Double-Edged-Sword Fallacy
The logical error of dismissing a specific, valid criticism of an object, action, or policy by appealing to the universal truth that all things possess inherent advantages and disadvantages. It incorrectly implies that because trade-offs are inevitable, any specific negative consequence is normalized and therefore immune to evaluation or mitigation.
Person 1: "I believe X technology is bad because Y reasons"
Person 2: "Well, rockets go to space, but they also kill people."
Person 2 is attempting to make Person 1's argument invalid by stating other things also have a bad side. While Person 2 is correct, that does not make Person 1's argument any less valid, therefore Person 2 is commiting a Double-Edged-Sword Fallacy.
Person 2: "Well, rockets go to space, but they also kill people."
Person 2 is attempting to make Person 1's argument invalid by stating other things also have a bad side. While Person 2 is correct, that does not make Person 1's argument any less valid, therefore Person 2 is commiting a Double-Edged-Sword Fallacy.
Double-Edged-Sword Fallacy by A Literal Catfish November 4, 2026