When you accuse someone of suffering from the Dunning–Kruger effect in an online argument. You are committing a classic
ad-hominem: You attack the person, claiming they lack
intelligence to have a valid
opinion. The argument itself is left untouched.
It is substituting rational thinking with quick emotion-
based judgmental attitudes. Because it feels
better attacking your opponent rather then engaging in clear rational thinking. You're just projecting your own insecurities onto your opponent.
Often goes hand-in-hand with credentialism.
Many zoomers are guilty of using this term in online arguments thinking they're very "smart" for referencing it. They learned about it from watching YouTube videos. It is very frustrating to deal with them having that mindset.
The Dunning-Kruger effect is about skill competence rather than intelligence.
“You’re a classic example of the Dunning–Kruger effect.”
If you are guilty of using Dunning-Kruger effect in online arguments, please stop & change your behavior. You're not contributing to
anything positive to foster rational thinking.
If you are not guilty, then continue with what you're doing &
don't make yourself susceptible to that behavior. Thank you for not being an asshole, make sure to avoid
people that engage in that behavior.