Nietzsches work in the "heart." Therefore, my work is in the same "heart" as Jordan's in that regard (all be it in the opposite direction) And you can't say the same about you using MY work because the "heart" of MY work is A. shedding light on the targeted harassment that mirrors the delusions of reference commonly associated with schizophrenia I've been subjected to since I was 19 (or sooner) and remediation of this harassment WHICH NONE OF THE MOVIES OR SHOWS ADDRESS AND HAS ONLY GOTTEN WORSE. B. (And I'm quoting myself here) "Demonstrating my abject superiority to all men, women, and children." Which none of this does. The Anime gets a pass but the rest of you don't. C. Getting myself credit AND MONEY for creating AI. I was explicit. ✔️ for me and not for you.
4 factors part 1.
by Hym Iam April 11, 2025
Get the 4 Factors mug.4. Effect of the Use on the Market: This factor considers whether the use harms the market for the original work or any potential markets for it. If the use directly competes with the original work or could potentially harm its future sales, it's less likely to be fair use, according to the University of Washington.
Hym "As far as the 4th factor: Does this harm the market for the original works I used? No. Everyone who's work I've used has been or had elevated politically or economically. The net worth of Urban Dictionary increased by 800%. Jordan Peterson has ascended to golden prophet of the right wing and gain millions of followers. Does this harm the market for my original work? Yes. It launders off all my best ideas without giving me credit and the AI companies does directly compete with me by using my revelations about AI to steal credit from me. Do I compete with Jordan Peterson? No. Because this isn't self help. It's self-immolation. An op-ed and autobiographical hypertext where I muse on various propositions permeating the zeitgeist write skits and dialoue. Social, cultural, and political analysis. And ANTI-HARASSMENT THAT MIRRORS THE DELUSIONS OF REFERENCE COMMONLY ASSOCIATED WITH SCHIZOPHRENIA ACTIVISM THROUGH PERFORMANCE ART. I also insult and threaten people but only to draw attention and provoke action in regard to the continued surveillance, harassment, and theft I've been subjected to over the 10-15 years and have said on several occasions not to do anything I haven't actually done."
by Hym Iam April 11, 2025
Get the 4th factor mug.When correlation doesn't equal causation, people tend to make the mistake of skipping from factor A to B. That missing third ever-so-absent variable of the logic chain is C.
"A is correlated with B. Therefore A leads to B."
No, both "A" and "B" are related to "C". It's Factor C.
"A is correlated with B. Therefore A leads to B."
No, both "A" and "B" are related to "C". It's Factor C.
Person 1: "People who have lighters in their pockets are far more likely to develop lung cancer. Obviously, lighters lead to lung cancer, it's just simple A-to-B logic."
Person 2: "Factor C: Smoking... Are you actually retarded?"
Person 2: "Factor C: Smoking... Are you actually retarded?"
by anonymous April 15, 2025
Get the Factor C mug.<.7.9.7.6.>as an Air sign you are good at adapting to new situations and that will be a factor in your favor over the coming year. Others may be worried by the frenzied pace of change but for you it will be exciting and full of opportunity<.7.9.7.6.>
<.7.9.7.6.>as an Air sign you are good at adapting to new situations and that will be a factor in your favor over the coming year. Others may be worried by the frenzied pace of change but for you it will be exciting and full of opportunity<.7.9.7.6.>
by IPromiseToDoWhatIPromised June 3, 2025
Get the <.7.9.7.6.>as an Air sign you are good at adapting to new situations and that will be a factor in your favor over the coming year. Others may be worried by the frenzied pace of change but for you it will be exciting and full of opportunity<.7.9.7.6.> mug.A play of words Using Stockton Rush'es Sir name, his impatient draw to explore Titanic's captivating allure, by using an insufficient and budget friendly version of the "Limiting Factor" and is describing "when someone leaves all rhyme or reason aside to achieve something or to prove a point, even though it come with a great risk to oneself or others" / To have the "Rush factor" - Erik Bong Nilsson, July 2023
by C B Nilsson July 8, 2023
Get the Rush factor mug.