The logarithmic G scale is used to measure the overall influence, and the ability to influence, of an individual in society. The influence is measured as an absolute value of influence, that is, it doesn't differentiate between positive or negative influence.
The 1G base is used to describe any accomplished individual such as a doctor, lawyer, police captain, army major, university professor, capo.
The 1G base is used to describe any accomplished individual such as a doctor, lawyer, police captain, army major, university professor, capo.
Steve jobs is a 3.7 G in the logarithmic G scale.
George W Bush is a 4.0 G.
Bill Clinton 3.3 G. (+ .3 for Monica Lewinsky incident)
Larry Page 2.7 G
David Suzuki 1.8 G
Al Gore 1.9 G
Rupert Murdoch 5.0 G
George W Bush is a 4.0 G.
Bill Clinton 3.3 G. (+ .3 for Monica Lewinsky incident)
Larry Page 2.7 G
David Suzuki 1.8 G
Al Gore 1.9 G
Rupert Murdoch 5.0 G
by smoov3 September 25, 2011
Get the logarithmic G scale mug.These words mean the following:
A-average
B-broomstick
C-can't have dinner
D-don't come home
F-find new family
A-average
B-broomstick
C-can't have dinner
D-don't come home
F-find new family
Example of Asian Grading Scale:
Father: Lets look at your report card son.
Son: Ok.
Father: A, A, A, B...
Son: No, please don't!
Father: B IS FOR BROOMSTICK!!!
Father: Lets look at your report card son.
Son: Ok.
Father: A, A, A, B...
Son: No, please don't!
Father: B IS FOR BROOMSTICK!!!
by yshcbdjg,lvushkeysueuigslyifgh December 5, 2019
Get the Asian Grading Scale mug.For cringe sake!;
'Look at this sweaty cock-breath!' said Scott.
'Oh for cringe sake, calm down you cringe-lord.' replied Dale.
'I will fucking bomb your house.' threatened Scott.
'You're both as cringe as each-other, you witless dish-cloths!' settled Daryl.
'Look at this sweaty cock-breath!' said Scott.
'Oh for cringe sake, calm down you cringe-lord.' replied Dale.
'I will fucking bomb your house.' threatened Scott.
'You're both as cringe as each-other, you witless dish-cloths!' settled Daryl.
by Daryl714 September 9, 2019
Get the For cringe sake! mug.The level of skankiness of a trashy, slutty chick. Some are big skanks, while other's are just a little.
Joe: "I like my women a little skanky"
Lee: "What's up with that? man?"
Joe: "No, not big skanky, just a little skanky. There's a big difference. Know your skank scale"
Lee: "All right"
Lee: "What's up with that? man?"
Joe: "No, not big skanky, just a little skanky. There's a big difference. Know your skank scale"
Lee: "All right"
by Treday2k October 31, 2011
Get the skank scale mug.The Mohs Scale of Mineral Hardness displays the scratch resistance of various minerals through the ability of a harder material to scratch a softer material. It was created in 1812 by geologist Friedrich Mohs. It lists ten minerals, ranging from Talc (Softest Known Mineral) at 1 to Diamond (Hardest Known Mineral) at 10.
Mohs Scale of Mineral Hardness is as follows:
1 - Talc
2 - Gypsum
3 - Calcite
4 - Fluorite
5 - Apatite
6 - Orthoclase Feldspar
7 - Quartz
8 - Topaz
9 - Corundum
10 - Diamond
1 - Talc
2 - Gypsum
3 - Calcite
4 - Fluorite
5 - Apatite
6 - Orthoclase Feldspar
7 - Quartz
8 - Topaz
9 - Corundum
10 - Diamond
by Some you'll never meet January 5, 2013
Get the Mohs Scale of Mineral Hardness mug.The scale for rating women at University of Wisconsin Platteville. There are almost no good looking women in the school, so the traditional 1-10 scale does not apply. At platteville, you add 3 points to the score you would typically give a girl. 8's, 9's ,and 10's do not exist. Normal 5=platteville 8
Normal Scale- 1) Hey what would you give that girl?
2) Pry like a 4 man shes nasty!
Platteville Scale- 1) Hey what would you give that girl?
2) Oh shes pry about a platteville 7. I'd do her.
2) Pry like a 4 man shes nasty!
Platteville Scale- 1) Hey what would you give that girl?
2) Oh shes pry about a platteville 7. I'd do her.
by big thomas December 6, 2011
Get the Platteville Scale mug.Birthed by the enlightened minds at the London School of Economics Bankside House at the eve of 2022, this 1-5 scale, initially of a quarterly being (later amended to 6 and then 5), provided a progressive and refreshing new scale. The love child of several future Nobel laureates, the scale became widely adopted due to its simplicity as well as its acceptance of the fluctuating opinions that arise when analysing beauty both male, female and of any other kind:
The Scale works as follows:
1 - I would not get with them and I struggle to see why anybody else would (Not further divisible)
2 - I would not get with them but I see why somebody else would (Split into high, low and middle)
3 - I would get with them but I see why somebody else would not (Split into high, low and middle)
4 - I would get with them and I can’t see why anybody else would not (Not further divisible, as any disputes of preference within the 4 category are simply arbitrary)
5 - A rank that exists merely in theory but's existence is fundamental:
- A person who, by definition is a 4, but with an extra requirement:
- he, she or other, is so out of your league that you are simply satisfied to get with them just once, without ever pursuing or attempting to woo them again; your singular interaction should be a moment comparable to Jivanmukta, although one can only theorise
The Scale works as follows:
1 - I would not get with them and I struggle to see why anybody else would (Not further divisible)
2 - I would not get with them but I see why somebody else would (Split into high, low and middle)
3 - I would get with them but I see why somebody else would not (Split into high, low and middle)
4 - I would get with them and I can’t see why anybody else would not (Not further divisible, as any disputes of preference within the 4 category are simply arbitrary)
5 - A rank that exists merely in theory but's existence is fundamental:
- A person who, by definition is a 4, but with an extra requirement:
- he, she or other, is so out of your league that you are simply satisfied to get with them just once, without ever pursuing or attempting to woo them again; your singular interaction should be a moment comparable to Jivanmukta, although one can only theorise
person 1: did you see who person 2 was getting with last night
person 3: yh they were a mid 2
person 1: mid 2? thats a bit harsh
person 3: no mid 2 on the LSE New Scale
*person 1 and 3 smile at the camera breaking the fourth wall and ruining the scene*
person 3: yh they were a mid 2
person 1: mid 2? thats a bit harsh
person 3: no mid 2 on the LSE New Scale
*person 1 and 3 smile at the camera breaking the fourth wall and ruining the scene*
by the se7en February 6, 2022
Get the LSE New Scale mug.