mlvd742's definitions
Another, more appauling version, of the Wet Willy. In this variation, one inserts their finger into their anus and then shoves it up the nose of an unsuspecting victim.
Though this can be done as nothing more than a cruel joke, it is typically executed when you want to humiliate someone and make them feel unworthy.
Though this can be done as nothing more than a cruel joke, it is typically executed when you want to humiliate someone and make them feel unworthy.
Clyde pissed me off so bad last night, I took it upon myself to teach him a lesson and give him a Bronco Billy that he'll never forget.
by mlvd742 December 8, 2009
Get the Bronco Billymug. Classifications 2 and 3:
2.) Someone who feels the need to post the same definition of an already over defined word with no new or interesting information to speak of on it. Some words have more than one meaning and at times the previous definition(s) may not be fully explained or could have more substance to further enhance its meaning; however, once all aspects have been discussed, you need to stop. There are only so many times someone can post bondage as kinky sex, sex that is kinky, rough sex involving kinky toys or a qweef as a pussy fart, cunt fart, or vaginal flatulence before you really start to just look desperate to get a word in edgewise (pun intended) on this site so that to yourself you appear "so original and inquisitive."
3.) Someone who tends to spend more time defining words with their own personal opinions rather than "facts." (The word facts is in quotations, because although some words on here are real, many are fictitious; however, that should not interfere with your ability to define to others what you take that word to mean, without stating how "awesome" or "disgusting" you think the word is.) For example, instead of defining anal sex as "something that is repulsive and only meant for queers," you should rather be focusing on what it actually is: "penetration of one's anus performed on both men/women that can involve the use of a penis or any numerous sex toys."
2.) Someone who feels the need to post the same definition of an already over defined word with no new or interesting information to speak of on it. Some words have more than one meaning and at times the previous definition(s) may not be fully explained or could have more substance to further enhance its meaning; however, once all aspects have been discussed, you need to stop. There are only so many times someone can post bondage as kinky sex, sex that is kinky, rough sex involving kinky toys or a qweef as a pussy fart, cunt fart, or vaginal flatulence before you really start to just look desperate to get a word in edgewise (pun intended) on this site so that to yourself you appear "so original and inquisitive."
3.) Someone who tends to spend more time defining words with their own personal opinions rather than "facts." (The word facts is in quotations, because although some words on here are real, many are fictitious; however, that should not interfere with your ability to define to others what you take that word to mean, without stating how "awesome" or "disgusting" you think the word is.) For example, instead of defining anal sex as "something that is repulsive and only meant for queers," you should rather be focusing on what it actually is: "penetration of one's anus performed on both men/women that can involve the use of a penis or any numerous sex toys."
Stop being an urbanignoramus!
by mlvd742 December 8, 2009
Get the urbanignoramusmug. The highly anticipated sequel to the original 1999 movie, The Boondock Saints. It was released on October 30, 2009 exclusively to only 67 theaters nationwide; however, expanded to additional theaters in November and again in December.
Due to the first movie practically becoming an instant cult classic, there was much hesitation from the fans who were both eager and skeptic to watch it. Yet, astoundingly enough, the writer and director, Troy Duffy, managed to produce a sequel that was equally as incredible as the first. (Though, the first will always win due to the fact that it was the film that started it all, the second one exceeded just about everyones expectations).
Future viewers can anticipate the following from this film: references to every major scene and joke from the first film, appearances and cameos of ALL (yes, that is somewhat a spoiler) the same characters from the first (including the bartender with Tourette's syndrome and Rocco's girlfriends cat!), do not fret over the addition of a seemingly attractive FBI agent for there is still no underlying theme of a romance (which is yet another reason most people adored the original film), and the anticipation of a third film to be made!
Due to the first movie practically becoming an instant cult classic, there was much hesitation from the fans who were both eager and skeptic to watch it. Yet, astoundingly enough, the writer and director, Troy Duffy, managed to produce a sequel that was equally as incredible as the first. (Though, the first will always win due to the fact that it was the film that started it all, the second one exceeded just about everyones expectations).
Future viewers can anticipate the following from this film: references to every major scene and joke from the first film, appearances and cameos of ALL (yes, that is somewhat a spoiler) the same characters from the first (including the bartender with Tourette's syndrome and Rocco's girlfriends cat!), do not fret over the addition of a seemingly attractive FBI agent for there is still no underlying theme of a romance (which is yet another reason most people adored the original film), and the anticipation of a third film to be made!
