A korean pre-debut group under Pledis Entertainment with 17 members and an average age of 17 year old. Well known for live stream, 17tv which has 4 seasons and 3 Like Seventeen Show. Consist of dancing machine, angelic voice, diva, underage boys and derps. Has the best fandom ever because everyone is so chill and supportive towards each other. Deserve all the support and love because they work very hard to please the fans. They are all angels but can give you the feels in a snap. Life Ruiners.
non-SM17ES : help me, i cant memorise all of the seventeen members' names!
SM17ES : MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
SM17ES : MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
by Jungashy December 20, 2013
Get the Seventeen mug.Refers to the seven small contiguous states in the Nort East Region of India: Arunachal Pradesh, Assam, Manipur, Meghalaya, Mizoram, Nagaland, and Tripura.
The rest of mainland India is only connected to Assam properly; if you have to go to any of the other seven sisters, you need to make a stop at Assam.
by amsquareb December 18, 2017
Get the Seven Sisters mug.Related Words
Skeve
• Skevenune
• Skeverest
• Skeverr
• skeveve
• skevey
• Christmas Skeve
• seven
• Severna Park
• seventeen
1. One of two citizens under the Constitution of the United States. The other is a citizen of the United States. (Slaughterhouse Cases: 83 U.S. 36, at p. 74 and p. 75 1873)
2. A corporation is not a 'citizen' within Const. U. S. art. 4, §2, providing that the “citizens of each state shall be entitled to all the privileges and immunities of citizens OF the several states,” nor within the Fourteenth Amendment, §1. providing that “all persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside, and that no state shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States.”
2a. "Section 1770b has been several times considered by this court, and upheld to the full extent of its terms. It is enacted under the undoubted power of every state to impose conditions in absolute discretion upon granting the privilege of doing business in this state to any foreign corporation. Paul v. Virginia, 8 Wall. (U. S.) 168, 19 L. Ed. 357; Chicago T. & T. Co. v. Bashford, 120 Wis. 281, 97 N. W. 940. That power is not restrained by section 2, art. 4, of the federal Constitution, providing that the citizens of each state shall be entitled to all the privileges and immunities of citizens OF the several states, nor by section 1, Amend. 14, to that Constitution, providing that no state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States, because foreign corporations are not citizens. Paul v. Virginia, supra; Chicago T. & T. Co. v. Bashford, supra." Loverin & Browne Company v. Travis: 115 N.W. 829, 831 (1908)
2b. "It bas been repeatedly held, by the supreme court of the United States, that corporations were not citizens of the several states in such sense as to bring them within the protection of that clause in the constitution of the United States (section 2, article IV), which declares that ‘the citizens of each state shall be entitled to all the privileges and immunities of citizens OF the several states;’ Bank of Augusta v. Earle, 13 Peters, 586; Paul v. Virginia, 8 Wallace, 177.
Are corporations citizens of the United States within the meaning of the constitutional provision now under consideration? It is claimed in argument that, before the adoption of the 14th amendment, to be a citizen of the United States, it was necessary to become a citizen of one of the states, but that since the 14th amendment this is reversed, and that citizenship in a state is the result and consequence of the condition of citizenship of the United States.
Admitting this view to be correct, we do not see its bearing upon the question in issue. Who are citizens of the United States, within the meaning of the 14th amendment, we think is clearly settled by the terms of the amendment itself. ‘All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside.’ No words could make it clearer that citizens of the United States, within the meaning of this article, must be natural, and not artificial persons; for a corporation cannot be said to be born, nor can it be naturalized. I am clear, therefore, that a corporate body is not a citizen of the United States as that term is used in the 14th amendment." The Insurance Company v. The City of New Orleans: 1 5th. Jud. Cir. 85, 86 thru 88 (1870).
2c. “But in no case which has come under our observation, either in the State or Federal courts, has a corporation been considered a citizen within the meaning of that provision of the Constitution which declares that the citizens of each State shall be entitled to all the privileges and immunities of citizens OF the several States.” Paul v. State of Virginia: 75 U.S. 168, 178 (1868).
3. Privileges and immunities of a citizen of the several states are provided for in Corfield v. Coryell, decided by Mr. Justice Washington in the Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania in 1823. Hodges v. United States: 203 U.S. 1, at p. 15 (1906).
2. A corporation is not a 'citizen' within Const. U. S. art. 4, §2, providing that the “citizens of each state shall be entitled to all the privileges and immunities of citizens OF the several states,” nor within the Fourteenth Amendment, §1. providing that “all persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside, and that no state shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States.”
