Schrödinger’s Tiddy is the condition created when the various men in an audience simultaneously think a female performer is both too exposed and too modest at the exact same time.
(Created during rant by ashleyroboto on December 5, 2019.)
(Created during rant by ashleyroboto on December 5, 2019.)
by autopatch December 06, 2019
Person 1: Hey ur cute
Person 2: I have a significant other
Person 1: Ha no, I was just joke-flirting
Person 2: I think you mean Schrödinger's flirting
Person 2: I have a significant other
Person 1: Ha no, I was just joke-flirting
Person 2: I think you mean Schrödinger's flirting
by ScrollWasTaken November 14, 2019
Schrödinger's cock: a cock, a flask of whiskey, and a porno magazine are placed in a sealed box. If an externalal monitor detects alcohol, the flask is shattered, releasing the whiskey, which kills the boner. The Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics implies that after a while, the cock is simultaneously erect and flacid. Yet, when one looks in the box, one sees the cock either erect or flacid not both erect and flacid. This poses the question of when exactly quantum superposition ends and reality collapses into one possibility or the other.Schrödinger's cock is a thought experiment, sometimes described as a paradox, devised by Austrian physicist Erwin Schrödinger in 1935.1 It illustrates what he saw as the problem of the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics applied to everyday objects. The scenario presents a cock that may be simultaneously both erect and flacid,2345678 a state known as a quantum superposition, as a result of being linked to a random subatomic event that may or may not occur. The thought experiment is also often featured in theoretical discussions of the interpretations of quantum mechanics. Schrödinger coined the term Verschränkung (entanglement) in the course of developing the thought experiment.
by pen15inme February 19, 2018
An epic fail by Urban Dictionary as Work of the Day for Oct 4th 2014.
The definition read:
"An emoticon that shows both happy and sad faces. i.e. ):(
The Internet is a horrible and wonderful place ):( <--"
However this aforementioned emoticon does not contain a happy face; it is merely two sad faces. The correct emoticon should be either " (:( " or " ):) "
The definition read:
"An emoticon that shows both happy and sad faces. i.e. ):(
The Internet is a horrible and wonderful place ):( <--"
However this aforementioned emoticon does not contain a happy face; it is merely two sad faces. The correct emoticon should be either " (:( " or " ):) "
by eruat October 04, 2014
A guy who says offensive things and decides whether he was joking based on the reaction of people around him.
Watch out, Susie! That guy is Schrödinger's Douchebag, he’ll trap you in a thought-experiment without your consent!
by Sickomonster December 24, 2020
The subject of an experiment conducted by mad crazy quatum physics man named Schrödinger. Here is the kicker of the experiment: Most believe that Schrödinger was attempting to prove that the cat was both dead and alive at a single point in time. This is not quite true. The fellow was merely attempting to prove that the rules regarding microscopic objects (such as particles that can be in "dual states" so to speak) are in no way governed by the established laws for macroscopic objects (a cat). You see, it is well established that a cat is either A. Dead or B. Alive. Schrödinger put his cat in a solid lead box with a vial of gaseous hydrocyanic acid (HCN(g)) and a radioactive isotope with an established half life of about one hour. Because a single particle was used, the chance of it decaying was 50/50. The vial would be broken when the particle decayed, and the cat, being rather allergic to hydrocyanic acid, would die. The problem arises here. After an hour, the single radioactive particle, speaking on quatum terms, was in a dual state of decay and, eh, not decay. The laws of quatum physics say that all items in a closed system can be related with well known and well tested equations. Using these equations, the cat is in a dual state of being dead and alive. Not possible. Therefore, there can be no assumptions made regarding the relations of macroscopic objects and microscopic objects.
However, I believe the cat was just a clear cut zombie cat.
However, I believe the cat was just a clear cut zombie cat.
Schrödinger's Cat is actually so complicated that even though I tried to explain it in the simpliest terms I could, I made no sense.
by Nope4810 April 20, 2005
British English version of Schrodinger's Douchebag - "Schrödinger's Twat" is a person who says something offensive or horrible, and then, depending upon how offended his audience are, retrospectively claims it was a joke.
by Schrödinger's Twat July 23, 2015