by SuperSonicX August 23, 2004
The reason people label those "punk rawk" bands on MTV as posers, is because those bands = posers.
Punk died in the 1980s. I wish they'd stop trying to resurrect it. I've debated this over and over. Punk is dead, kids. Get over it.
Now, I bet some of you will ask, "Zack, why does this matter?". I'll tell you why this matters. It matters because the genre is dead, and now the bands who claim they are punk are NOT a part of this genre, they are a sub-genre of pop, which is why it's called "POP-Punk". It's popular to like this new "punk rawk", and quite frankly, the record execs are only making money off this new "genre" they've created.
"But these bands are REAL punks! LOLOMG!"
Sorry, kid. No, they aren't. Punk died before you were born, I'm sure.
I'm not saying that anyone shouldn't listen to this new, pro-found genre of "music", that's up to them.
I'm just saying that punk rock is dead, because it is.
Bands of this new "genre" do nothing but whine their damn heads off. This new "genre" is basically a sped up version of emo music. Oh man, do I HATE emo music. It's not for me. I don't like listening to guys who sound like they got sacked in the nutsack by a football player whining about how their girlfriends left them for the guy who works in the donut shop.
Thanks, but no thanks.
I don't mean to sound rude, but i'm tired of listening to these MTV-watching 12 year olds who think Simple Plan and Good Charlotte are the best PUNK bands ever.
These kids don't know the real punk bands, because the REAL punk bands hardly ever got any airtime on radio.
Punk died in the 1980s. I wish they'd stop trying to resurrect it. I've debated this over and over. Punk is dead, kids. Get over it.
Now, I bet some of you will ask, "Zack, why does this matter?". I'll tell you why this matters. It matters because the genre is dead, and now the bands who claim they are punk are NOT a part of this genre, they are a sub-genre of pop, which is why it's called "POP-Punk". It's popular to like this new "punk rawk", and quite frankly, the record execs are only making money off this new "genre" they've created.
"But these bands are REAL punks! LOLOMG!"
Sorry, kid. No, they aren't. Punk died before you were born, I'm sure.
I'm not saying that anyone shouldn't listen to this new, pro-found genre of "music", that's up to them.
I'm just saying that punk rock is dead, because it is.
Bands of this new "genre" do nothing but whine their damn heads off. This new "genre" is basically a sped up version of emo music. Oh man, do I HATE emo music. It's not for me. I don't like listening to guys who sound like they got sacked in the nutsack by a football player whining about how their girlfriends left them for the guy who works in the donut shop.
Thanks, but no thanks.
I don't mean to sound rude, but i'm tired of listening to these MTV-watching 12 year olds who think Simple Plan and Good Charlotte are the best PUNK bands ever.
These kids don't know the real punk bands, because the REAL punk bands hardly ever got any airtime on radio.
True punk bands: The Ramones, The Clash, Bad Religion, Black Flag
Posers: Blink 182, Simple Plan, Good Charlotte, New Found Glory, the list goes on...
Posers: Blink 182, Simple Plan, Good Charlotte, New Found Glory, the list goes on...
by SuperSonicX February 13, 2005
by SuperSonicX August 23, 2004
by SuperSonicX September 25, 2006
My brain's secured in my nutshell.
by SuperSonicX September 24, 2006
by SuperSonicX September 18, 2005
Hilary Duff is talentless, with a bad voice to boot, and an obnoxious teen-queen attitude. The worst pop star in the entire world (or one of them). Her music is as artificial as virtual reality and her movies are horrible! I mean, she's a total fake blonde and a poser punk/goth. Hilary Duff is not talented whatsoever. She can't sing or act and that's that. The fact that she has a record deal and movie contracts instead of the many other talented people out there proves that you don't have to be good at anything to be recognized for something. On top of that, Hilary doesn't even write her own songs, nor does she actually sing for her fans at concerts (lip synching is a talent that she DOES possess). Her voice is horrible, despite the digital altering. If you ask me, Hilary doesn't deserve stardom. I find "artists" like Hilary Duff insulting to the truly talented singers and entertainers today. A lot of artists' voices are enhanced through technology, and are backed up.. or should I say "covered up" with backup voices. She is a talentless waste of an artist and people like her are taking up space on tv and the airwaves instead of real musicians who aren't given a chance. Her singing is obviously artificial and her music is such trite junk. She makes me want to vomit simply on the fact alone that she can't sing, much less is only popular by association, has terrible music written FOR her and the fact that she lip synchs.
by SuperSonicX September 13, 2005