by Wakarannn January 6, 2021
A chickenshit/cowardly/ballslappy/queer sends an email to hr, without first; confronting the said offender giving them a chance to correct the issue first. Or even after said offender apologizes.
I know you apologized for saying, "How dare you milk my penis-snake with a breast-pump!", but I'm a HR Bitch, so I'm gonna rat on you.
by davedore September 20, 2014
Doing something awesome and risky that would, at a 'normal' company, be considered a H.R. Violation.
"Last Friday's company dinner was insane! A string of H.R. Violations. John ended up dirty dancing with Nancy and then we smoked weed in the parking lot. One hr violation after the other."
by giphyking September 26, 2015
Major Provisions of HR 4437
The following is a summary of the major provisions of H.R. 4437, the Border Protection, Anti-Terrorism, and Illegal Immigration Control Act of 2005. The legislation passed the House of Representatives 239-182 on Friday, December 16, 2005.
“Unlawful presence” would now be considered a crime and a felony, meaning that undocumented immigrants may have to serve jail time and would be barred from future legal status and from re-entry into the country.
Immigrants, including asylum-seekers, victims of human trafficking, victims of domestic abuse, and children who are apprehended along an international border or at a port-of-entry would be detained until such time as they are removed from the nation or otherwise provided immigration relief.
Anyone or any organization who “assists” an individual without documentation “to reside in or remain” in the United States knowingly or with “reckless disregard” as to the individual’s legal status would be liable for criminal penalties and five years in prison. This could include church personnel who provide shelter or other basic needs assistance to an undocumented individual. Property used in this act would be subject to seizure and forfeiture.
The use of expedited removal, which would permit DHS enforcement personnel to remove a potential asylum-seeker without providing an opportunity to appear before an immigration judge or qualified adjudicator, would be mandated within 100 miles of the border and within 14 days of a person’s entry into the country.
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) would be required to erect up to 700 miles of fencing along the Southwest border at points with the highest number of immigrant deaths.
State and local law enforcement are authorized to enforce federal immigration laws. State and local governments which refuse to participate would be subject to the loss of federal funding.
Asylum seekers and refugees who are convicted of a minor offense, such as petty theft, would be barred from permanent legal residence and eventual citizenship.
Document fraud would be considered an aggravated felony and would subject an asylum-seeker to deportation and bars to re-entry.
Nationals from countries who do not accept the return of aliens who commit crimes in this country would not be admitted to the United States. This would include countries such as China, Vietnam, and Cuba.
DHS would be given the authority to continue to detain individuals who have served their sentences based upon a determination that they are a “dangerous alien,” contrary to Supreme Court rulings barring indefinite detention.
The diversity visa lottery program, which allows 50,000 immigrants each year from countries around the world to permanently reside in the United States, is eliminated.
INFORMATION FROM: indymedia.org
The following is a summary of the major provisions of H.R. 4437, the Border Protection, Anti-Terrorism, and Illegal Immigration Control Act of 2005. The legislation passed the House of Representatives 239-182 on Friday, December 16, 2005.
“Unlawful presence” would now be considered a crime and a felony, meaning that undocumented immigrants may have to serve jail time and would be barred from future legal status and from re-entry into the country.
Immigrants, including asylum-seekers, victims of human trafficking, victims of domestic abuse, and children who are apprehended along an international border or at a port-of-entry would be detained until such time as they are removed from the nation or otherwise provided immigration relief.
Anyone or any organization who “assists” an individual without documentation “to reside in or remain” in the United States knowingly or with “reckless disregard” as to the individual’s legal status would be liable for criminal penalties and five years in prison. This could include church personnel who provide shelter or other basic needs assistance to an undocumented individual. Property used in this act would be subject to seizure and forfeiture.
The use of expedited removal, which would permit DHS enforcement personnel to remove a potential asylum-seeker without providing an opportunity to appear before an immigration judge or qualified adjudicator, would be mandated within 100 miles of the border and within 14 days of a person’s entry into the country.
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) would be required to erect up to 700 miles of fencing along the Southwest border at points with the highest number of immigrant deaths.
State and local law enforcement are authorized to enforce federal immigration laws. State and local governments which refuse to participate would be subject to the loss of federal funding.
Asylum seekers and refugees who are convicted of a minor offense, such as petty theft, would be barred from permanent legal residence and eventual citizenship.
Document fraud would be considered an aggravated felony and would subject an asylum-seeker to deportation and bars to re-entry.
Nationals from countries who do not accept the return of aliens who commit crimes in this country would not be admitted to the United States. This would include countries such as China, Vietnam, and Cuba.
DHS would be given the authority to continue to detain individuals who have served their sentences based upon a determination that they are a “dangerous alien,” contrary to Supreme Court rulings barring indefinite detention.
The diversity visa lottery program, which allows 50,000 immigrants each year from countries around the world to permanently reside in the United States, is eliminated.
INFORMATION FROM: indymedia.org
by carlita April 29, 2006
1. Lesley P-HR is a highly effective HR professional with the skills to excel in all environments.
2. A Lesly P-HR has been known for extreme issues with untruthful people and may throat punch them when needed to produce an outcome.
3. As an HR professional a Lesley P-HR may condone the be-heading of extreme human rights violators.
2. A Lesly P-HR has been known for extreme issues with untruthful people and may throat punch them when needed to produce an outcome.
3. As an HR professional a Lesley P-HR may condone the be-heading of extreme human rights violators.
I love our Lesley P-HR she helped me through a rough patch in my life, though she did throat punch Dave for calling off of work.
by Tag your It December 27, 2019
Saying, in essence, that you can't answer that question, since, to the Human Resources dept, it might qualify as sexual harassment to say what you really feel.
Them: So, Mike, I heard that the USTTA changed the size of ping pong balls. How big are YOUR balls? Heh heh.
Me: (smiling) HR says 'no comment'.
------
Someone else at work: So, have you met Warren's new receptionist, Julie? What do you think about her?
Me: (smiling) HR says 'no comment'. (serious face) Seriously though, she seems competent.
Me: (smiling) HR says 'no comment'.
------
Someone else at work: So, have you met Warren's new receptionist, Julie? What do you think about her?
Me: (smiling) HR says 'no comment'. (serious face) Seriously though, she seems competent.
by ChuckChaser69 June 29, 2010
Theory of HR Quantification is a revolutionary concept in managerial science which states that Human Resource Management can be operated in numerical terms and when done that it will bring sustained competitive advantage. It has established a relationship between sales and quantitative HRM in a manner never done before.
Jim: Are you aware of any new theory which has changed the world but I am not aware of it?
Michelle: mmmm, Theory of HR Quantification?
Jim: Whoo, Sounds huge.
Michelle: Yup, It has brought a turbulence in managerial science
Michelle: mmmm, Theory of HR Quantification?
Jim: Whoo, Sounds huge.
Michelle: Yup, It has brought a turbulence in managerial science
by Universe213 May 6, 2020