The process of centering something
by Raabe’s Definition November 26, 2020
Get the Centreize mug.by NonVerbal Sox August 8, 2023
Get the centrium mug.Related Words
Non-Centralism:
The idea that currency, government and business must be decentralised and placed in the power of the public in such a way that no central power structure is formed as a means to end corruption on all levels.
This would be an attempt at a true democracy where we do not vote others into power but vote on every affair on a regional, national and international level, therefore the public retains its power and a true democracy is achieved.
Corruption has long been an issue in society and Decentralism would fix this by not allowing one person to gain any more power than anyone else.
The ideal decentralised society would remove any bank and any federal reserve and create a decentralised world cryptocurrency that would be created based on how much people would need in their lifetime (same amount for everybody) and would be handed out automatically to everyone who is enrolled onto the system at a single payment every month.
The world would move towards automation of jobs by robotics and artificial intelligence and humans would be free to enjoy their lives and spend their time as they please.
Federal agencies such as Mi5, Mi6, the CIA and FBI and any other would have complete public oversight so as to avoid corruption in those agencies too.
To conclude, Decentalism is the most logical ideology if one is morally opposed to corruption, poverty, abuse of power and crimes against humanity.
Let Decentralism prevail before our society does fail.
The idea that currency, government and business must be decentralised and placed in the power of the public in such a way that no central power structure is formed as a means to end corruption on all levels.
This would be an attempt at a true democracy where we do not vote others into power but vote on every affair on a regional, national and international level, therefore the public retains its power and a true democracy is achieved.
Corruption has long been an issue in society and Decentralism would fix this by not allowing one person to gain any more power than anyone else.
The ideal decentralised society would remove any bank and any federal reserve and create a decentralised world cryptocurrency that would be created based on how much people would need in their lifetime (same amount for everybody) and would be handed out automatically to everyone who is enrolled onto the system at a single payment every month.
The world would move towards automation of jobs by robotics and artificial intelligence and humans would be free to enjoy their lives and spend their time as they please.
Federal agencies such as Mi5, Mi6, the CIA and FBI and any other would have complete public oversight so as to avoid corruption in those agencies too.
To conclude, Decentalism is the most logical ideology if one is morally opposed to corruption, poverty, abuse of power and crimes against humanity.
Let Decentralism prevail before our society does fail.
Non-Centralism: The idea that power and influence should not be handed to individuals in government and power should be distributed the everyone equally in order to rid society of all corruption and ways of creating corruption.
Person 1) Dude, we should totally start a revolution and decentralise the government’s and the worlds currency in order to end corruption on a worldwide scale.
Person 2) Yeah bro, but people aren’t woke enough for that at this current point in human history.
Person 1) Yeah you’re right, people are idiots, always giving their authority over to ‘officials’ without ever questioning the stupidity of it all... who makes them ‘official’ anyway.
Person 2) You know, if people thought more like this... as in, for themselves, then the world would be a lot better for everyone.
We’ve let the government ‘officials’ lie to us in every election thats ever been had and theres still children going hungry because of their greed and ignorance, it has to end somehow.
Person 1) Yeah, that’s exactly why we need to decentralise and distribute the power the governments have back to the general public as well as use a decentralised currency.
Person 1) Dude, we should totally start a revolution and decentralise the government’s and the worlds currency in order to end corruption on a worldwide scale.
Person 2) Yeah bro, but people aren’t woke enough for that at this current point in human history.
Person 1) Yeah you’re right, people are idiots, always giving their authority over to ‘officials’ without ever questioning the stupidity of it all... who makes them ‘official’ anyway.
Person 2) You know, if people thought more like this... as in, for themselves, then the world would be a lot better for everyone.
We’ve let the government ‘officials’ lie to us in every election thats ever been had and theres still children going hungry because of their greed and ignorance, it has to end somehow.
Person 1) Yeah, that’s exactly why we need to decentralise and distribute the power the governments have back to the general public as well as use a decentralised currency.
by Milton L. Rowlands January 2, 2021
Get the Non-Centralism mug.At least two types exist:
1. Person who claims to reject what they perceive as "both sides," while ignoring the realization that centrism carries the implication of embracing the virtues of both sides.
2. Person who claims to be moderate, yet exhibits a pattern of behavior that typically and exclusively defends or exempts one ideological belief from criticism.
