Getting to third base is the most ambiguous stage of high-school heterosexual interaction. The definition really depends on how far the boy goes: is it an intermediate stage followed by going all the way, or is it the final stage of making out? (everything that follows is from the boy's perspective) When I was a kid (mid-70s) it meant groping skin-to-skin instead of through the clothes. Today it's gone farther: "getting to third" implies that you eventually squirted; "I got as far as third" means that you didn't do it inside her (hand job, blow job, dry-hump, just lose it while making out, etc.). If you go all the way, it doesn't really matter when you got to third.
"How far did you go?"
"Third base, dude! She wouldn't drop her panties, but we kept at it until I spooged my boxers."
"Third base, dude! She wouldn't drop her panties, but we kept at it until I spooged my boxers."
by e-boy February 19, 2007
when two women make a plan to rape a fat man but half way through the rape the women start fucking each other while the fat man jacks off while watching them
by squidworth May 02, 2009
by trevorhardin June 21, 2014
Person 1: My cat just just got a tracheostomy.
Person 2: So did you get to seventh base with it yet?
Person 2: So did you get to seventh base with it yet?
by itGoesInTheButt October 21, 2009
by Huggi May 21, 2021
by motorboat 'em April 07, 2014
A politically correct way of saying that the government is going to give tax-payer's money to religious groups so they can use it to persue their religious agenda.
'Faith-based initiative' sounds less threatening than 'religious school' and so is less likely to scare people. This phrase is increasingly being used in the US and the UK.
'Faith-based initiative' sounds less threatening than 'religious school' and so is less likely to scare people. This phrase is increasingly being used in the US and the UK.
Tony Blair: I think faith-based schools will benefit our children.
Journalist: So you're saying that you want to let religious organisations educate our children so they can learn that evolution and creationism are equally valid?
Tony Blair: They will receive a balanced education.
Journalist: So it's okay for children to be taught to doubt evolution and consider the earth to have been created within the last 10,000 years by a god? All this at the tax-payer's expense.
Tony Blair: Next question please.
Journalist: So you're saying that you want to let religious organisations educate our children so they can learn that evolution and creationism are equally valid?
Tony Blair: They will receive a balanced education.
Journalist: So it's okay for children to be taught to doubt evolution and consider the earth to have been created within the last 10,000 years by a god? All this at the tax-payer's expense.
Tony Blair: Next question please.
by thepreacher April 27, 2006