There are two in-use definitions of the word 'atheist':
1.) A person who lacks belief in a god or gods. People who use this definition categorize atheists as either negative (or implicit or weak) atheists or positive (or explicit or strong) atheists. Negative atheists, while they don't believe in a god, do not positively assert that no gods exist. Positive atheists, however, do.
2.) A person who believes that no god or gods exist.
Those who consider themselves atheists (who are usually positive atheists) tend to define 'atheist' using the former definition, and those who believe in a god or gods tend to define 'atheist' using the latter. In both cases, this seems to be a demagogic practice intended to classify either as many or as few people as atheists as possible. Negative atheists are usually referred to as agnostics.
While neither definition of atheism entails any personality traits of atheists or of those who do believe in a god or gods (sometimes referred to as 'theists'), both atheists and theists tend to believe that certain traits apply to all atheists/theists. Common myths about atheists include: all atheists are arrogant, immoral, rebellious, and/or intolerant; all atheists really believe in (the Christian) God and are simply in denial; all atheists are depressed and believe life is meaningless. Common myths about theists include: all theists are naive and/or intolerant; all theists don't really believe in their god(s) and just pretend to because they're afraid that if people realised that no god exists, there will be complete chaos; all theists are weak and look to their god(s) for comfort. It hardly needs to be said that while these myths apply to a select few individuals in each group, the claim that they apply to every atheist or every theist is false.
Negative atheists justify their lack of belief in god(s) by pointing out that no evidence exists for the existence of god(s), and justify their lack of disbelief by pointing out that no evidence exists for the nonexistence thereof. Positive atheists often assert that while no evidence for god(s) exists, it should be by default assumed that they do not, until evidence is found. Some also try to use logic to prove that God does not exist, but this is often attached by theists and weak atheists as being mere wordplay. Some theists and weak atheists also assert that logic is superficial and meaningless (which is an easily refutable claim), and that only one's inner feelings can lead them to truth. Some positive atheists (and deists), however, are led to their stance through their feelings. Some feel that because the world is filled with evil and malice, and all-loving, benevolent god cannot exist. Those who are led to their stance through this feeling, however, cannot justify their disbelief in a malevolent god in the same way. Some reject the idea of the Christian God because the Bible states that non-Christians are condemned to Hell, and reject the idea as being too disturbing. While the same argument can also be made against the gods of various other religions, including Islam and Zoroastrianism, it cannot be made against every god (in Judaism, for example, Hell does not exist).
1.) A person who lacks belief in a god or gods. People who use this definition categorize atheists as either negative (or implicit or weak) atheists or positive (or explicit or strong) atheists. Negative atheists, while they don't believe in a god, do not positively assert that no gods exist. Positive atheists, however, do.
2.) A person who believes that no god or gods exist.
Those who consider themselves atheists (who are usually positive atheists) tend to define 'atheist' using the former definition, and those who believe in a god or gods tend to define 'atheist' using the latter. In both cases, this seems to be a demagogic practice intended to classify either as many or as few people as atheists as possible. Negative atheists are usually referred to as agnostics.
While neither definition of atheism entails any personality traits of atheists or of those who do believe in a god or gods (sometimes referred to as 'theists'), both atheists and theists tend to believe that certain traits apply to all atheists/theists. Common myths about atheists include: all atheists are arrogant, immoral, rebellious, and/or intolerant; all atheists really believe in (the Christian) God and are simply in denial; all atheists are depressed and believe life is meaningless. Common myths about theists include: all theists are naive and/or intolerant; all theists don't really believe in their god(s) and just pretend to because they're afraid that if people realised that no god exists, there will be complete chaos; all theists are weak and look to their god(s) for comfort. It hardly needs to be said that while these myths apply to a select few individuals in each group, the claim that they apply to every atheist or every theist is false.
Negative atheists justify their lack of belief in god(s) by pointing out that no evidence exists for the existence of god(s), and justify their lack of disbelief by pointing out that no evidence exists for the nonexistence thereof. Positive atheists often assert that while no evidence for god(s) exists, it should be by default assumed that they do not, until evidence is found. Some also try to use logic to prove that God does not exist, but this is often attached by theists and weak atheists as being mere wordplay. Some theists and weak atheists also assert that logic is superficial and meaningless (which is an easily refutable claim), and that only one's inner feelings can lead them to truth. Some positive atheists (and deists), however, are led to their stance through their feelings. Some feel that because the world is filled with evil and malice, and all-loving, benevolent god cannot exist. Those who are led to their stance through this feeling, however, cannot justify their disbelief in a malevolent god in the same way. Some reject the idea of the Christian God because the Bible states that non-Christians are condemned to Hell, and reject the idea as being too disturbing. While the same argument can also be made against the gods of various other religions, including Islam and Zoroastrianism, it cannot be made against every god (in Judaism, for example, Hell does not exist).
