mlvd742's definitions
A person who enjoys the music of Justin Bieber, but is too afraid to admit this to the world or any one person besides themself for that matter. Being that this artist gets hated on just as much as he is adored, making the statement of liking this sixteen year olds music and style is something that not everyone is proud of or comfortable with; hence, they are still "in the closet" with their JB love.
Yes world, I enjoy My World 2.0. I've been a closet Bieberian for 4 months now and I just can't keep this a secret any longer. I get down to Baby every time I hear it on the radio. Please don't disown me mom.
by mlvd742 May 3, 2010
Get the closet Bieberianmug. Another, less appauling version, of the well-known "Golden Shower." In the CR style, one takes the famously delicious beverage known as Mountain Dew and gargles it their mouth until it becomes warm. Their partner (either male or female) is then put on their knees with their mouth wide open (eyes may be open or shut depending on one's personal preferences), as the other proceeds to spit and pour out the contents of their Mountain Dew concoction into the others mouth. Though this practice can be done for the pleasure of tasting this beverage in a whole new way, typically it is meant to be erotic and done for sexual pleasure for either both one or both parties.
My girlfriend was never as into Golden Showers as I was until I gave her a hot one, Golden Shower CR style.
by mlvd742 December 5, 2009
Get the Golden Shower CR stylemug. Classification 4:
4.) Someone who hardly defines a word. Though it is not necessary to type out a novel (as with this definition), especially since most people who visit this site are just looking for a few brief moments of a good laugh, you should still clearly state exactly what your word means so that others are not left with only part of the words definition. This also causes the annoying act of urbanignoramus classification number 2. If one person can just thoroughly define a word the first time, maybe then others will stop feeling the need to incessantly resubmit yet another replica of the definition.
4.) Someone who hardly defines a word. Though it is not necessary to type out a novel (as with this definition), especially since most people who visit this site are just looking for a few brief moments of a good laugh, you should still clearly state exactly what your word means so that others are not left with only part of the words definition. This also causes the annoying act of urbanignoramus classification number 2. If one person can just thoroughly define a word the first time, maybe then others will stop feeling the need to incessantly resubmit yet another replica of the definition.
What is with this chick being an urbanignoramus?
by mlvd742 December 8, 2009
Get the urbanignoramusmug. Another, non-sexual, definition of this widely used term referring to the tragic occurence of what happens when one accidentally super glues one body part to another resulting in a semi-permanent bond that is both frustrating and painful to separate.
Hal: Man, I had some painful bondage last night.
Stu: That's hot dude! With who?
Hal: This tube of Krazy Hold Super Glue.
Stu: That's hot dude! With who?
Hal: This tube of Krazy Hold Super Glue.
by mlvd742 December 5, 2009
Get the bondagemug. Lastly, classification number 5:
5.) Someone whose made-up word pertains only to that individual or is most obviously an inside joke that only they are their friends will care about. While many of the words submitted to this website are created from your own life experiences, when submitting it, you should be focused of submitting your word so that others whom you do not know may laugh and enjoy the definition as well. Sure your word may be derived from "that one night at Jenna's house," yet do not submit it if you are not willing to explain the meaning in a way that others will care about. Also, while many words may be defining a specific individual you know or the definition may contain their name, instead of doing this, rather explain traits attributed to that person so others can relate. Instead of saying that (completely made up example) a defaugh is when someone acts like Jane Doe Smith (perhaps this is a girl you know that is incredibly attractive, but has gross habits of picking her nose in public), then say just that. A defaugh is when a really attractive female commits gross habits in public. There, now everyone can laugh.
5.) Someone whose made-up word pertains only to that individual or is most obviously an inside joke that only they are their friends will care about. While many of the words submitted to this website are created from your own life experiences, when submitting it, you should be focused of submitting your word so that others whom you do not know may laugh and enjoy the definition as well. Sure your word may be derived from "that one night at Jenna's house," yet do not submit it if you are not willing to explain the meaning in a way that others will care about. Also, while many words may be defining a specific individual you know or the definition may contain their name, instead of doing this, rather explain traits attributed to that person so others can relate. Instead of saying that (completely made up example) a defaugh is when someone acts like Jane Doe Smith (perhaps this is a girl you know that is incredibly attractive, but has gross habits of picking her nose in public), then say just that. A defaugh is when a really attractive female commits gross habits in public. There, now everyone can laugh.
