As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a Khasm/Slipknott shitstarting/retarded post approaches 1.
Example of Khasm's Law
"Ok, you can sugar coat all you want, and fill in all the neccesary details you want to make your logic appear more concrete than when you wrote "I've watched 1000 episodes of Law and Order, and I know how to use Google/Wikipedia". All I was doing was responding to how stupid that comment was on it's own, I wasn't trying to "assume" I knew anything about your stupid court case. I was just making a point that saying that was stupid." -Khasm
"Ok, you can sugar coat all you want, and fill in all the neccesary details you want to make your logic appear more concrete than when you wrote "I've watched 1000 episodes of Law and Order, and I know how to use Google/Wikipedia". All I was doing was responding to how stupid that comment was on it's own, I wasn't trying to "assume" I knew anything about your stupid court case. I was just making a point that saying that was stupid." -Khasm
by Sinncab6 January 23, 2010