by tnrunner April 27, 2006
Get the ampute mug."Why won't God heal amputees?" is an atheist site created by a liberal retarded atheist called Marshall Brain. The site employs faulty reasoning and fallacies to try and debunk the existence of God with the question in the title. The premise of the argument is that since God doesn't heal amputees when people pray for it, God couldn't possibly exist.
What the liberal idiot Marshall Brian overlooked as he wrote his next fallacy filled paragraph which is pretentious enough to brainwash college freshmen and other idiots into atheism, is that the existence of God has nothing to do with the promises of religion or prayer.
In deism or even general theism, God is simply the creator of the universe, the instigator behind The Big Bang and the designer of the laws of science that govern the universe. God isn't required to intervene in human affairs.
Marshall Brain's argument is simply an argument against prayer working. To say that "god is imaginary" because prayer doesn't work ignores observational science and laws. Mashall's argument ignores the sound Prime Mover argument which persists that every effect has a cause (a law of science), since the universe is in motion and came from a source, it was an effect that had a cause and the cause would have to be eternal as you cannot have an infinite regress (as an infinite line of objects creating other objects has no beginning and therefore no start) ergo the universe was the result of a timeless cause with no beginning.
What the liberal idiot Marshall Brian overlooked as he wrote his next fallacy filled paragraph which is pretentious enough to brainwash college freshmen and other idiots into atheism, is that the existence of God has nothing to do with the promises of religion or prayer.
In deism or even general theism, God is simply the creator of the universe, the instigator behind The Big Bang and the designer of the laws of science that govern the universe. God isn't required to intervene in human affairs.
Marshall Brain's argument is simply an argument against prayer working. To say that "god is imaginary" because prayer doesn't work ignores observational science and laws. Mashall's argument ignores the sound Prime Mover argument which persists that every effect has a cause (a law of science), since the universe is in motion and came from a source, it was an effect that had a cause and the cause would have to be eternal as you cannot have an infinite regress (as an infinite line of objects creating other objects has no beginning and therefore no start) ergo the universe was the result of a timeless cause with no beginning.
This creator cause (which can be called God) likely has intelligence judging by the mathematical cosmology of the universe which can be studied by mathematics, the constant fine tuning that can be observed throughout the universe along with the laws of science themselves. The likelihood of these principles having formed by themselves from mindless nothingness is simply impossible and next to believing in magic.
Sadly, atheists like Marshall Brian continue to reject modern science and physics and still persist that "things can come from nothing" despite this never being observed, displayed, measured or proven. Also if matter and energy could truly originate from "pure nothingness" then that simply begs the question of "why can't a god?" In the atheist world-view, intelligence was the product of nothingness, in an infinite multiverse, why would it be impossible that some intelligence that developed in some place became something akin to a god that could traverse different realities and dimensions or perhaps one of the realities or universes that formed "from nothing" formed with a consciousness? Atheists who truly believe in "nothing from something" can't really deny these hypothesises since they persist that such complex things could form from nothing, therefore atheism really destroys itself with its own ridiculous beliefs.
Why won't God heal amputees? Simple, God isn't required to.
Sadly, atheists like Marshall Brian continue to reject modern science and physics and still persist that "things can come from nothing" despite this never being observed, displayed, measured or proven. Also if matter and energy could truly originate from "pure nothingness" then that simply begs the question of "why can't a god?" In the atheist world-view, intelligence was the product of nothingness, in an infinite multiverse, why would it be impossible that some intelligence that developed in some place became something akin to a god that could traverse different realities and dimensions or perhaps one of the realities or universes that formed "from nothing" formed with a consciousness? Atheists who truly believe in "nothing from something" can't really deny these hypothesises since they persist that such complex things could form from nothing, therefore atheism really destroys itself with its own ridiculous beliefs.
Why won't God heal amputees? Simple, God isn't required to.
by The Logical Truth March 31, 2015
Get the Why won't God heal amputees? mug.Related Words
A great punk band from California which sound like the distillers meet the decendents and all that shit in between. Their debut, Slut bomb is out so buy it.