This phrase is a tongue-in-cheek mockery, often cast upon those who lack self awareness; this flaw is commonly exhibited by those who want to be perceived as having risen above the standard, despite having obvious and often stereotypical biases.
Typically, the Enlightened Centrist takes what they perceive as a neutral position, by claiming "both sides" are flawed. However, the irony of this position is the complete disregard of the possibility that both sides sometimes may be right when it comes to certain issues. Thus, the "Enlightened Centrist" has inadvertently still chosen a partisan position while believing they have somehow conquered the conundrum of opposition.
1. Person who claims to reject what they perceive as "both sides," while ignoring the realization that centrism carries the implication of embracing the virtues of both sides.
2. Person who claims to be moderate, yet exhibits a pattern of behavior that typically and exclusively defends or exempts one ideological belief from criticism.
This phrase is a tongue-in-cheek mockery, often cast upon those who lack self awareness; this flaw is commonly exhibited by those who want to be perceived as having risen above the standard, despite having obvious and often stereotypical biases.
Typically, the Enlightened Centrist takes what they perceive as a neutral position, by claiming "both sides" are flawed. However, the irony of this position is the complete disregard of the possibility that both sides sometimes may be right when it comes to certain issues. Thus, the "Enlightened Centrist" has inadvertently still chosen a partisan position while believing they have somehow conquered the conundrum of opposition.
Person 1: I voted for Joe Biden because I hate Trump. He's much worse.
Person 2: I've seen the results of both. I would rather have had Trump.
Person 1: Both sides are bad! But, I'll pick Biden over Trump any time.
Person 2: Yeah both parties suck, but you can't deny that Trump at least helped our economy.
Person 3: Can both of you Enlightened Centrists shut up? Both of them are morons.
Person 1: Oh, yeah? Then, who did you vote for?
Person 3: Bernie Sanders.
Person 2: ... And you call us "Enlightened Centrists?"
Example 2:
Person 1: I think the Israel and Palestine conflict is dumb. Both sides should stop the fighting.
Person 2: Okay, who stops first?
Person 1. Well, obviously Israel. They're acting out a genocide of Palestinian people.
Person 2: Who started this fight though?
Person 1: Well, obviously Israel. They started it hundreds of years ago when they stole Palestinian land!
Person 2: So, Israel should stop fighting and just let Palestine take their land back?
Person 1: No, no, that's not what I'm saying. I just want the fighting to end.
Person 2: ... By having Israel take the loss. You think you're being an enlightened Centrist, but you're clearly biased.
Person 2: I've seen the results of both. I would rather have had Trump.
Person 1: Both sides are bad! But, I'll pick Biden over Trump any time.
Person 2: Yeah both parties suck, but you can't deny that Trump at least helped our economy.
Person 3: Can both of you Enlightened Centrists shut up? Both of them are morons.
Person 1: Oh, yeah? Then, who did you vote for?
Person 3: Bernie Sanders.
Person 2: ... And you call us "Enlightened Centrists?"
Example 2:
Person 1: I think the Israel and Palestine conflict is dumb. Both sides should stop the fighting.
Person 2: Okay, who stops first?
Person 1. Well, obviously Israel. They're acting out a genocide of Palestinian people.
Person 2: Who started this fight though?
Person 1: Well, obviously Israel. They started it hundreds of years ago when they stole Palestinian land!
Person 2: So, Israel should stop fighting and just let Palestine take their land back?
Person 1: No, no, that's not what I'm saying. I just want the fighting to end.
Person 2: ... By having Israel take the loss. You think you're being an enlightened Centrist, but you're clearly biased.
by Touchgrassthinkfast March 17, 2024
Get the Enlightened Centrist mug.A sex act similar to an Eiffel Tower and or spit roasted. Referring to wood or metal held between centres in a lathe but is actually a female suspended by penis's and spin around them
by doing alright tonight March 20, 2025
Get the Between centres mug.World Democratic Centralism is a practice in which political decisions reached by voting processes are binding upon all members of the world political party or of the world political council or committee. World democratic centralism is considered as the centralist wing of World Federalism, where the world democratic institutions would be able to take political decisions on the same model as democratic centralism such as the world political parties would adopt democratic centralist practices for their administrations and decisions.
"World democratic centralism is advocated by left world federalists and by several world federalists who agree there should be a party system at world level such as have a centralized world administration for deal with the world as a unified country where it is becoming necessary nowadays."
by Full Monteirism March 22, 2021
Get the World Democratic Centralism mug.