Abused by technology : users being stalked by algorithyms to benefit an app creator or advertisers. taking advantage of users by showing them "eye candy". This technique allows the user to be distracted while trying to complete a task at hand, advertisement displayed is sure to pique the interest of the user and take them away from their priority task.
For most websites, the user is interacting with Bots as they seek assistance, not a human. If a bot communicates to users in the wrong context it is therefore, not a human to blame. Robots do mislead users to buy plug ins they don't need, for example as it is an upsell. Beneficial for the Corporate Giant. Not the user.
When the Corporate Giants of tech are allowing algorythms to trick thier users, not correcting falsified information given by bots, withdrawing money from users accounts, and not providing the service in which was intended, falsifying reality to our young and all the while the ones employed there don't allow thier children on thier own sites...it is Technologically abusive.
Taking advantage of humans, using their weaknesses, depriving users of personal accounts approx 10 days due to a lack of adequate staff. Humans using Robots to do thier dirty work to other humans. In some cases, tech giants are collecting money from accounts that they know the user has not used. They monitize and can see and hear you at all times ..they are taking your money the robots will then take blame.
For most websites, the user is interacting with Bots as they seek assistance, not a human. If a bot communicates to users in the wrong context it is therefore, not a human to blame. Robots do mislead users to buy plug ins they don't need, for example as it is an upsell. Beneficial for the Corporate Giant. Not the user.
When the Corporate Giants of tech are allowing algorythms to trick thier users, not correcting falsified information given by bots, withdrawing money from users accounts, and not providing the service in which was intended, falsifying reality to our young and all the while the ones employed there don't allow thier children on thier own sites...it is Technologically abusive.
Taking advantage of humans, using their weaknesses, depriving users of personal accounts approx 10 days due to a lack of adequate staff. Humans using Robots to do thier dirty work to other humans. In some cases, tech giants are collecting money from accounts that they know the user has not used. They monitize and can see and hear you at all times ..they are taking your money the robots will then take blame.
Not only have I had to deal with the realism of a pandemic, but being left with no cell service or computer for 10 straight months, after enduring physical, psycological, emotional and mental abuse. I get back to civilization to realize the worst is just beginning as now i am being "technoligically abused and I actually think technological abuse is the worst form of abuse yet! How are we enforcing ZERO TOLERANCE CYBER BULLYING ? Whomever surfs the net is contradicting thier anti bullying belief, because we are ALL actually supporting it! Algarithyms are corporate giant bullies.
by Bobby cyn Waugh August 09, 2021
i heard that logan is a mii abuser
by bruh please March 05, 2021
Like 'Pay Per Click' and 'Cost Per Click, 'Abuse Per Spam' refers to the rate of abuse one goes through because of internal spamming. Internal spamming is all about colleagues sending unwanted and unsolicited information to each other.
by KSS007 August 23, 2011
Alexa abuse is acts of discrimination towards people with the name; Alexandria, or Alexandra who go by the nickname Alexa.
Person: Lmao! Your so stupid
Alexa: Is this Alexa abuse
_________________________________________
Person: Ur srsly so ugly
Alexa: Alexa abuse much?
Alexa: Is this Alexa abuse
_________________________________________
Person: Ur srsly so ugly
Alexa: Alexa abuse much?
by luluwazhere January 27, 2023
Substance abuse disorder should be abbreviated as sad, where sad is a noun. I don't suffer from sad.
by Sexydimma June 03, 2023
Similar to the infamous "reverse identity theft" strategy that a dishonest/selfish person uses in an attempt to avoid responsibility/prosecution for a crime that he did indeed commit, this type of sleazeball irrelevantly mentions the National "Do Not Call" Registry anytime he wishes to avoid having to deal with business/complaints which the local authorities or other 100%-legitimate parties have phoned him about and are attempting to discuss with him.
A National "Do Not Call" List abuser pretends that he honestly believes that any caller whom he doesn't want to talk to (cops, angry neighbors/businessmen, bill/tax-collectors, etc.) is just a nameless telemarketer in disguise, and who is merely posing as the real authority-figure who actually **is** needing to discuss some urgent/serious matter with him. This "Excuse me, but I don't believe that you're really ___; I suspect that you're just claiming that in an attempt to sell me something or pressure me into listening to your long-winded/hard-sell sales-pitch. I am on the National 'Do Not Call' list; please remove my name from your mailing-list" strategy can often be surprisingly effective, especially since many telemarketers and crank-callers actually **do** falsely identify themselves as a wronged individual or authority-figure in an attempt to compel the person whom they call to listen to them and/or be upset/intimidated, and so it is indeed conceivable that someone might automatically suspect that the unwelcome caller was merely an impersonator, especially if the person answering the phone had supposedly been of innocent mind and therefore had not expected to be contacted by anyone in authority.
by QuacksO December 17, 2017