Skip to main content

Radicalism

It's radical just more rad. ULTRA-RAD
Yo, that tree is so "radicalism".
by palinthemouse May 29, 2023
mugGet the Radicalism mug.

reDICKulus

The actions of a man under the influence of his dick.
He hollered out at me and got totally reDICKulus!
by unusual princess September 15, 2023
mugGet the reDICKulus mug.

Redicuseless

When a mans dick becomes useless to a woman.
The woman noticed that her mans penis couldnt get hard and she said your "redicuseless".
by JMEBEAR January 19, 2026
mugGet the Redicuseless mug.

Radicalis Es Fallacy

A fallacy where someone dismisses all arguments of a person by labeling them "radical," "extremist," or "fringe." The label functions as a dismissal: if you're radical, nothing you say needs engagement. The fallacy lies in treating the label as refutation—as if calling someone radical proves their arguments wrong. But radical doesn't mean false; it means outside the mainstream. The mainstream can be wrong; radicals can be right. The fallacy is particularly insidious because it uses social position as epistemic judgment—confusing marginality with falsity.
"I presented a critique of economic inequality. Response: 'That's just radical leftist nonsense.' That's Radicalis Es Fallacy—dismissing by label, not by argument. Maybe it's radical; maybe it's right. The label doesn't settle it. Calling me radical avoids engaging what I actually said. It's ad hominem by political category."
by Dumu The Void March 2, 2026
mugGet the Radicalis Es Fallacy mug.

Hoc Est Radicalismus Fallacy

A fallacy where someone dismisses arguments by labeling them "radical," "extremist," or "fringe." The label functions as social dismissal: if it's radical, it's outside acceptable discourse and doesn't need engagement. The fallacy lies in treating marginality as falsity, ignoring that many truths were once radical and that social position doesn't determine correctness. It's argument from respectability—confusing what's acceptable with what's true.
"I proposed significant structural changes to address inequality. Response: 'That's just radical extremism.' That's Hoc Est Radicalismus Fallacy—using the label as a dismissal, not engaging the proposal. Maybe it's radical; maybe it's what's needed. The label doesn't tell you; thinking does. But labeling avoids thinking."
by Dumu The Void March 2, 2026
mugGet the Hoc Est Radicalismus Fallacy mug.

Share this definition

Sign in to vote

We'll email you a link to sign in instantly.

Or

Check your email

We sent a link to

Open your email