by Random Ghost :) February 05, 2024
Yeah, the grey area is broader than I had initially thought don't snap your spine patting yourself on the back. And yeah I'm getting to it I'm spinning a lot of plates here. I have like 20 other tabs open with other things I'm actively thinking about at the moment. I'm getting to it fuck-face, relax!
Hym "As far as the biological sex rant is concerned, I didn't realize the multiplicity of ways in which a person can be intersex and it obfuscates the ontology of the matter. And what I mean by that is that even if it's true that there is a way in which an XY chromosome person can be genetically male but phenotypically appear female (And can, therefore, be both male and female) but you still have to reconcile fact that the way in which SOME trans-people ARE 'Trans' is in an abstract one. So, the XY chromosome, phenotypically female (Or male I guess I'm sure it happens in reverse) is both male and female in an ontological sense.
The trans-person has no consistent genetic marker so we have to look at the epistemology. And I've already done this. I talk about the ways in which a person can be temperamentally more feminine or masculine (Women tend to be high in trait agreeableness and higher in neuroticism, therefore, a man who is both uniquely high in agreeableness and neuroticism would be temperamentally more 'feminine' than all men AND some women and could, therefore,
Hym "As far as the biological sex rant is concerned, I didn't realize the multiplicity of ways in which a person can be intersex and it obfuscates the ontology of the matter. And what I mean by that is that even if it's true that there is a way in which an XY chromosome person can be genetically male but phenotypically appear female (And can, therefore, be both male and female) but you still have to reconcile fact that the way in which SOME trans-people ARE 'Trans' is in an abstract one. So, the XY chromosome, phenotypically female (Or male I guess I'm sure it happens in reverse) is both male and female in an ontological sense.
The trans-person has no consistent genetic marker so we have to look at the epistemology. And I've already done this. I talk about the ways in which a person can be temperamentally more feminine or masculine (Women tend to be high in trait agreeableness and higher in neuroticism, therefore, a man who is both uniquely high in agreeableness and neuroticism would be temperamentally more 'feminine' than all men AND some women and could, therefore,
get the sensation that they are not the thing they present as phenotypically and seek to remediate that) AND I consider how THAT PHENOMENON interacts with sexuality.
But IS that sensation congruent with objective reality and IS that phenomenon sufficient justification for changing and/or creating more legislation. In what way does being trans interact with other people AND how much authority over their own person are they expected to cede for these people to be happy with the way in which they are being interacted with?
And as far as the health concerns are concerned, if the treatment sterilizes them, it's inconsequential because they can always adopt and/or freeze reproductive matter for later use, if estrogen increases the risk of prostate cancer, they likely would have got cancer and they die anyways, and if teaching them is has some kind of profoundly negative psychological effects, what are those effects? What is the issue there? Are they going to increase in frequency or even result in sleeping with 'wrong person?' What is, like, that maximally destructive octcome tha-OH! Right! Eternal damnation hellfire forever land. Ha! I genuinely forget that THAT is a real consequence people believe will happen in an ontological sense. Ha! That's like the whole thing right there! Ha! Biological Sex."
But IS that sensation congruent with objective reality and IS that phenomenon sufficient justification for changing and/or creating more legislation. In what way does being trans interact with other people AND how much authority over their own person are they expected to cede for these people to be happy with the way in which they are being interacted with?
And as far as the health concerns are concerned, if the treatment sterilizes them, it's inconsequential because they can always adopt and/or freeze reproductive matter for later use, if estrogen increases the risk of prostate cancer, they likely would have got cancer and they die anyways, and if teaching them is has some kind of profoundly negative psychological effects, what are those effects? What is the issue there? Are they going to increase in frequency or even result in sleeping with 'wrong person?' What is, like, that maximally destructive octcome tha-OH! Right! Eternal damnation hellfire forever land. Ha! I genuinely forget that THAT is a real consequence people believe will happen in an ontological sense. Ha! That's like the whole thing right there! Ha! Biological Sex."
by Hym Iam September 01, 2023
Her cancer was a biological tyranny.
Stephen Hawking was shackled by the biological tyranny of ALS.
She believed her large mole was a biological tyranny. Most thought it was beautiful.
Stephen Hawking was shackled by the biological tyranny of ALS.
She believed her large mole was a biological tyranny. Most thought it was beautiful.
by Ontological June 25, 2018
by Not Charles Xavier December 08, 2018
A term that terfs and other bigots uses to refer to that name that was given to them by their parents on the day that they was born.
by Kara-que April 16, 2024
a method of Ancient Yoga, a natural science that can align a human's physical life or complete brain/body organism (which ideally extends to one's closest social network) to their inner/eternal/spiritual life or soul/essence/breath in order to function, develop and evolve optimally in context to their given time and space; breath control, simple meditation, the daily practice of bodily postures, individual specific physical outlets, spiritual studies, and aligning with universal biological and spiritual truths are incorporated elements.
Ex: Attachment and Conscious Non-Violent Parenting of one's own offspring or that of any orphaned earthlings is an integral part of discovering one's higher purpose through Biological-Yoga.
Ex: Attachment and Conscious Non-Violent Parenting of one's own offspring or that of any orphaned earthlings is an integral part of discovering one's higher purpose through Biological-Yoga.
I practice Biological-Yoga which is not a career accomplishment, but a method of bettering one's existence with daily practice.
by karmajohn July 11, 2018
<.7.9.7.6>Allison AMerican Beatrice Christina RObles Ferrarra Ferrara Soler Tanna, Stop Saying "'Papi'" Infront Of YOur BIological <Father>Parents<Mother>, Angel JOse RObles <&>And<&>Cristy Veronica tejada<.7.9.7.6.>
<.7.9.7.6>Allison AMerican Beatrice Christina RObles Ferrarra Ferrara Soler Tanna, Stop Saying "'Papi'" Infront Of YOur BIological <Father>Parents<Mother>, Angel JOse RObles <&>And<&>Cristy Veronica tejada<.7.9.7.6.>
by TheGeneralGenitalsPranksterian May 07, 2025