wikitard

A user on a wiki page (usually being fandom) being actively annoying. Or alternatively used to address someone from within the said wiki, mostly being wiki moderators.

"This wikitard keeps griefing the wiki."

"Hey, wikitards. Come fix this up."

by elgeer November 30, 2023

Wikitard

A person who is mainly focused on editing the wiki to add more information and making post pretty often.

Example: Don't even snitch on Bool, he's such a wikitard.
Another example: Helitoaster is a wikitard, end of discussion.

by cappycattty February 12, 2024

wibtah

"would i be the asshole" , mainly used on reddit.

WIBTAH if i fucked my friends' mom?

by liukusik February 26, 2024

Wibilance

Wibilance is a form of alliteration similar to Sibilance, where the repetition of W adds a whooshing sound to the sentence/paragraph, enhancing the sonic strategy.

The use of wibilance in your piece enhances the sounds. Love it <3

by Wibilance4Life March 5, 2024

WDBITR?

"Wanna dance batchata in the rain?"

A: "Hey bae wdbitr?"
B: "OMG yes!!"

by W nature April 11, 2024

wiitar

a wiitar is a controller for guitar hero on the wii

person 1: have you seen my wiitar, i cant find it

person 2: check your room

by kfsde December 22, 2024

Wikithinking

The distinct form of groupthink that emerges from Wikipedia's core policies and the social dynamics of its editor community. It enforces a consensus-driven, citation-obsessed, and conflict-averse mindset where controversial truths are smoothed over, dissenting voices are overwhelmed by procedural arguments, and the "Neutral Point of View" (NPOV) morphs into a bias for the bland, established, and non-committal. Wikithinking values process over substance, reliable sourcing over first-hand expertise, and the avoidance of "edit wars" over the rigorous pursuit of accuracy, often producing articles that are meticulously referenced but intellectually sterile.

Example: The Wikipedia article on a contentious political figure undergoes intense Wikithinking. Editors relentlessly revert any strongly worded critique, even with solid sources, labeling it "POV pushing." They replace it with milquetoast phrasing like "has been criticized by some" and balance it with a trivial positive claim. The result is a text that is "neutral" in process but functionally sanitized, protecting the subject's reputation through the tyranny of procedural consensus.

by Dumuabzu February 5, 2026