"I mean, I'm reading it how you're reading it and I'm like 'It doesn't make any sense!' "
Hym "That isn't how I'm reading it though so no... That's not what you're doing. This is what I was talking about earlier. The assertion that our disagreement comes from MY failure to comprehend information. It's not that it doesn't make sense to me it's that Leviticus IS a slavery and animal sacrifice instruction manual. It outlines exactly how it wants you to treat slaves and it tells you exactly how many animals you have to kill to forgive sin. I'm not failing to understand anything. I think I made a fallacy out of that? Did we ever find out if that was already a thing or not? Argumentum ad Comprehendum? Is there already one that is like that? New fallacy! Humanity's greatest schilar of reason!"
When you have to pee in a movie but don’t want to miss anything, and must do the following mental equation: will the amount I have to pee cause enough discomfort to diminish my attention capacity for the remainder of the movie to an extent which is greater than the amount of the movie I would miss by making a mad dash to the restroom.
I saw Satantango last night, wonderful film but by the 5th hour I had to start doing pee calculus.
Short-hand for the word floccinaucinihilipilification, meaning the estimation of something as valueless (encountered mainly as an example of one of the longest words in the English language).