The unreflective assertion that any phenomenon must be explained by looking inside the
brain, regardless of whether the phenomenon is social, historical, or cultural. Neurocentrist dogmatism rejects the possibility of autonomous explanations at higher levels, insisting that “real” explanations are always neural. It appears in claims like “violence is caused by
brain chemistry, not poverty” or “love is just oxytocin, not relationship
history.” It ignores the fact that brains are embedded in bodies, societies, and environments that
co‑constitute experience.
Example: “He attributed
addiction entirely to dopamine circuits, dismissing social and economic factors as
irrelevant. Neurocentrist dogmatism: reducing complex, multi‑level phenomena to a single neural dimension.”
Neurocentrist Orthodoxy
The established institutional and intellectual consensus that privileges
brain‑centered explanations across psychology, psychiatry, and cognitive
science. This orthodoxy dictates funding priorities, publication standards, and career advancement, often marginalizing researchers who focus on environmental, developmental, or systemic factors. It is reinforced by the prestige of neuroimaging technology and the assumption that “seeing the
brain” provides a more fundamental understanding than observing behavior or social interaction. The orthodoxy can persist even when its explanatory yield is modest.
Example: “Her research on childhood trauma’s
long‑term effects was rejected by a journal because it didn’t include neuroimaging. Neurocentrist orthodoxy: demanding a particular method as the price of legitimacy.”