2a. "Section 1770b has been several times considered by this court, and upheld to the full extent of its terms. It is enacted under the undoubted power of every state to impose conditions in absolute discretion upon granting the privilege of doing business in this state to any foreign corporation. Paul v. Virginia, 8 Wall. (U. S.) 168, 19 L. Ed. 357; Chicago T. & T. Co. v. Bashford, 120 Wis. 281, 97 N. W. 940. That power is not restrained by section 2, art. 4, of the federal Constitution, providing that the citizens of each state shall be entitled to all the privileges and immunities of citizens OF the several states, nor by section 1, Amend. 14, to that Constitution, providing that no state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States, because foreign corporations are not citizens. Paul v. Virginia, supra; Chicago T. & T. Co. v. Bashford, supra." Loverin & Browne Company v. Travis: 115 N.W. 829, 831 (1908)
2b. "It bas been repeatedly held, by the supreme court of the United States, that corporations were not citizens of the several states in such sense as to bring them within the protection of that clause in the constitution of the United States (section 2, article IV), which declares that ‘the citizens of each state shall be entitled to all the privileges and immunities of citizens OF the several states;’ Bank of Augusta v. Earle, 13 Peters, 586; Paul v. Virginia, 8 Wallace, 177.
Are corporations citizens of the United States within the meaning of the constitutional provision now under consideration? It is claimed in argument that, before the adoption of the 14th amendment, to be a citizen of the United States, it was necessary to become a citizen of one of the states, but that since the 14th amendment this is reversed, and that citizenship in a state is the result and consequence of the condition of citizenship of the United States.
Admitting this view to be correct, we do not see its bearing upon the question in issue. Who are citizens of the United States, within the meaning of the 14th amendment, we think is clearly settled by the terms of the amendment itself. ‘All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside.’ No words could make it clearer that citizens of the United States, within the meaning of this article, must be natural, and not artificial persons; for a corporation cannot be said to be born, nor can it be naturalized. I am clear, therefore, that a corporate body is not a citizen of the United States as that term is used in the 14th amendment." The Insurance Company v. The City of New Orleans: 1 5th. Jud. Cir. 85, 86 thru 88 (1870).
2c. “But in no case which has come under our observation, either in the State or Federal courts, has a corporation been considered a citizen within the meaning of that provision of the Constitution which declares that the citizens of each State shall be entitled to all the privileges and immunities of citizens OF the several States.” Paul v. State of Virginia: 75 U.S. 168, 178 (1868).
3. Privileges and immunities of a citizen of the several states are provided for in Corfield v. Coryell, decided by Mr. Justice Washington in the Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania in 1823. Hodges v. United States: 203 U.S. 1, at p. 15 (1906).
by Big Generator September 19, 2009
Get the citizen of the several states mug.{(-)- means they use other endermanets other than/not only that, seems comfusing i cant elaborate all of them}
HOSHI- "HORANGHAE"
SCOUPS- "CHERRYHAE" (-) also "COUPRANGHAE"
JEONGHAN- "HANNIEHAE"
JOSHUA- "SHUARANGHE"
JUNHUI- "JUNRANGHAE"
WOOZI- "WOAHAE"
WONWOO- "AEONGHAE" (-) also "WONRANGHAE"
THE8- "PALRANGHAE"
MINGYU- "GYURANGHAE" (-)
DOKYEOM- "DOAHAE"
SEUNGKWAN- "KWANRANGHAE"
VERNON- "NONNIEHAE" (-)
DINO- "CHANRANGHAE" (-) also "CHANNIEHAE"
HOSHI- "HORANGHAE"
SCOUPS- "CHERRYHAE" (-) also "COUPRANGHAE"
JEONGHAN- "HANNIEHAE"
JOSHUA- "SHUARANGHE"
JUNHUI- "JUNRANGHAE"
WOOZI- "WOAHAE"
WONWOO- "AEONGHAE" (-) also "WONRANGHAE"
THE8- "PALRANGHAE"
MINGYU- "GYURANGHAE" (-)
DOKYEOM- "DOAHAE"
SEUNGKWAN- "KWANRANGHAE"
VERNON- "NONNIEHAE" (-)
DINO- "CHANRANGHAE" (-) also "CHANNIEHAE"
by Dino's Saur. December 29, 2021
Get the K-POP SEVENTEEN ENDEARMENTS mug.A grammatical point-of-view most commonly used in college dorm rooms, whereby the speaker (i) adopts the fictional persona of another party who exists in a separate context (e.g., a video game), and subsequently (ii) refers to himself or herself outside of such separate context, using the third-person point-of-view.
An example of proper usage of the Seventh Person form follows:
"Kong is going to the fridge to grab another beer. Does Yoshi need anything?"
"Kong is going to the fridge to grab another beer. Does Yoshi need anything?"
by The Ghief 3 March 25, 2013
Get the Seventh Person mug.Finishing Seventh in a poker tournament.
Named after poker professional Joe Sebok who has finished seventh in several WPT events (7th is just outside of the final six or what is called the TV final table)
can also be modified to-
sevenboking, sevenboked, sevenboker, seventhbok.
Named after poker professional Joe Sebok who has finished seventh in several WPT events (7th is just outside of the final six or what is called the TV final table)
can also be modified to-
sevenboking, sevenboked, sevenboker, seventhbok.
by Don in Nor Cal January 31, 2008
Get the SEVENBOK mug.by hiu[dghjkrel; November 21, 2013
Get the turdy seven mug.