she/her-ing objects

when (often self proclaimed liberal girls) assign inanimate objects she/her pronouns

it seems to be done as a feminist act ….. but haven’t women been objectified enough?

i see your yellow hydro flask with a RBG sticker, and compliment it : “oohh, she’s cute”
lighting a bowl and it catches: “oh she’s going now!”
looks at dress in mirror: “she’s giving y2k glamour”

in each scenario, “she” referring to the inanimate object - hence she/her-ing objects

by tiktoktarot444 January 2, 2022

naked woman covering with objects

when a naked woman is in public or private she grabs a object to cover her private parts

naked woman covering with objects: i need to cover with something

she grabs a thing

naked woman: phew!

it falls off

naked woman: oh no....

by IHJISHGJRGHFRHVCNSH February 13, 2024

Hard Problem of Objectivity

The myth of the view from nowhere. True objectivity would require a disembodied, ahistorical, bias-free perspective completely outside the system being observed. This is impossible for humans. Every observation is made by a situated observer with a body, a language, a culture, and a set of prior beliefs. The hard problem is that while we can approach objectivity through methods (blinding, controls, peer review), we can never fully attain it. The ideal of pure objectivity may be a necessary regulative ideal for science and ethics, but it is also a philosophical phantom.

Example: A journalist aims to report "objectively" on a political protest. But their choice of which quotes to feature, which images to show, and even the word "protest" (vs. "riot" or "demonstration") reflects a subjective framework. The hard problem: Striving for objectivity is crucial, but claiming to have achieved it is often a power move—a way of dismissing other perspectives as "subjective" or "biased." True objectivity might be the process of continually acknowledging and correcting for subjectivity, not its elimination. Hard Problem of Objectivity.

by Enkigal January 24, 2026

Fallacy of Arbitrary Objectivity

The logical error of claiming that your perspective is objective while everyone else's is biased, without providing any justification for why your viewpoint deserves the "objective" label. This fallacy is the bedrock of punditry, editorial writing, and conversations with your uncle at Thanksgiving. The person committing it positions themselves as a neutral observer floating above the fray, while everyone else is mired in ideology, emotion, or self-interest. The reality, of course, is that they're just as biased as everyone else—they've just declared their bias to be the center of the universe, which is a very convenient way to never have to examine your own assumptions.

Example: "The pundit committed the fallacy of arbitrary objectivity daily, presenting his conservative opinions as 'common sense' and 'what most Americans think' while describing liberal views as 'ideological' and 'out of touch.' He genuinely believed he was objective, which was the most objective sign that he wasn't."

by Dumu The Void February 15, 2026

Law of Spectral Objectivity

The principle that objectivity exists on a spectrum between absolute and relative, with infinite gradations and multiple dimensions. Under this law, no perspective is simply objective or subjective—each occupies a position in spectral space defined by its distance from pure bias, its acknowledgment of standpoint, its transparency about methods, its community of verification. The law of spectral objectivity recognizes that objectivity is not a binary property but a continuous quality that can be cultivated, measured, and improved. It's the foundation of methodological humility—the recognition that your objectivity is always partial, always situated, always capable of improvement.

Law of Spectral Objectivity Example: "She evaluated her own research using spectral objectivity, mapping it across dimensions: transparency about methods (high), acknowledgment of biases (medium), community verification (ongoing), distance from funding sources (good). The spectral coordinates showed where her objectivity was strong and where it needed work. She improved her practice not by seeking impossible purity but by moving along the spectrum."

by Abzugal February 16, 2026

Fallacy of Objective Reality

The fallacy of assuming that one's own perception of reality is simply "objective reality," and that anyone who disagrees is either mistaken, deluded, or lying. This fallacy collapses the distinction between appearance and reality, treating one's own perspective as the perspective. It's the epistemological version of the objectivity bias: not just believing you're right, but believing that rightness is not a matter of perspective at all—that you have direct access to the way things really are. The Fallacy of Objective Reality is beloved of those who have never encountered a worldview different from their own, or who have encountered it and found it threatening. It makes dialogue impossible because disagreement becomes not difference but error, not alternative but falsehood.

Example: "He didn't think his political views were views—they were just 'reality.' When she presented a different perspective, he didn't engage; he explained why she was wrong to see what she saw. The Fallacy of Objective Reality meant that her experience, her evidence, her reasoning—all were invalid because they didn't match his 'reality.' She gave up arguing; he declared victory."

by Dumu The Void February 20, 2026

Bias of Arbitrary Objectivity

A bias where an individual declares their own perspective to be objective while dismissing all others as biased—without any justification for why their perspective deserves the "objective" label. The bias is arbitrary because the criteria for objectivity shift to always favor the biased party: what's "objective" is whatever they believe, whatever their side says, whatever serves their interests. This bias is the foundation of punditry, of editorializing, of the confident assertion that "I'm not political, I just believe in common sense" (where common sense means my opinions). The Bias of Arbitrary Objectivity allows its holder to feel rational while being utterly unreflective, to claim neutrality while being deeply partisan. It's the bias that denies it's a bias, which is what makes it so effective and so dangerous.

Example: "He introduced himself as 'just giving the facts, no bias.' Then he spent an hour presenting one side of every issue, dismissing opposing views as 'ideological.' The Bias of Arbitrary Objectivity meant he never had to examine his own assumptions—they weren't assumptions, they were just 'reality.' When challenged, he didn't defend his views; he defended his right to be the arbiter of what counts as objective. The bias was invisible to him, which is how it worked."

by Dumu The Void February 20, 2026