I think you are turning into an urbanignoramus.
by mlvd742 December 8, 2009
Get the urbanignoramusmug. The highly anticipated sequel to the original 1999 movie, The Boondock Saints. It was released on October 30, 2009 exclusively to only 67 theaters nationwide; however, expanded to additional theaters in November and again in December.
Due to the first movie practically becoming an instant cult classic, there was much hesitation from the fans who were both eager and skeptic to watch it. Yet, astoundingly enough, the writer and director, Troy Duffy, managed to produce a sequel that was equally as incredible as the first. (Though, the first will always win due to the fact that it was the film that started it all, the second one exceeded just about everyones expectations).
Future viewers can anticipate the following from this film: references to every major scene and joke from the first film, appearances and cameos of ALL (yes, that is somewhat a spoiler) the same characters from the first (including the bartender with Tourette's syndrome and Rocco's girlfriends cat!), do not fret over the addition of a seemingly attractive FBI agent for there is still no underlying theme of a romance (which is yet another reason most people adored the original film), and the anticipation of a third film to be made!
Due to the first movie practically becoming an instant cult classic, there was much hesitation from the fans who were both eager and skeptic to watch it. Yet, astoundingly enough, the writer and director, Troy Duffy, managed to produce a sequel that was equally as incredible as the first. (Though, the first will always win due to the fact that it was the film that started it all, the second one exceeded just about everyones expectations).
Future viewers can anticipate the following from this film: references to every major scene and joke from the first film, appearances and cameos of ALL (yes, that is somewhat a spoiler) the same characters from the first (including the bartender with Tourette's syndrome and Rocco's girlfriends cat!), do not fret over the addition of a seemingly attractive FBI agent for there is still no underlying theme of a romance (which is yet another reason most people adored the original film), and the anticipation of a third film to be made!
Whoa, the sequel to The Boondock Saints, The Boondock Saints II: All Saints Day, far exceeded my expectations and I now officially adore them both!
by mlvd742 December 8, 2009
Get the Boondock Saints II: All Saints Daymug. Classifications 2 and 3:
2.) Someone who feels the need to post the same definition of an already over defined word with no new or interesting information to speak of on it. Some words have more than one meaning and at times the previous definition(s) may not be fully explained or could have more substance to further enhance its meaning; however, once all aspects have been discussed, you need to stop. There are only so many times someone can post bondage as kinky sex, sex that is kinky, rough sex involving kinky toys or a qweef as a pussy fart, cunt fart, or vaginal flatulence before you really start to just look desperate to get a word in edgewise (pun intended) on this site so that to yourself you appear "so original and inquisitive."
3.) Someone who tends to spend more time defining words with their own personal opinions rather than "facts." (The word facts is in quotations, because although some words on here are real, many are fictitious; however, that should not interfere with your ability to define to others what you take that word to mean, without stating how "awesome" or "disgusting" you think the word is.) For example, instead of defining anal sex as "something that is repulsive and only meant for queers," you should rather be focusing on what it actually is: "penetration of one's anus performed on both men/women that can involve the use of a penis or any numerous sex toys."
2.) Someone who feels the need to post the same definition of an already over defined word with no new or interesting information to speak of on it. Some words have more than one meaning and at times the previous definition(s) may not be fully explained or could have more substance to further enhance its meaning; however, once all aspects have been discussed, you need to stop. There are only so many times someone can post bondage as kinky sex, sex that is kinky, rough sex involving kinky toys or a qweef as a pussy fart, cunt fart, or vaginal flatulence before you really start to just look desperate to get a word in edgewise (pun intended) on this site so that to yourself you appear "so original and inquisitive."
3.) Someone who tends to spend more time defining words with their own personal opinions rather than "facts." (The word facts is in quotations, because although some words on here are real, many are fictitious; however, that should not interfere with your ability to define to others what you take that word to mean, without stating how "awesome" or "disgusting" you think the word is.) For example, instead of defining anal sex as "something that is repulsive and only meant for queers," you should rather be focusing on what it actually is: "penetration of one's anus performed on both men/women that can involve the use of a penis or any numerous sex toys."
Stop being an urbanignoramus!
by mlvd742 December 8, 2009
Get the urbanignoramusmug.