the act of following links through the website "Wikipedia" for an extended period of time (usually through various subjects)
Generally used as a noun
Generally used as a noun
I was going to attend my classes, but I got caught up in a Wikipedia daisy chain that was far more interesting and informative.
by Cenizo October 21, 2009
Get the Wikipedia Daisy Chain mug.by Supertrooper6969 November 24, 2010
Get the Wikipenis mug.Related Words
The Wikipedia Effect is the tendancy for inquisitive people to become caught in an endless series of pages on the popular open-encyclopedia, "Wikipedia", to which they are forced to read every single page they've opened.
This tends to happen thanks to Wikipedia's inter-linking model, which links important words in a particular article, to an entire article on that word. The trend can then easily cascade from there, ending in dozens of pages that a user finds interesting.
This tends to happen thanks to Wikipedia's inter-linking model, which links important words in a particular article, to an entire article on that word. The trend can then easily cascade from there, ending in dozens of pages that a user finds interesting.
by ceosion December 24, 2008
Get the The Wikipedia Effect mug.Teacher: "Okay kids, I want you to write a history of World War II and I don't want any wikipedia regurgita."
by lightningbaroness December 1, 2010
Get the wikipedia regurgita mug.The pinnacle of human evolution , the biggest pp in the universe (if you disagree u have smol pp)
they get all the girls and men and are the highest form of chad.
they get all the girls and men and are the highest form of chad.
by kfcpotasium March 22, 2021
Get the Wikipedia mod mug.A kind of quantum encyclopedia, where genuine data both exists and doesn't exist depending on the precise moment a person relies upon the encyclopedia's discordant fucking mob for information.
by kalikitsune December 8, 2009
Get the Wikipedia mug.Wikipedia has some serious problems. Wikipedia articles/entries that are about History or Politics are often unreliable, extremely biased, and incredibly one sided. There are many examples of Wikipedia articles totally contradicting each other and presenting the contradictions as fact. There also many examples of Wikipedia articles stating totally FALSE information with weak citations and evidence that readers think is factual.
Wikipedia can be edited by anyone, content can be changed by anyone for any reason, so each article will most likely be written by someone who has a passion for the topic and therefore a bias for or against it. Wikipedia administrators are shadowy figures that can have very strong biases, and they control what you see and read on Wikipedia, effectively altering public opinion to fit their narrative and beliefs. Take what you read on Wikipedia with a huge grain of salt.
Wikipedia can be edited by anyone, content can be changed by anyone for any reason, so each article will most likely be written by someone who has a passion for the topic and therefore a bias for or against it. Wikipedia administrators are shadowy figures that can have very strong biases, and they control what you see and read on Wikipedia, effectively altering public opinion to fit their narrative and beliefs. Take what you read on Wikipedia with a huge grain of salt.
by YungGravyy May 12, 2019
Get the Wikipedia mug.