"Do you believe in God?"
"No, I don't."
"Then you're an atheist?"
"I suppose. I don't believe God doesn't exist, so I could probably be called an agnostic instead. Some atheists may consider me a 'negative atheist', though."
"Don't you think atheists.. er, would I call them 'positive atheists'? Don't you think they're intolerant?"
"Yes, you'd call them 'positive atheists', and no, I wouldn't say they're all intolerant. While some may come off as arrogant, they're just unable to understand how you can believe in God; you probably come off as arrogant to them, also, because you're unable to understand how they can disbelieve in God. People on both sides really need to make an effort to be more tolerant, and to discuss their stance on religion without using childish, immature insults."
"No, I don't."
"Then you're an atheist?"
"I suppose. I don't believe God doesn't exist, so I could probably be called an agnostic instead. Some atheists may consider me a 'negative atheist', though."
"Don't you think atheists.. er, would I call them 'positive atheists'? Don't you think they're intolerant?"
"Yes, you'd call them 'positive atheists', and no, I wouldn't say they're all intolerant. While some may come off as arrogant, they're just unable to understand how you can believe in God; you probably come off as arrogant to them, also, because you're unable to understand how they can disbelieve in God. People on both sides really need to make an effort to be more tolerant, and to discuss their stance on religion without using childish, immature insults."
by Anonymous May 13, 2005
Get the Atheist mug.Atharv is a person really ambitioned about his future. He has his own goals set and would always be dedicated to it. An atharv would always be competitve to be on the top. Doesnt care about others much but only on that one special girl. He would probably do anything for that girl to get her. Atharv might be really difficult to understand and doesnt like to be ruled by others. He is his own king.
by jasonderulosuer January 8, 2019
Get the Atharv mug.by Marcelo and Maia January 20, 2009
Get the Closet Atheist mug.Imagine a town, take out all of the good and you are left with what geoloists know as an Atherstone.
The majority of the population is comprised of drunks, pensioners and general ASBO young-uns. A very key factor regarding to be taken into consideration, is the very small local gene pool; inbreading isn't a problem yet, but without the introduction of fresh genetics into the area uno-brows will soon be worn like a unifom.
The local economy of an Atherstone is usualy supported by three key factors. These are as follows; Public Houses (or "Pub's" as the locals refer to them) are the main source of local income. The offspill from these is usualy take-aways (Indian, Chinese or other generic foregin muck), usualy serving slop-in-a-tray (the local specialty). Finaly charity or second hard stores make up he final key economic sector, providing the peasants with whatever they need, but can't eat or drink.
The majority of the population is comprised of drunks, pensioners and general ASBO young-uns. A very key factor regarding to be taken into consideration, is the very small local gene pool; inbreading isn't a problem yet, but without the introduction of fresh genetics into the area uno-brows will soon be worn like a unifom.
The local economy of an Atherstone is usualy supported by three key factors. These are as follows; Public Houses (or "Pub's" as the locals refer to them) are the main source of local income. The offspill from these is usualy take-aways (Indian, Chinese or other generic foregin muck), usualy serving slop-in-a-tray (the local specialty). Finaly charity or second hard stores make up he final key economic sector, providing the peasants with whatever they need, but can't eat or drink.
Tarquin; By jove, Giles. I could use a hooker, a beer and a a large serving of shit-in-a-tray! Where would you reccomend?
Giles: Well, Tarquin. If you also have a craving for an STD and a rash the size of an Antelope, join me for a sioré in Atherstone!
Giles: Well, Tarquin. If you also have a craving for an STD and a rash the size of an Antelope, join me for a sioré in Atherstone!
by Egon Ronay January 5, 2010
Get the Atherstone mug.
this is for the tiktok thing like remove the first and last letter.. so it was catherine.. now it’s atherin
by clickclatratatat April 11, 2020
Get the atherin mug.An awesome, sweet, cute girl who is super smart and the best in her class. She is a lot like Athena goddess of wisdom but a induvidual way of spelling it. Guys stare in awe when an Athina walks by and beg her for aproval. You NEVER want an Athina for an enemy or she WILL screw up your life.
by Skyeee!!! April 24, 2010
Get the Athina mug.