Refers to a "just as bad or worse" substitution-product/activity employed to supposedly "fill the void" created by a discontinued unhealthy habit --- the idea here is that while the milk itself may indeed be low-fat, the added calorie-rich and sugary-sweet chocolate has far more fattening ingredients than just the cream in full-fat milk could possibly have contained, and so the person will likely gain even more weight than ever.
Three classic --- and very tragic --- examples of a "chocolate-milk alternative" would be a substance-abuse recovery-program's giving a dry-drunk lots of high-sugar foods in place of alcohol, someone's switching to compulsive shopping in place of gambling, or a person's becoming harshly-snappy and irritably-demanding after giving up cigarettes.
by QuacksO November 05, 2018
Often when an adult snortingly grumbles that, "Even a baby could do it!" when a child either doesn't understand instructions or is too timid/weak to perform some action, the truth is that the grownup is **himself** not able to explain or carry out the task, either, and so he is merely trying to make himself feel better by verbally putting down the poor innocent child. Pathetic.
by QuacksO July 23, 2019
I love visiting Hawaii, and I always enjoy being welcomingly greeted by lots of lovely brown-skinned damsels; I was warned about da possibility of maleise, though, and so da way I avoid dat hazard is to "pass along" (i.e., take them off and place them around other tourists' necks) some of my flower-necklaces if I accumulate more than three or four of dem in a short period.
by QuacksO June 24, 2021
In da Laurel & Hardy film, "Oliver The Eighth", it is stated dat da "black widow" had offed da previous seven dudes named Oliver who had courted her; Ollie is therefore extremely fortunate to have been a sirvivor of her identically-murderous plans for him, as well.
by QuacksO November 03, 2024
by QuacksO May 17, 2020
Refers to either:
(1) The choicest doe in the herd for the antlered stud to have a good ol' bouncy-bouncy session with, or
(2) The ratio of cost vs. overall sexual pleasure/enjoyment offered by each of the "available" or "willing" ladies in a dude's general locale, i.e., which gal offers the greatest overall "satisfaction package" (beauty, brains, boobs, etc.) for the least amount of monetary investment.
(1) The choicest doe in the herd for the antlered stud to have a good ol' bouncy-bouncy session with, or
(2) The ratio of cost vs. overall sexual pleasure/enjoyment offered by each of the "available" or "willing" ladies in a dude's general locale, i.e., which gal offers the greatest overall "satisfaction package" (beauty, brains, boobs, etc.) for the least amount of monetary investment.
Generally speaking, the more gorgeous or "hot" a lady is, the more expensive she will be to date intimately. However, if you don't mind a gal with relatively minor aesthetic/personality drawbacks such as lots of freckles, some extra padding, slight overbite, or loud/airheaded/childish behavior, or if you're tolerant of mild-to-moderate physical/mental/emotional issues like thick glasses, a cane, an awkward stride, confusion/distress over simple matters, oddball interests, irrational phobias, etc., there may likely be one or more quite-attractive gals in your area who are currently "unattached" because most guys tend to pass them over for someone more outwardly desirable, but who would actually provide the best bang for the buck because they are both delightful to be around and don't expect to be financially pampered all that much.
by QuacksO February 21, 2018
The "ultimate" bu**s**t excuse for unfairly getting out of an obligation/responsibility that the rest of us "normal" people have to practice/endure in everyday life.
Some people think that all they have to do is say that they have a "medical condition" or "allergy", and that this instantly/indisputably obligates everyone around them to allow for any and all unacceptable/disgusting/obnoxious/selfish behavior, or exempts them from performing certain common-courtesy actions the way the rest of the populous is expected to do! What a farce --- it allows perfectly-capable people to grossly misbehave socially, while at the same time causing those of us who do indeed legitimately suffer from certain debilitating illnesses/infirmities to be looked down upon and shown less tolerance/acceptance than we should receive, since others are already seething with resentful aggravation at all of the fakes out there to whom they are already being forced to needlessly kowtow.
by QuacksO October 22, 2018