guy:hey dude!
another guy:chesse!
guy:but my mother is a pencil!
another guy:then lets get married!
guy:then go to the flying glass!
other guy:i ate buttass man
both:nooooooooooooo
you:this is random
another guy:chesse!
guy:but my mother is a pencil!
another guy:then lets get married!
guy:then go to the flying glass!
other guy:i ate buttass man
both:nooooooooooooo
you:this is random
by riganman!@# March 16, 2020
Get the random mug.An omakase (Japanese for “I'll leave it up to you”) or other tasting menu where the food served is chosen by the chef rather than by the diner. The term is a word play on the mathematical concept of the “random walk,” a mathematical concept used in science, economics and elsewhere, and the use of woks in restaurant kitchens (which is not limited to Chinese restaurants).
We tried the random wok menu at Miyamoto's the other night and it was awesome -- we loved every single dish the chef sent out.
by FitofPeak2 November 29, 2024
Get the random wok mug.Random's syndrome does usually have mental issues or missing a parent figure
(mother/father)
The person having random's syndrome
be also called under term "Femboy"
The syndrome symptoms are wea
too much so called high thighs and
promoting/expressing so called "transsexuality" , mostly like to do on public
The person also might see for homosexual relationship with a person
This syndrome is very infectious and it spreads through internet fastly, mostly like to infect the "weak-minded" people
(mother/father)
The person having random's syndrome
be also called under term "Femboy"
The syndrome symptoms are wea
too much so called high thighs and
promoting/expressing so called "transsexuality" , mostly like to do on public
The person also might see for homosexual relationship with a person
This syndrome is very infectious and it spreads through internet fastly, mostly like to infect the "weak-minded" people
Random's syndrome
When a person dresses as so called "femboy" or promotes their ideas and identity on public, following the mentioned symptoms
When a person dresses as so called "femboy" or promotes their ideas and identity on public, following the mentioned symptoms
by exoticemental February 26, 2024
Get the Random's syndrome mug.some random guy: im bored so im going to type random letters qweru0qwehmporifdhs iafohwemrofqu34wh5rn0H(DF*A(PGH)RN(SDPU<{q4325't;erw.''<P}>FCZXP
C:ZXL
"q29w3p4uyqwprnqhw4er--qwep;r;qwea'sf,cdlfgmnuseho89
C:ZXL
"q29w3p4uyqwprnqhw4er--qwep;r;qwea'sf,cdlfgmnuseho89
by hihowareyoulol January 19, 2023
Get the random letters mug.by Jackson Lyons-Lowe July 1, 2016
Get the Random mug.A annoying word for conversations or used to found a unpredictable thing like a random number generator also it is my first name so :(
by Randomsnz April 29, 2024
Get the Random mug.I'm glad that you brought that up because it takes me to my second problem with determinism. Let's try and visualize your argument.
D
>ID - ID
R > R
ED
So, and action is either Random (R) or Determined. If it's Determined it's either Internally (ID) or Externally (ED) Determined. If it's Externally Determined, then you have no control. If it's Internally Determined, then the internal determination is either Determined or Random. And I'm guessing that by "Determined" you mean "The necessary byproduct of an antecedent chain in which the actor or mechanism could not have done otherwise," Correct? Is that close? Does that make sense? I feel like there are a lot of presuppositions that need to be unpacked.
Hym "So, how is asking whether or not something is determined or random any different than asking whether or not my bedroom is hot or cold? It's both. And neither. It's, like, luke warm. So, you presuppose the absence of a grey area between determined and random. That random and determine don't exist on a spectrum in the same way hot and cold exist on a spectrum. As though thinks can't be more or less determined or more or less random. Is the outcome of a coin to more or less random than the outcome of rolling a 20 sided dice? You could say that the outcome is determined I guess. By the exact about of force used to roll the dice or flip the coin.
D
>ID - ID
R > R
ED
So, and action is either Random (R) or Determined. If it's Determined it's either Internally (ID) or Externally (ED) Determined. If it's Externally Determined, then you have no control. If it's Internally Determined, then the internal determination is either Determined or Random. And I'm guessing that by "Determined" you mean "The necessary byproduct of an antecedent chain in which the actor or mechanism could not have done otherwise," Correct? Is that close? Does that make sense? I feel like there are a lot of presuppositions that need to be unpacked.
Hym "So, how is asking whether or not something is determined or random any different than asking whether or not my bedroom is hot or cold? It's both. And neither. It's, like, luke warm. So, you presuppose the absence of a grey area between determined and random. That random and determine don't exist on a spectrum in the same way hot and cold exist on a spectrum. As though thinks can't be more or less determined or more or less random. Is the outcome of a coin to more or less random than the outcome of rolling a 20 sided dice? You could say that the outcome is determined I guess. By the exact about of force used to roll the dice or flip the coin.
The relationship between the material of the dice and the material of the surface of the table or the conditions of the air in the room you're flipping the coin. Also, if we accept 'determined' as 'the necessary byproduct of an antecedent chain in which the actor or mechanism could not have done otherwise' you presuppose that what happens in response to a given antecedent chain is what OUGHT to happen in response to said chain. So, Antecedent Chain A -> either Outcome A or Outcome B. If ACA -> OA then you have to presuppose that what ought to happen in response to ACA is OA. If ACA -> OB then, again, you're forced to presuppose that what ought a happen in response to ACA is OB. But if the likelihood of ACA leading to OB is 1% and it HAPPENS ANYWAY... What you have is NOT an outcome that 'couldn't have been otherwise' but, rather, SHOULD have been otherwise and wasn't. Ya feel me? So, I know this doesn't demonstrate free will but I don't think you have been able to successfully demonstrate that there isn't a point at which 'the self' is not the fundamental locus of control in any given choice. It's a good argument though. It's tricky. But it's like a weird semantic blackhole. It's like saying 'Well, if you don't actively control the firing of your neurons, you don't actually control yourself.' Just weird. Determined or random."
by Hym Iam December 5, 2023
Get the Determined or Random mug.