Law's Theory of Chess References has two main points.
1. After a while, in any argument, debate or discussion, there will inevitably be a reference to a chess piece, chess tactic, chess master, or something Chess like.
“Control of the patent rights will signal checkmate to their actions against us.”
“You don’t have to be a chess master to understand how this simple pyramid scheme will make us all rich. Yes a check, make it out to cash, will be quite acceptable”
“ The Wrestler considered his suplex the best part of his end-game arsenal.”
Note: It is not a Chess reference if you refer to a disreputable rapscallion, as having a ‘Checkered past”
2. In any sporting event, no more than ten minutes into the start of any contest, one or several of the sportscasters will utter some variation of "It's a chess match, with these two coaches, every time they meet in competition."
Note in the final 2 minutes of any NBA or NCAA College Basketball game, any substitution of good rebounders, good outside shooters, taller defenders, versus best free throw percentage shooters, requires that one or more sports commentators speak these words:
1. After a while, in any argument, debate or discussion, there will inevitably be a reference to a chess piece, chess tactic, chess master, or something Chess like.
“Control of the patent rights will signal checkmate to their actions against us.”
“You don’t have to be a chess master to understand how this simple pyramid scheme will make us all rich. Yes a check, make it out to cash, will be quite acceptable”
“ The Wrestler considered his suplex the best part of his end-game arsenal.”
Note: It is not a Chess reference if you refer to a disreputable rapscallion, as having a ‘Checkered past”
2. In any sporting event, no more than ten minutes into the start of any contest, one or several of the sportscasters will utter some variation of "It's a chess match, with these two coaches, every time they meet in competition."
Note in the final 2 minutes of any NBA or NCAA College Basketball game, any substitution of good rebounders, good outside shooters, taller defenders, versus best free throw percentage shooters, requires that one or more sports commentators speak these words:
"Yet another substitution, Yes, it has become a chess match, " and the Color Commentator again paid homage to Law's Theory of Chess References before the 3rd quarter.
by knightwithoutarmoire May 07, 2020
Bijective theory of consciousness which states that a discrete surface area can be divided arbitrarily into an uncountable number of surface areas.
The attention theory of everything propounds that the Vikaasian set of uncountable primes is bijective to the Cantor set of uncountable functions.
Implies that a surface area is a number.
Furthermore implies that a surface area comprises a set of uncountable prime numbers, greater than the set of Godel primes.
Thus surface areas are not only prime; but prime-in-themselves.
Implies that a surface area is a number.
Furthermore implies that a surface area comprises a set of uncountable prime numbers, greater than the set of Godel primes.
Thus surface areas are not only prime; but prime-in-themselves.
by metawave August 22, 2020
" Theories is the best "
by get doggystyled July 25, 2021
by RandomLoser123 January 12, 2021
Nonononononono... Not talk bitch. And even if it is, we all watched my words bend reality across the globe.
Hym "99% theory. 1% potential for practical application. And as far as needing to talk to people who have done things is concerned, no. I don't. If what I'm saying it is concordant with objective reality then I am CORRECT. Yours if literally an apeal to anecdote. 'You have to accept the anecdotal experience of people regardless of whether or not it's consistent with what generally happens in reality.' Wrong! No I don't. The inverse is actually true. If what generally happens is inconsistent with your anecdotal experience, you need to cede your anecdotal experience as evidence."
by Hym Iam September 23, 2023
(noun)
People try to treat people impudently and act as if they are not accepting their punishment when other people take what they dish out but accept their punishment when people do not take what they dish out to avoid being not left off the hook. If someone tries to treat you impudently or unjustly and you just take what they dish out then that person gets to treat you impudently.
It's necessary to an extent for some humans to have someone they can treat impudently so they can blow off steam with or for some for other purposes which may be sadistic. For someone to have a certain positive emotion it is not necessarily the case that someone else has to experience an equal emotion in magnitude but negative; however, it most certainly can work that way and some people try to treat other people unjustly, impudently or just straight out wrong but do it in such a way that they can be left off the hook and in some cases get that person's consent.
People try to treat people impudently and act as if they are not accepting their punishment when other people take what they dish out but accept their punishment when people do not take what they dish out to avoid being not left off the hook. If someone tries to treat you impudently or unjustly and you just take what they dish out then that person gets to treat you impudently.
It's necessary to an extent for some humans to have someone they can treat impudently so they can blow off steam with or for some for other purposes which may be sadistic. For someone to have a certain positive emotion it is not necessarily the case that someone else has to experience an equal emotion in magnitude but negative; however, it most certainly can work that way and some people try to treat other people unjustly, impudently or just straight out wrong but do it in such a way that they can be left off the hook and in some cases get that person's consent.
John waived his right against Kelly when Kelly screwed him over, so by the universal screw over theory, he has to let Kelly off the hook when Kelly treats him impudently.
by Resbyall July 16, 2014
The theory of balls states that all living things have some sort of ball shaped organ or segment in their body. This can range from cells, bacteria, or even testicles.
“Hey have you heard of The Theory of Balls?”
“No what’s that?”
“It’s a theory that all living things have balls”
“No what’s that?”
“It’s a theory that all living things have balls”