Bias of Arbitrary Objectivity

A bias where an individual declares their own perspective to be objective while dismissing all others as biased—without any justification for why their perspective deserves the "objective" label. The bias is arbitrary because the criteria for objectivity shift to always favor the biased party: what's "objective" is whatever they believe, whatever their side says, whatever serves their interests. This bias is the foundation of punditry, of editorializing, of the confident assertion that "I'm not political, I just believe in common sense" (where common sense means my opinions). The Bias of Arbitrary Objectivity allows its holder to feel rational while being utterly unreflective, to claim neutrality while being deeply partisan. It's the bias that denies it's a bias, which is what makes it so effective and so dangerous.

Example: "He introduced himself as 'just giving the facts, no bias.' Then he spent an hour presenting one side of every issue, dismissing opposing views as 'ideological.' The Bias of Arbitrary Objectivity meant he never had to examine his own assumptions—they weren't assumptions, they were just 'reality.' When challenged, he didn't defend his views; he defended his right to be the arbiter of what counts as objective. The bias was invisible to him, which is how it worked."

by Dumu The Void February 20, 2026

Dunning-Kruger Objectivity Bias

A meta-bias where people with the least expertise in a subject are the most confident that their perspective is the unbiased, objective one. Because they don't know enough to understand what they don't know, they mistake their own ignorance for a clean, uncontaminated vantage point. Experts, weighed down by complexity and nuance, seem "biased" to them precisely because experts acknowledge uncertainty and competing interpretations. The Dunning-Kruger Objectivist believes their empty cup is actually the clearest lens.

"I'm not a historian, so I can look at this war objectively without all that academic bias," tweeted a guy who learned about the conflict from a viral meme. Dunning-Kruger Objectivity Bias: when ignorance cosplays as clarity.

by Abzugal Nammugal Enkigal February 22, 2026

Non-Ignorance Objectivity Bias

The counterweight to Ignorance Objectivity—the belief that knowledge, while necessary, is never sufficient for objectivity. The Non-Ignorance Objectivist understands that learning a field's facts and methods is the entry requirement for having an informed opinion, but that even the most knowledgeable expert remains subject to framing effects, blind spots, and community assumptions. True objectivity isn't achieved by escaping knowledge or by accumulating it—it's achieved by constantly subjecting your knowledge to critique from multiple angles. It's the bias of people who know that knowing isn't enough.

"I've studied this for twenty years, which means I should be more suspicious of my own conclusions, not less. That's Non-Ignorance Objectivity Bias: expertise as the beginning of doubt, not the end of it."

by Abzugal Nammugal Enkigal February 22, 2026

Fooled by Objectivity Theory

A framework revealing how the ideal of objectivity can mislead—by pretending that anyone can occupy a "view from nowhere," by hiding the subjective choices that shape all observation, and by using "objectivity" to dismiss perspectives that don't fit dominant frameworks. Fooled by Objectivity Theory shows how claims to objectivity often mask particular interests, how the appearance of neutrality can be a weapon against the marginalized, and how the pursuit of objectivity can become a form of blindness. We are fooled when we think we're objective, when we mistake our perspective for reality itself.

Fooled by Objectivity Theory "I'm objective; you're biased." Fooled by Objectivity: treating one's own perspective as neutral, others' as partial. The speaker didn't see their own position, their own history, their own interests. Objectivity fooled them into thinking they had none. But everyone has a somewhere; pretending you don't is the surest way to be fooled by where you stand."

by Dumu The Void March 8, 2026

Law of Absolute and Relative Objectivity

The principle that objectivity operates in two modes: absolute objectivity (a perspective from nowhere, free of all bias and particularity) and relative objectivity (the best approximation of neutrality achievable within a given context). The law acknowledges that pure objectivity may be an ideal we can approach but never reach—like a horizon that recedes as we advance. Relative objectivity is what we actually achieve: perspectives that are as free as possible from obvious bias, while still being situated in a particular time, place, and culture. The law of absolute and relative objectivity reconciles the aspiration to neutrality with the reality of situatedness.

Law of Absolute and Relative Objectivity Example: "He claimed his news source was 'completely objective.' She invoked the law of absolute and relative objectivity: absolute objectivity is impossible (no view from nowhere), but relative objectivity is achievable (minimizing bias, disclosing perspective). His source had relative objectivity at best; his claim to absolute was the problem. He kept watching anyway, which is what people do."

by Abzugal February 16, 2026

Objectsterbating

To masterbate with a range of objects, that arent pornographic items. Items can include BABY DOLLS, PAPER (beware of paper cuts) A closet door, a key hole (for a small schnitzle) And even Cutting open a grape fruit, or as said in American Pie: TBOL, a PB&J sandwich.

Objectsterbating.
Man i have been jacking off to porn alot lately!

I should pick up Objectesterbating, i can do it with what ever i want!

HEY SIS! I NEED TO OBJECTSTERBATE WITH YOUR BABY DOLL

(SIS) Ok!

by LuckyJACKER69 March 11, 2010

objectiality

someone who actively has sex with objects

"dude i totally banged my flashlight yesterday" "i didn't know you were into objectiality"

by i am actually a fat cunt January 19, 2018