Whoa, the sequel to The Boondock Saints, The Boondock Saints II: All Saints Day, far exceeded my expectations and I now officially adore them both!
by mlvd742 December 8, 2009
Get the Boondock Saints II: All Saints Daymug. Another, non-sexual, definition of this widely used term referring to the tragic occurence of what happens when one accidentally super glues one body part to another resulting in a semi-permanent bond that is both frustrating and painful to separate.
Hal: Man, I had some painful bondage last night.
Stu: That's hot dude! With who?
Hal: This tube of Krazy Hold Super Glue.
Stu: That's hot dude! With who?
Hal: This tube of Krazy Hold Super Glue.
by mlvd742 December 5, 2009
Get the bondagemug. Classification 4:
4.) Someone who hardly defines a word. Though it is not necessary to type out a novel (as with this definition), especially since most people who visit this site are just looking for a few brief moments of a good laugh, you should still clearly state exactly what your word means so that others are not left with only part of the words definition. This also causes the annoying act of urbanignoramus classification number 2. If one person can just thoroughly define a word the first time, maybe then others will stop feeling the need to incessantly resubmit yet another replica of the definition.
4.) Someone who hardly defines a word. Though it is not necessary to type out a novel (as with this definition), especially since most people who visit this site are just looking for a few brief moments of a good laugh, you should still clearly state exactly what your word means so that others are not left with only part of the words definition. This also causes the annoying act of urbanignoramus classification number 2. If one person can just thoroughly define a word the first time, maybe then others will stop feeling the need to incessantly resubmit yet another replica of the definition.
What is with this chick being an urbanignoramus?
by mlvd742 December 8, 2009
Get the urbanignoramusmug. One who exhibits one or more of the following behaviors:
- Constantly blaming anything and everything on their dog who really does nothing wrong at all.
- Obsessed with puns to the point where they send all the ones they can think of to their friends via text.
- Frequently talking in a loud, high-pitched voice to emphasize almost every word they ever speak.
- Having mini seizures everytime someone even attempts to tickle them.
- Spending much time online looking up random videos and commercials that they find to be the greatest thing ever.
- They invent their own "seats" in cars and never actually sit in the designated passenger seats for standing still is a skill they have yet to master.
- Turning any ordinary task into a scene that mimics a porno.
- Amuses themselves by taking hundreds of photos on their phone, only to laugh at each one then delete them.
*Though typically this term describes a male, it can apply to women as well.
- Constantly blaming anything and everything on their dog who really does nothing wrong at all.
- Obsessed with puns to the point where they send all the ones they can think of to their friends via text.
- Frequently talking in a loud, high-pitched voice to emphasize almost every word they ever speak.
- Having mini seizures everytime someone even attempts to tickle them.
- Spending much time online looking up random videos and commercials that they find to be the greatest thing ever.
- They invent their own "seats" in cars and never actually sit in the designated passenger seats for standing still is a skill they have yet to master.
- Turning any ordinary task into a scene that mimics a porno.
- Amuses themselves by taking hundreds of photos on their phone, only to laugh at each one then delete them.
*Though typically this term describes a male, it can apply to women as well.
Ya know, I'm just going to pull The Andrew Jansick. From now one, every problem I have if Fido's fault!
by mlvd742 December 8, 2009
Get the The Andrew Jansickmug. A person who frequently misuses Urbandictionary.com. I.e. any individual who falls under one or more of the following classifications (there are 5 main classifications to define this word, yet due to the character limit on definitions, another post(s) will show the rest):
1.) Someone who posts a definition where there are spelling and grammar errors. Though this site is meant to be "just for fun," it really is also meant to be informative and enlightening. It is incredibly obnoxious to attempt to simply look up a few new words here and there and have to first decipher the submitters words before you can even begin to understand the definition they are trying to explain. Urbandictionary.com gives you 3 chances when submitting a new word to edit it, so why not take an extra minute of your time (especially since you are already committing a few minutes to even submit a word), and proof read it.
1.) Someone who posts a definition where there are spelling and grammar errors. Though this site is meant to be "just for fun," it really is also meant to be informative and enlightening. It is incredibly obnoxious to attempt to simply look up a few new words here and there and have to first decipher the submitters words before you can even begin to understand the definition they are trying to explain. Urbandictionary.com gives you 3 chances when submitting a new word to edit it, so why not take an extra minute of your time (especially since you are already committing a few minutes to even submit a word), and proof read it.
by mlvd742 December 8, 2009
Get the urbanignoramusmug.