ethical racist

It means a person can admit he's racist and still treat people of other racial groups with ethical values, respect and politeness.

''Yeah, I'm a racist. I also treat people of other racial groups with respect and care. I'm an ethical racist".

by Magnumb,Private Eye September 15, 2022

Ethical Obligation

I don't know it wouldn't be hard to say that your CONFLATING "criticism" with the thing you're ACTUALLY DOING.

Hym "You're a licensed professional and, therefore, have an ethical obligation to (either) do or not do certain things. You're freedom of speech does not give you the right to use speech as a mechanism to commit and/or participate in crime. This is something that a man who believes that 'the only TRUE consent is marriage' should understand. What you're doing is like feinting interest in your daughter and then banging her out without committing (which is exactly whats I WILL do in the future) OR lying and pretending to be Hym to get women (which probably works because I'm very erotic but STILL TECHNICALLY FRAUD). But where is the trial video. You said you would post a trial video and I have yet to see a trial video. That was a lie. You lied blatantly. You YELLED the lie. You said 'YOU THINK I WON'T POST IT!?' And I said 'Yes. Especially if it names me.' And then that's what happened. The thing I said. What you fail to understand is that MY thing didn't count. Your thing DOES count."

by Hym Iam August 25, 2023

Ethical Model

An ‘Ethical Model’ is someone with ethical beliefs and values and who wishes to make the world a better place through their work, activism, social media, and other platforms.

- We represent all kinds of ethical models: shapes, sizes, colors, ages, disabilities.
- Ethical models are the voices for positive change.

by Kiko H December 8, 2020

Ethical Emotivism

Your faux ethical dilemma regarding the organ transplant can only exist in a vaccum (Though you may be right that people do ENGAGE IN ethical emotivism). As I see it, your proposition isn't a singular linear line of reasoning. How you're thinking about it seems to be this: If you can -1 to +5 should you do that. But really your proposition is the intersection of several constituent elements regarding personal property rights (Does the person own their organs), consent (Is it ethical to take something from someone else without consent), authority (Is it ethical for a "We" to have authority over an individual). So, if yes (you ought to take the organs) do you have to reconcile with the constituent elements of the proposition? If it's ethical for "a group to take the organs from 1 to save 5 people" is it, then, also ethical for "a group to take the property of an individual without their consent" (in a broader sense)? Or are you just making a 1 time exception for this guy? Or is whether or not it's ethical contingent on what you're taking and whether or not you're saving lives? You see the distinction I'm trying to make, right? Maybe I'm not understanding it properly.

Hym "To me it just sounds like a repackaging of the trolley problem. And I don't see how it's incompatible with utilitarianism because if you aim to maximize pleasure then it's either a total of 1 unit of pleasure (1 person who continues to live so they can experience pleasure) or 5 units... Maybe I'm misinterpreting what you're saying... I guess the distinction between the trolly problem and your thing IS the intersection of constituent elements. Rather than just deciding whether or not to switch the tracks you're deliberately putting a guy ON THE TRACK. So it's a little more direct I guess... You're slightly more culpable in the outcome... That's a good one though. That aside, I think ethical emotivism is something people engage in rather than the default. I do still think you can create a mathematical ethical scale. Like my thing! I kill a kid (-2), you kill me (-1), I get my stuff back (+1). That's all I got for now. Bring it back up later maybe I'll come up with something else. Hopefully that isn't too incoherent to understand."

by Hym Iam March 14, 2024

Ethical gooning

To goon to fictional characters while understanding their complexity and character arcs.

M1: Yes i understand Yoko littners character and yes i still beat it to her.
M2: dude thats some ethical gooning

by FernGmod June 21, 2025

The most ethical and moral

If you qualify what you're doing with this statement... It makes it perfectly fine.

Child molester "I conduct child molestation in the most ethical and moral way possible! I do what I like to call a 'Knock' where I tap my weiner on their butthole BEFORE I molest them to let them know their about to be molested."

Serial Killer "You see, I murder women in the most ethical and moral way possible. More so than any other serial killer."

Slave owner "I'm the most ethical and moral slave owner this side of the Mississippi. Yeah I'm doing what I'm doing. But I'm doing it in the most ethical and moral way possible."

by Hym Iam February 28, 2024

Ethical Gooner

A gooner who only goons to Rule 34 of a fictional character that they understand and that they know is over the age of 18.

Hey wanna goon to Jaiden Animations?
Nah, I'm an ethical gooner, I only goon to fictional characters. Can we goon to Fenneko instead?

by Kkkiiirrrbbbyyy February 12, 2025