by Thedude85 October 12, 2021
Get the Edible smashed mug.person A: hey, did you saw the new edit of *xy*
person B: yeah, but nothing compares to @editsstiles!
person B: yeah, but nothing compares to @editsstiles!
by lk12345 January 19, 2022
Get the editsstiles mug.An urban dictonary client who has singend up to urbandictonary.com and has the ability to review definitions before they get put up on the website.
by i am #2 September 25, 2011
Get the an ud editor mug.Fuck you editor, tell me why you won't publish my Orlando definition. You guys are fucking hack queers, go sit on a dick dip shit
by Fuck you editor 1 January 10, 2014
Get the Fuck you editor mug.by darkedge008 May 15, 2018
Get the I fucked the Volunteer editors mother mug.The act of Wikipedian editors "cancelling" wikipedia edits that are from anonymous contributors.
"Good Faith Edits" is an unfortunate methodology used by Wikipedia editors to erase the contributions of anyone who they deem is "uncredentialed" or anonymous. It is lazy editing by editors who wield absolute power, WITHOUT exercising good faith due diligence, to VERIFY the quality and importance of edits!
"Good Faith Edits" is basically a cynical netizen initiative to ensure Wikipedia is no longer a truly open source resource. So Wikipedia is becoming a resource where an arbitrary handful of people get to decide what gets published and what does not. Editors have absolute power in determining what is "relevant", and what isn't.
Basically, "Good Faith Edits" are proof technology that used to assume "good faith" egalitarianism on the part of all users, is moving towards a broader cybernetic fascist goal.
"Good Faith Edits" is an unfortunate methodology used by Wikipedia editors to erase the contributions of anyone who they deem is "uncredentialed" or anonymous. It is lazy editing by editors who wield absolute power, WITHOUT exercising good faith due diligence, to VERIFY the quality and importance of edits!
"Good Faith Edits" is basically a cynical netizen initiative to ensure Wikipedia is no longer a truly open source resource. So Wikipedia is becoming a resource where an arbitrary handful of people get to decide what gets published and what does not. Editors have absolute power in determining what is "relevant", and what isn't.
Basically, "Good Faith Edits" are proof technology that used to assume "good faith" egalitarianism on the part of all users, is moving towards a broader cybernetic fascist goal.
"Dang! I anonymously added some birthdays of Pulitzer and Nobel prize winners to Wikipedia. But because it was anonymous, it violated the arbitrarily new "Good Faith Edits" code, so they removed all my contributions! Without even bothering to actually vet the quality of my edits, they proclaim I was acting in "bad faith", and THEY are the ones doing "Good Faith Editing"!
by RonoMacco April 1, 2022
Get the Good Faith Edits mug.