Dawnian
1) A language originating in the Denton Texas area. First written records appeared in the notes of a girl named Dawnie. Fairly random language and easy to learn.
Urban Dictionary
conspiracy of idiots
\kənˈspɪrəsi ɒv ˈɪdɪəts\ (noun) A group of idiots, loosely gathered, characterized by lack of self-awareness and an intellectual inability to empathize.
What we have here is a conspiracy of idiots.
conspiracy of idiots by phurbutt January 7, 2022
panoramarection
panoramarection by George Hoefer March 8, 2005
Sheldon
Absolute legend him. Super nice and very sweet. Considerably smart, has a passion for the universe and space. Great sense of humour. Absolutely built, a unit. Muscular, tall handsome. Plays the guitar. Tend to come shy at first meet but very talkative once you get to know them.
Sheldon by Definitely not Sheldon November 25, 2023
Swedish cabbage
Swedish cabbage by 0n10nst4r October 12, 2017
Beans
Multiple ecstasy pills, although you rarely heard anybody refer to taking just one as eating a bean. This implies a person will be taking at least two, which used to be common. Another word for ecstasy was rolls.
Beans by Solid Mantis May 21, 2016
Identity Theft Theorem
A mathematical theorem stating that any given number may equal any other number. This theorem can also be used on itself, meaning it may be used in anything imaginable. this theorem cannot be proven or disproven because in either case, the Identity Theft theorem can be used to prove just the opposite.
Examples in math:
3+3=8
1=487
38=58
Example in an argument:
Two people are arguing which is better, Mario or Zelda. Person A believes Mario is better because of the massive amount of games he has starred in. But person B uses the Identity Theft Theorem to prove that Mario IS Zelda. When person A says that that makes no sense, person B may say that by using the Identity Theft Theorem, he has proven that nonsense in itself is now sensible. But since person A may also use the Identity Theft Theorem, there can never be any true winner, unless the Identity Theft Theorem on the outcome as well.
3+3=8
1=487
38=58
Example in an argument:
Two people are arguing which is better, Mario or Zelda. Person A believes Mario is better because of the massive amount of games he has starred in. But person B uses the Identity Theft Theorem to prove that Mario IS Zelda. When person A says that that makes no sense, person B may say that by using the Identity Theft Theorem, he has proven that nonsense in itself is now sensible. But since person A may also use the Identity Theft Theorem, there can never be any true winner, unless the Identity Theft Theorem on the outcome as well.
Identity Theft Theorem by TranceDjAelita February 9, 2006