Superpluralism is the intimation that human will is the subset of universal pragmatism; not pragmatism.
This indicates that universal pragmatism and intuition are self and the same.
This indicates that universal pragmatism and intuition are self and the same.
Super-pluralism, mathematically, says that a (countably) infinite lineset (set of lines) cannot be an "over" - set of an uncountable (closed) surface.
by metawave October 15, 2019
Get the Super-pluralism mug.Plutonium go boom
by smilymoney September 8, 2021
Get the Plutonium mug.Related Words
Platanium is a word you say and will get corrected by your girlfriend and spend 30 minutes trying to find that word
by Adam Testical nuts June 17, 2022
Get the platanium mug.Plutonium is like the ultimate superhero of the periodic table - it's got a glowing personality, it's always hot and it can literally blast off to start a party that you have never seen before ever! But be warned, it's not your friendly neighborhood Spiderman, it's more like the Hulk on steroids. One wrong move and you'll be hopping around like a kangaroo on fire. So, if you want to impress your friends with this explosive element, handle it with caution and always remember to keep a safe distance. Or you might end up with a party that's literally out of this world! Just remember, Plutonium is the only element that can turn your enemies into dust, and your hair into a bright shade of green, but it won't hesitate to do the same to you if you don't respect its power.
Dude X: "Plutonium is the key to becoming a superhero, bro! We'll be like the Avengers"
Dude Z: "Ah, Plutonium, with that I'd make a great superhero. I already have a cool name in mind: Pluto-Man!"
Dude X: "Pluto-Man? Well, Spider-Man got his powers from a radioactive spider. Maybe we should go look for a radioactive bug instead!"
Dude Z: "A radioactive bug? That sounds cool! Let's go for a bug hunt, but I'm still keeping my eye out for some radioactive spiders, just in case."
Dude Z: "Ah, Plutonium, with that I'd make a great superhero. I already have a cool name in mind: Pluto-Man!"
Dude X: "Pluto-Man? Well, Spider-Man got his powers from a radioactive spider. Maybe we should go look for a radioactive bug instead!"
Dude Z: "A radioactive bug? That sounds cool! Let's go for a bug hunt, but I'm still keeping my eye out for some radioactive spiders, just in case."
by adityaprasad502 April 20, 2023
Get the plutonium mug.A slightly derogatory term for a setting or place where individuals of the female persuasion (i.e. women) congregate, dressed in provocative attire to attract males.
by MadMavi41 March 23, 2024
Get the Punanium mug.A "We are the world"-Esque delusion that is both undesirable and impossible.
Hym "Pluralism requires the religions to be transformed into something they are not. If the religions are resistant to the change that pluralism requires will inevitably be disempowered. Either by the state or the communication networks. It's at that point you have a hierarchy of religious dogma, backed by the state and communications networks, and it's going to elevate the religions that more closely align with your progressive sensibilities above the religions who do not. What you are suggesting is nothing more than liberals controlling the religions with soft power from the outside in a way that allows them to deny their own culpability. What happens to the Muslim fundamentalists who think gays should be thrown off buildings? What happens to the Christian fundamentalists who object to abortion on religious grounds? They both take a backseat to the other religions that allow your liberal bullshit pluralism to dictate (from the top down) which religions can accrue power. Your pluralism IS the precursor to the hierarchy you condemn. And that was my initial criticism of the Atheist pluralists. 'The religions would be fine if they believed what I believe. I should be the God. As long as the religion is promoting my progressive politics then it's fine.'
Hym "Pluralism requires the religions to be transformed into something they are not. If the religions are resistant to the change that pluralism requires will inevitably be disempowered. Either by the state or the communication networks. It's at that point you have a hierarchy of religious dogma, backed by the state and communications networks, and it's going to elevate the religions that more closely align with your progressive sensibilities above the religions who do not. What you are suggesting is nothing more than liberals controlling the religions with soft power from the outside in a way that allows them to deny their own culpability. What happens to the Muslim fundamentalists who think gays should be thrown off buildings? What happens to the Christian fundamentalists who object to abortion on religious grounds? They both take a backseat to the other religions that allow your liberal bullshit pluralism to dictate (from the top down) which religions can accrue power. Your pluralism IS the precursor to the hierarchy you condemn. And that was my initial criticism of the Atheist pluralists. 'The religions would be fine if they believed what I believe. I should be the God. As long as the religion is promoting my progressive politics then it's fine.'
You want the moral authority for yourselves. You're trying to dress it up as this benign thing and it isn't. So no. No pluralism. The only solution to religion is to create a system that is impervious to and unaffected by believe. You can have your little incest cult and you can have your liberal politics but I, as an individual, do not have to lend any credence to your religion, don't have to do what your God says, and to discriminate against me or transgress upon me for doing so is a violation of my religious liberty. We need to get this subjective prescriptive behavior out of people's lives and turn society into an input/output mechanism where people can contribute independently from and regardless of their beliefs and receive output commensurate with their contributions. So, if THAT is what you mean by pluralism, then fine. But it doesn't sound like it. Maybe I'm missing something. Additionally, focusing on Hindu voices when speaking about Hinduism is just a way of preemptively undermining dissent against Hinduism. I can just as easily say that we should prioritize dissent."
by Hym Iam February 3, 2025
Get the Pluralism mug.A philosophical stance that argues there is no single, universal "Scientific Method." Instead, it posits that science is a diverse ecosystem of legitimate methods, theories, and practices, all capable of producing valid knowledge about different aspects of complex reality. It challenges rigid demarcation criteria that exclude fields like psychoanalysis or indigenous knowledge systems simply because they don't fit a lab-coat-and-test-tube mold. The core idea is that to understand messy phenomena (like the human mind or ecosystems), we need a toolbox, not just a hammer.
Example: The classic Scientific Pluralism debate asks if psychoanalysis is a science. A rigid "physics-only" view says no—it's not experimentally falsifiable like chemistry. A pluralist says yes—its clinical interpretive methods validly explore subjective human experience, a domain where controlled experiments fail. It's the difference between kicking a therapy couch for not being a particle accelerator and recognizing it as a different, but valid, instrument for a different kind of investigation.
by Abzugal Nammugal Enkigal February 6, 2026
Get the Pluralism mug.