You're missing the point. If you liking me doesn't translate to or manifest in the form of anything tangible, whether or not you like me is irrelevant. It's not conflation, you've rendered yourself moot. And it's not that what you're saying is untrue BUT it seems to be the cases that anything other than affirming their love of big fat cocks is unacceptable. I'm not doing anything that anybody else isn't doing. And I maintain that my position is and has alway been: I have a right to know what's going on around me. Even if that means the people around me lose a degree of social leverage. It isn't not my responsibility to accept an
imposed form of ignorance that is used explicitly to keep me from using my own capacity for choice and keep my behavior convenient. It's only "not real" because if it IS REAL then the random circumabulation of my mind is worth more than your entire life's work. In the same way that some atheist don't want to believe that God is real because if it IS REAL it means that your soul is going to burn forever.
imposed form of ignorance that is used explicitly to keep me from using my own capacity for choice and keep my behavior convenient. It's only "not real" because if it IS REAL then the random circumabulation of my mind is worth more than your entire life's work. In the same way that some atheist don't want to believe that God is real because if it IS REAL it means that your soul is going to burn forever.
Hym "The problem with the assertion that an outcome is the result of *Insert amorphous abstraction here* is that the logical conclusion always leads to an existential superiority claim. Do you *Insert amorphous abstraction here* as hard as an Alaskan crab fisherman? No? So then were does the disproportionate success come from? *insert existential superiority claim* Well, you could say, 'The job has a different "type" of difficulty' BUT are you accounting for mitigating variables in your self assessment? Does association mitigate the 'difficulty' of garnering disproportionate success? Then, why are people so willing to associate with you as opposed to other? *Insert existential superiority claim* So, what is the point of using these amorphous abstractions? It's a convenient out when you're engaged in verbal conflict. You can always drag the conflict down into the realm of semantics at a moments notice. Imagine, we're in conflict over our disparate outcomes. You posit *Insert amorphous abstraction here* as justification for the disparity. I am then forced to either accept your definition of what constitutes *Insert amorphous abstraction here* (Which I have no reason to do because we're in conflict) OR I have convince you that your definition of *Insert amorphous abstraction here* is flawed or incongruous with objective reality (Which I will never be able to do because you would never render your own outcome unjustified). It's just a word-trick."
by Hym Iam February 26, 2023

And, other countries, don't reduce the tariffs on America until he brings China's back down. And tell China to gimme the specs on the artificial sun.
Hym "Don't buy this bullshit 90 day pause on the tariffs. Leave the tariffs on America until he pays the creator of AI."
by Hym Iam April 10, 2025

Speaking of her... I saw her the other day. Her and her fat, short inferior husband went to the strip mall by my house... 🤏 That close Jordan
Hym "Don't invoke her as though she has been victimized in any way, shape, or form. I should have choked the shit out of her little ass... But I didn't! So I'm not morally culpable in any way. I've actually never done anything wrong. And I'm better than everyone. And I don't belong in an oven because I'm not a Jew."
by Hym Iam March 17, 2024

by Hym Iam July 07, 2025

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA! AHA! AHA! THAT IS FUCKING PRICELESS! HAAAAHAHAHAHAHA! HE'S EVEN GOT A LITTLE ALTER-EGO! AHAHAHAHAHAHA! OHMYGOD! OHMYGOD! I FUCKING LOVE THIS GUY! AHA! OHMYGODILOVETHISGUYSOMUCH! AAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHA! I'M LIKE THE ULTIMATE POLITICAL STRATEGIST! AHAHA! FUCK! HOLY SHIT are you guys lucky! I could have your daughters strapped to a conveyor-belt awaiting ME-exclusive breeding RIGHT NOW! HA! OH MAN! OOOOH MAN! I am so FUCKING EFFECTIVE! I'm so effective I surprise even myself!
Hym "PFFFAHAHAHAHA! OH! THANK YOU ARGENTINA! I TAKE FULL CREDIT FOR THAT! UNLESS he genocides everyone! Well, no, wait... I still want credit for the kills... Hmm... Ok, You know what? The kills will add to MY score but give him credit for doing it... And not me Hym but him. Hilarious! I'm actually starting to come around to this iteration of reality. Get me some of these pornstars and I might actually like the place! HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!"
by Hym Iam November 21, 2023

Hym "Yeah you want me to move right past it. I'm not going to do it but you CLEARLY want me to do that. How does empathy feel? Is it good? Do you like it? I don't know. I don't do it. Is it like... Dope? Or something? Do you like it?"
by Hym Iam October 20, 2023

So the Catholics... Where DENYING Lgbtq parents... EXPLICITLY for being lgbt (You can veil it in rhetoric by saying "Because kids deserve a mother and a father" but it's literally the same thing it's literally ) And that was fine... But now what they did do the gays is being done to them... And YOU KNOW the Catholics shouldn't be discriminating against them in the first place...
Hym "Getting rid of the catholic foster homes doesn't seem fair to me... BUT you KNOW that they will NOT ONLY refuse to be fair towards people who don't share their world view... But will never be amenable to reason. And now to hoist them by their petard seems like it's unfair to the kids... But how WILL Lgbt kids be treated by the catholic parents? This shouldn't need to be the case. From EITHER of them. One of them is far more tolerant than the other. He wants to frame it AS the Catholics being hiisted by their own petard (and on some level they ARE, in fact, being that) but what REASON is better to deny would-be parents access to foster kids? One of the parents being the wrong gender or how the parents are likely to treat the kids?"
by Hym Iam August 18, 2023
