When one lady and another lady like each other, they mutually deicide to bump their apples together.....
Clair and Rose were bumpin apples together in the forest without either of their husband’s consent or knowledge.......
by Applebumpers June 26, 2019
Get the Bumpin apples mug.A saying commonly used by prostitutes hooked on drugs before having copious amounts of drug filled sex
by Bigdaddyslimsexy June 13, 2016
Get the Suck my apples mug.Related Words
appless
• Applessss
• Apples to Apples
• applesauced
• Appleism
• applesack
• apples and oranges
• Appleseed
• applesexual
• Applease
by redheadwonder December 9, 2008
Get the stop swimming in my applesauce mug.it is used in the term, "how do ya' like them apples?" basically meaning, "what do you think about that?" it is a phrase that intends to piss people off.
It could be used after winning high stakes in a poker game..."Royal flush baby!...How ya' like them apples?
by ScurvyJack December 28, 2005
Get the them apples mug.An unresolvable and ultimately useless comparison.
A comparison which is just as easy to support as it is to contest.
Something which is both the same and different simultaneously depending on your point of view.
alt. *Apples to Apples*--Though not the initial meaning, occasionally the phrase "apples to oranges" is used to dismiss a "distinct difference" noted between two things which are not distinctly different. IE the neverending opinion wars often attributed to brand-loyalty. These are based on imaginary chasms of vast differences which cannot be proven or conclusively settled. IN other words these things are not really very different, but people desperately want to believe they are.
A comparison which is just as easy to support as it is to contest.
Something which is both the same and different simultaneously depending on your point of view.
alt. *Apples to Apples*--Though not the initial meaning, occasionally the phrase "apples to oranges" is used to dismiss a "distinct difference" noted between two things which are not distinctly different. IE the neverending opinion wars often attributed to brand-loyalty. These are based on imaginary chasms of vast differences which cannot be proven or conclusively settled. IN other words these things are not really very different, but people desperately want to believe they are.
When someone says "you're comparing apples to oranges" they're really saying "Why are you trying to compare those things? You can't compare apples to oranges, they're just not the same thing."
They're both sweet. They're both fruit. They're both the same. But they're not. One's an apple, and one's an orange. Is that all there is to it? One tastes better. No it doesn't. Yes it does. How do you decide which one everyone likes more? How *can* you decide?
A great example of silly apples to oranges is vanilla and chocolate.
Invalid apples to oranges comparisons would be like comparing Bush or Clinton to Lincoln, Jefferson, or Washington. You can't, so don't.
Examples of useless "nonexistant-vast-differences" apples to oranges comparisons are Macs and PC's, Fords and Chevys, Nikons and Canons.. In reality this is mostly "apples to apples" comparison.
Apples to oranges usually ends with each person believing or feeling whatever they do and leaving it at that. That's all there is to it. Neither can really ever be better or worse, and nobody can win the argument.
In the end, the whole point of making the comparison is to illustrate: there is really no point in making the comparison.
They're both sweet. They're both fruit. They're both the same. But they're not. One's an apple, and one's an orange. Is that all there is to it? One tastes better. No it doesn't. Yes it does. How do you decide which one everyone likes more? How *can* you decide?
A great example of silly apples to oranges is vanilla and chocolate.
Invalid apples to oranges comparisons would be like comparing Bush or Clinton to Lincoln, Jefferson, or Washington. You can't, so don't.
Examples of useless "nonexistant-vast-differences" apples to oranges comparisons are Macs and PC's, Fords and Chevys, Nikons and Canons.. In reality this is mostly "apples to apples" comparison.
Apples to oranges usually ends with each person believing or feeling whatever they do and leaving it at that. That's all there is to it. Neither can really ever be better or worse, and nobody can win the argument.
In the end, the whole point of making the comparison is to illustrate: there is really no point in making the comparison.
by Armand Banana January 9, 2006
Get the apples to oranges mug.by fatmatt January 24, 2005
Get the apples mug.A card game originally made for small children where one matches nouns to a given adjective that somewhere along the line, as most things, got turned into a drinking game.
Person 1: Okay so for "Useless" I got Helen Keller, Anne Frank and Lima Beans. This is going to be the hardest Apples to Apples round yet.
Person 2: No way. It was harder when for delicious I had to pick between Megan Fox and Sandwiches.
Person 2: No way. It was harder when for delicious I had to pick between Megan Fox and Sandwiches.
by Naple's nipples July 9, 2010
Get the Apples to Apples mug.