The Thomas Bradley scale is a measure of the tastiness of the ‘parmo’ based on the experiences of his eponymous founder - a prodigious and widely renowned consumer of the dish.
Bradley is widely known in the North East for his dedication to a parmo only diet - a commitment he maintained throughout his later years.
Mythology has it that Bradley often lavished himself with bottled Coca Cola which he would pour ravishingly over his face to remove the remnants of the Parmesan cheese.
Bradley is widely known in the North East for his dedication to a parmo only diet - a commitment he maintained throughout his later years.
Mythology has it that Bradley often lavished himself with bottled Coca Cola which he would pour ravishingly over his face to remove the remnants of the Parmesan cheese.
“Hey Byson, you got a Parmo from Bueno last night, how are they?”
“They’re definitely an 8 on the Thomas Bradley scale La - they would have got his fingers going ten to the dozen.”
“They’re definitely an 8 on the Thomas Bradley scale La - they would have got his fingers going ten to the dozen.”
by OmarTurk April 13, 2020
Get the Thomas Bradley Scale mug.The highest recorded fart had a magnitude of 9.2 on the Flatulence scale but some say there are much higher unrecorded farts with magnitudes of at least 15
by Obiwan723 January 18, 2021
Get the The Flatulence Scale mug.A scale used by some men in conversation about women rating how attractive a particular woman is. The ugliest being 1 and hottest being 10. Exact description of each number from 1-10 varies. One example is:
10 - "Will you marry me?"
9 - Stunning
8 - Beautiful/Gorgeous
7 - Cute/Pretty
6 - "She's 'ight"
5 - Average looking
4 - Below average
3 - Ugly
2 - Hidious
1 - "Kill it before it lays eggs!"
10 - "Will you marry me?"
9 - Stunning
8 - Beautiful/Gorgeous
7 - Cute/Pretty
6 - "She's 'ight"
5 - Average looking
4 - Below average
3 - Ugly
2 - Hidious
1 - "Kill it before it lays eggs!"
by ricosuavey September 12, 2016
Get the Scale of 1-10 mug.by Joe.long222 December 15, 2007
Get the 7.4 on the Rectum scale mug.For Normal Kids:
A- Amazing
B- Great
C- Fine
D- Not So Good or Below Average
F- Bad
Asian Kids:
A- Average
B- Below Average or Bad
C- Can’t Have Dinner
D- Don’t come home
F- Find a new family
A- Amazing
B- Great
C- Fine
D- Not So Good or Below Average
F- Bad
Asian Kids:
A- Average
B- Below Average or Bad
C- Can’t Have Dinner
D- Don’t come home
F- Find a new family
by Sportsexperter21 September 23, 2020
Get the Asian Grading Scale mug.The Kinsey scale attempts to measure sexual orientation, from 0 (exclusively heterosexual) to 6 (exclusively homosexual). It was first published in Sexual Behavior in the Human Male (1948) by Alfred Kinsey, Wardell Pomeroy and others, and was also prominent in the complementary work Sexual Behavior in the Human Female (1953).
Here's the scale:
0 Exclusively heterosexual
1 Predominantly heterosexual, only incidentally homosexual
2 Predominantly heterosexual, but more than incidentally homosexual
3 Equally heterosexual and homosexual
4 Predominantly homosexual, but more than incidentally heterosexual
5 Predominantly homosexual, only incidentally heterosexual
6 Exclusively homosexual
Here's the scale:
0 Exclusively heterosexual
1 Predominantly heterosexual, only incidentally homosexual
2 Predominantly heterosexual, but more than incidentally homosexual
3 Equally heterosexual and homosexual
4 Predominantly homosexual, but more than incidentally heterosexual
5 Predominantly homosexual, only incidentally heterosexual
6 Exclusively homosexual
Beth likes to have sex with men and women. I guess that would make her around a 3 on the Kinsey Scale?
by Mikitira July 10, 2006
Get the Kinsey Scale mug.The 1 - 4 scale was devised by several brilliant minds who grew increasingly frustrated with the inherent subjectivity of rating women on a 1-10 scale of fuckability. Hence, the 1 - 4 scale was created to avoid the dubious, yet frequent dilemma of distinguishing between a "9" an 8.4" a "3.4" etc. The genius of the 1 -4 scale is that it employs a categorical, objective system generally agreed upon by most heterosexual males (and lipstick lesbians, not the butch ones).