Molly likes her handjobs
and Toby's just a fat slob
They get drunk all day
And fuck their world away
Just like we did
Toby preaches kindness
and Molly's just his mattress
They smoke out all night
To try and to make things right
But that's what she said
That's what she said
Denise don't like needles
When she's face down in the street
But that's the way it goes
When you've sold you're soul
Can't fight your demons
Life's the bottom line
And still you waste your time
But that's what she said
That's what she said
and Toby's just a fat slob
They get drunk all day
And fuck their world away
Just like we did
Toby preaches kindness
and Molly's just his mattress
They smoke out all night
To try and to make things right
But that's what she said
That's what she said
Denise don't like needles
When she's face down in the street
But that's the way it goes
When you've sold you're soul
Can't fight your demons
Life's the bottom line
And still you waste your time
But that's what she said
That's what she said
by Idiot Paranoia July 7, 2004
Get the angry amputees mug.punk band from berea. TRAIN RECK. very popular. first was a ska band. russ is supper talented as everyone else in the band was
I love the amputeens!
by RYANCASEY RYANCASEY January 12, 2008
Get the AMPUTEENS mug.by Wico Iye Owaci January 7, 2012
Get the Amputeetertotter mug.(noun)
Variations: amputheater, amputheatre
Etymology: from Latin amputare, from am-, amb- (around) + putare (to cut, prune)
and
from Middle English theatre, from Middle French, from Latin theatrum, from Greek theatron, from theasthai (to view), from thea (act of seeing)
Date of First Recorded Usage: unknown
1 (a): an outdoor structure for public observation of the surgical excision of any of a various number of bodily extremities in ancient Greece and Rome (b): any area, location, or edifice for the viewing of a surgery in the nature of removal of corporeal tissue, ie. most commonly in the case of limb removal
2: a general sphere of enactment of the medical, or otherwise, distachment of living tissue
3 (a): a figurative locale, sphere of influence, or reference point at which an event is described to have had the sufficient level and amount of accidental or intentional violence, malevolence, angst, etc. to suggest removal of a limb, digit, phallic attachment, etc. (b) any entity containing the potential to cause such great discomfort, mental or physical anguish, distress, or a number of related conditions, so as to be reminiscent of bodily tissue excision or mutilation (c) any entity actually responsible for or capable of removing or mutilating limbs or otherwise
Variations: amputheater, amputheatre
Etymology: from Latin amputare, from am-, amb- (around) + putare (to cut, prune)
and
from Middle English theatre, from Middle French, from Latin theatrum, from Greek theatron, from theasthai (to view), from thea (act of seeing)
Date of First Recorded Usage: unknown
1 (a): an outdoor structure for public observation of the surgical excision of any of a various number of bodily extremities in ancient Greece and Rome (b): any area, location, or edifice for the viewing of a surgery in the nature of removal of corporeal tissue, ie. most commonly in the case of limb removal
2: a general sphere of enactment of the medical, or otherwise, distachment of living tissue
3 (a): a figurative locale, sphere of influence, or reference point at which an event is described to have had the sufficient level and amount of accidental or intentional violence, malevolence, angst, etc. to suggest removal of a limb, digit, phallic attachment, etc. (b) any entity containing the potential to cause such great discomfort, mental or physical anguish, distress, or a number of related conditions, so as to be reminiscent of bodily tissue excision or mutilation (c) any entity actually responsible for or capable of removing or mutilating limbs or otherwise
1(b): Alex gets his jollies by going to the amputheater.
2: Doug said the surgical unit was a real amputheater.
3 (c): Kevin is definitely an amputheater.
2: Doug said the surgical unit was a real amputheater.
3 (c): Kevin is definitely an amputheater.
by lord o' kenyon June 9, 2009
Get the amputheater mug.by BWS Ohio May 16, 2017
Get the amputeasing mug.