apollolism

Strong sexual urges that you get while listening to a song or songs. Not horny, just sexual.

I feel so apollolismic listening to this song. Anyone just wanna have s3x??

by The New Dawn July 5, 2023

Apokryltaros

A fat and ugly white wiki editor who is not even a mod, this man is a dicksucker. He Stalks wiki pages about POC and minority religions aswell as issues pertaining to ethnic people and prevents their contributions speaking on their religion and cultural heritage. This man is a cancer and the whole wikipedia community holes he dies of cancer.

Apokryltaros just unedited my post for no reason and cried to his mod boyfriend to ban me from posting on my tribes wikipedia page.

by auygaowm July 10, 2023

Apollo

The silliest guy in the world

Oh look! There's Apollo again, with his army of silly cats!!

by goofyman69 July 11, 2023

apotelesm

The research apotelesm was an invention Patent submitted to WIPO (World Intellectual Property) , a United Nations agency.

The research apotelesm was an invention Patent submitted to WIPO (World Intellectual Property) , a United Nations agency.

by AthanasiosZ July 13, 2023

Apolo

A nice and caring guy who loves his family and friends. All he try’s to do is make others happy

I’ve been hanging out with Apolo lately

by Alexander.the.great August 18, 2023

Apologetics

No amout of mental gymnastics is going to affect the binary nature of my proposition. It is EITHER a superordinate preferentially selected for trait in a hierarchy of preferentially selected traits or it isn't. If I'm not citing studies it's because they either don't exist (YET) or I'm unaware of them. Did you look it up or do the study before you tried to rebuke me? No? If I found or did the study would you cede your point or would you make up some sophistry to ignore the results like you're ignoring me. Your position is literally implicit "No True Scottsman Fallacy." "It's not CFCT! He's just just the TRUE Scottsman! That's what women are REALLY attracted to!"

Hym "Your apologetics do not obfuscate the fact that one is stigmatized and the other is not. And YOUR emotional state is 'easily manipulated.' Under the auspices of your liberal psychology WITHHOLDING INFORMATION is emotional abuse. The imposed schizophrenia is GASLIGHTING. The stalking is A CRIME. And is literally the definition of sexual harassment in the workplace but done in a way thay affords them plausible deniability. You don't care how they interacted with me. You just don't like the response. And you don't like that I'm giving people a reason to call into question your decision making. That MAYBE... JUUUST maybe... Your selection criteria is more superficial than you would like to admit. It isn't some sort of social-trigonometry leading you to fuck the guys you're fucking. And I'm not going to engage in the violence argument until you cede that there are some situations that can only be remediated by violence (Abject tyranny, self-defense, punitive, ect). We only care about rules when people we don't like are breaking them. That applies at NON-rules as well. This applies social/behavioral norms. You don't care how people behave until someone you don't like is doing something you don't like. Find a shred of consistency in the enforcement of behavioral norms. I'll wait... I'm sure you associate with people who have violated behavioral standards you believe people should adhere to. But you let it slide, don't you? And that's all this is."

by Hym Iam August 23, 2023

Apologize

I wouldn't even know to whom I should be apologizing nor for what I should be apologizing.

Hym "I'm sorry for openly stating that I totally see why people want and/or seek out to kill you and/or your kids (in the context of my experiences with people who are not me). I'm sorry that you are not an authority to which I can be held accountable. I'm sorry that your behavior is not the direct result of my behavior. To believe that YOUR BEHAVIOR... Is the result of my behavior... Is to insinuate that I somehow both control your behavior... And did it wrong in such an egregious fashion... That I now need to cede authority over my own behavior... To you... Indefinitely... And, in contradictory fashion, I also DON'T control your behavior... Because I cannot and should not be able to stop you from behaving as you are now... Nor am I justified in seeking to affect your behavior... Because I'm only allow to control your behavior by doing things you don't like and then allowing you to use your behavior as social punishment... But I'm NOT ALLOWED to control your behavior by telling you what you can or cannot do... And I'm going to apologize one last time... Because... If you believe anything even VAGUELY ANALOGOUS to what I just said... You... ARE IN FACT... AN ABSOLUTE FUCKING RETARD! That is a Schrodinger's box-esque narcissistic delusion where I am both in control of how you behave and not in control of how you behave."

by Hym Iam August 28, 2023