Without further ado, here is the breakdown of categories:
A "1": This category is designated for females who you un-mistakenably, undoubtedly, and unabashedly would not have sex with, even in your most inebriated, depressed and lonely state. The "1" is generally characterized by the lethal combination of an ugly face, extreme obesity and very low self-confidence.
The "2":
This category is interesting because a lot more variables come into play here. The "2" is agreed upon to be generally unattractive however due to a variety of circumstances (i.e. shes a butter face, decent face with a fat body, or you have a fetish for 14 year old Malaysian prostitutes), you will have sex with her if you are drunk enough. The key here is that nobody finds out. You make sure you keep this one to yourself.
The "3":
Simultaneously the easiest, yet most problematic category to define. The "3", very broadly put, is a legitimately attractive female who you would unashamedly have sex with. The "3" is worthy of bragging rights, perhaps even girlfriend material, if you're a pussy like that. This is probably the best you're going to ever do.
the "4":
The "4" is distinct and should not be thrown around lightly. To put it in the words of one of the founding fathers of the 1-4 scale, "this girl is so hot, you would kill your own mother and piss on her grave just to smell this girl's shit." While killing is a little extreme (given the nature of our court system and their increasing willingness to play the "hard line" on parent killings), it puts into context the magnitude of what the "4" represents. This girl is so out of your league, you avoid eye contact at all costs. "4's" represent under 1% of the female population, and you most likely will never insert your penis in one.
Without further ado, here is the breakdown of categories:
A "1": This category is designated for females who you un-mistakenably, undoubtedly, and unabashedly would not have sex with, even in your most inebriated, depressed and lonely state. The "1" is generally characterized by the lethal combination of an ugly face, extreme obesity and very low self-confidence.
The "2":
This category is interesting because a lot more variables come into play here. The "2" is agreed upon to be generally unattractive however due to a variety of circumstances (i.e. shes a butter face, decent face with a fat body, or you have a fetish for 14 year old Malaysian prostitutes), you will have sex with her if you are drunk enough. The key here is that nobody finds out. You make sure you keep this one to yourself.
The "3":
Simultaneously the easiest, yet most problematic category to define. The "3", very broadly put, is a legitimately attractive female who you would unashamedly have sex with. The "3" is worthy of bragging rights, perhaps even girlfriend material, if you're a pussy like that. This is probably the best you're going to ever do.
the "4":
The "4" is distinct and should not be thrown around lightly. To put it in the words of one of the founding fathers of the 1-4 scale, "this girl is so hot, you would kill your own mother and piss on her grave just to smell this girl's shit." While killing is a little extreme (given the nature of our court system and their increasing willingness to play the "hard line" on parent killings), it puts into context the magnitude of what the "4" represents. This girl is so out of your league, you avoid eye contact at all costs. "4's" represent under 1% of the female population, and you most likely will never insert your penis in one.
Me: "Hey dude, how did last night go?"
Roommate: "Not bad, brought a girl home"
Me: "Nice. She a 3?"
Roommate: "No, i'd say like a 7/10"
Me: "Listen cock-smoker, the 1-10 scale is for fucking amateurs, what is she on the 1 - 4 scale we discussed?"
Roommate: "Oh..I'd say mid-to-high 2ish"
Me: "werd"
Roommate: "Not bad, brought a girl home"
Me: "Nice. She a 3?"
Roommate: "No, i'd say like a 7/10"
Me: "Listen cock-smoker, the 1-10 scale is for fucking amateurs, what is she on the 1 - 4 scale we discussed?"
Roommate: "Oh..I'd say mid-to-high 2ish"
Me: "werd"
by porneggs March 1, 2009
Get the The 1 - 4 scale mug.