Definitions by Hym Iam
Acknowledgement
No you're just refusing to acknowledge anything other than the identity politics. Turning a blind eye to the satan inside. If you will.
Hym "You have a real problem with acknowledgement. You won't acknowledge anything other than the identity politics. And when you do it's always "Well those are complicated problems and we don't know what to do about it... We could monopolize energy production in 3rd world countries to fix climate change! We'll... Wait what was I supposed to say again fracking billionaire who signs my contract? Oh right, We'll frack them. Frack those 3rd world countries right in the butthole. Conservatism is fine in theory but it's the implementation that always falls flat. It parallels religion in that respect. And, really? You think religious shunning better than woke nerd shunning? I'm glad you've decided to start making things easier for me. This is way easier than what I usually do. You're Conservative inclusion is little more recruiting people to subordinate themselves to your (God's) will."
Acknowledgement by Hym Iam February 27, 2023
Lack of my ethos
Yep! You nailed it! Poverty is the result of lack of YOUR ethos and not the hoarding of competence. EVERYONE IS MORE LIKELY TO BE POOR JORDAN. Poor is a relative term. Who is likely to be poor? Everyone. In comparison to who? The guy shooting their money into space. The guy doing coke after his concert and slutting out 10's of thousands of women apparently. Yeah, it was the money that was making Russel's life miserable. I'm sure Amber is loving life right now with a cocaine addiction and no money. She's much happier without it. Without a doubt! And Motely Crue sucks. You know how many people would not be rich if the broader population shared my music or entertainment palette? Only Rick Ruben and Dan Harmon would have any money. Them and some Japanese writers and musicians. Wouldn't buy a tesla. Only GameStop would stay in business. Gamestop and the closest grocery store to my house. The list goes on.
Hym "Of course it's just 'lack of my ethos'! You're an ethos salesman (After all)! It's your UNIDIMENSIONAL solution to everything! And you're right! I did your book and now I'm sitting on millions of dollars worth of un-cashed checks! Hurray Ryūsui Gansai-ken!"
Lack of my ethos by Hym Iam February 27, 2023
Matriarchy 2
Like the velociraptor from Jurassic park... Clever girl... (I think that's a reference. Now go! Find it! We're canonically playing find the reference still! Remember!? Remember that thing I said before!? That still applies! Or DOES it!? OoOoOoOoOoOo!)
Hym "Real cute... It's cute, really... Reeeeeeeeaal cute-"
Iam "What are you talking about!?"
Hym "The matriarchy 2... Somebody thought she was a fucking smarty-pants didn't she? No no no it's cute. Doesn't work on me but cute... Reeeeeeal-"
Iam "STOP SAYING CUTE! Jesus!"
Hym 😑 "......... Cute."
Iam 😮 💨
Iam "What are you talking about!?"
Hym "The matriarchy 2... Somebody thought she was a fucking smarty-pants didn't she? No no no it's cute. Doesn't work on me but cute... Reeeeeeal-"
Iam "STOP SAYING CUTE! Jesus!"
Hym 😑 "......... Cute."
Iam 😮 💨
Matriarchy 2 by Hym Iam February 27, 2023
Junkies
And there are plenty of rich junkies dawg. Are you kinding me? Nikki sixx? Russell brand (not any more but still)? Everyone on Epstien's list? Joe biden's son? You're perfectly fine with people spending their money on impulsive pleasure! You're not doing anything to stop ANY them from indulging in their impulsive pleasures. You're paying to feed their addiction every time you buy a ticket or vote for Biden (not that you would vote for Biden). Like the redistribution of wealth, the spending of money on impulsive pleasure is already happening. You dare use my own spells against me Potter? Did you think that would stump me? So what makes Russel so special? He's one of the special golden chosen people! He SHOULD have all of the money because he deserves it more. *Insert existential superiority claim here* He can... read the things I write... Like... Real good dawg... So he can do all the drugs he wants... And then use his money to go to a place to get off the drugs... and then live off the money forever... and generate wealth with his likeness...
Hym "Saying we can't give poor people money because they will spend it on drugs and become junkies is like saying we can't let anybody go to a Motely Crew concert because they are going to spend the money on drugs. Ridiculous. The position of redistributing money is may simplistic but your position is ridiculous.'
Capitalism
The problem with it is that the bureaucracy is an apathetic floodgate against the perpetual need of the populous rather than expedient service providing system. The same with the Healthcare system.
Hym "Ok, to use that as an example is so intellectually dishonest. 'If we give poor people money they'll end up coked out in a ditch' The people who are doing that are already going to do that. You just demolished your own argument with Ben's gun control argument. 'We can't ban guns because bad people will get guns anyway'. The people who would be junkies are already junkies. So, nobody gets any money just because some people will use the money for evil!? I might need money to not die one day! Now replace the word money... with the word gun... Here- I'll just do it for you. 'So, nobody gets any guns just because some people will us the money for evil!? I might need guns to not die one day!' See that? It may be primitive but at least it's not self-defeating. How much did they give to elon in carbon credits? Is it more than 3 billion?
Hym "Ok, to use that as an example is so intellectually dishonest. 'If we give poor people money they'll end up coked out in a ditch' The people who are doing that are already going to do that. You just demolished your own argument with Ben's gun control argument. 'We can't ban guns because bad people will get guns anyway'. The people who would be junkies are already junkies. So, nobody gets any money just because some people will use the money for evil!? I might need money to not die one day! Now replace the word money... with the word gun... Here- I'll just do it for you. 'So, nobody gets any guns just because some people will us the money for evil!? I might need guns to not die one day!' See that? It may be primitive but at least it's not self-defeating. How much did they give to elon in carbon credits? Is it more than 3 billion?
It's bad for people to shoot the government's (The people's) money into their arms but the greatest thing ever when they shoot it into space? So, no, that's not a reason to NOT redistribute wealth to the bottom of the hierarchy. Yes the money is already being redistributed BUT where is it being redistributed to a place that it SHOULDN'T BE? (See the through-line there?) That's the core issue here. Does elon need it more than any random poor person? To NOT GO BANKRUPT? Yes... Yes, absolutely... In general? No. I also don't think that the redistribution need to come from the government, but rather, the employers or from the employers by way of the government. If the government is giving you money (in any form) you should be paying it back to the people the government to the money from.... I forgot to use the word 'Capitalism'... Oops... Aw shit... Too many characters..."
Capitalism by Hym Iam February 27, 2023
Middle-ground fallacy
The mistaken belief that the truth lies somewhere in between to opposing propositions.
Man "It's the women!"
Woman "It's the men!"
Sophist "Well... *Insert middle-ground fallacy*"
Hym "Wrong! I can prove it! By asking a simple question: What is the selection criteria? If it is 6ft tall (14.5%), Six figure salary (17%), 6 inch+ dick (16%) and we omit overlap and assume women are willing to settle for 1 out of the 3, we have only 47% of men who can meet the selection criteria. If THAT is what constitutes 'The best man available' (in the context of hypergamy) AND if we assume that Jordan is correct in saying that they should all just get married and start a family, What are the OTHER 53% of women supposed to do? For that to work, over HALF the women STILL have to CHANGE THEIR SELECTION CRITERIA. What then? How is that supposed to work? The women don't WANT to do it and are TOLD NOT TO BY PARENTS WHO WANT THEM TO HAVE THE BEST PARTNER AVAILABLE. The men who have overlapping qualities don't have to do it so their opinions are unlimited. And here we are...
Man "It's the women!"
Woman "It's the men!"
Sophist "Well... *Insert middle-ground fallacy*"
Hym "Wrong! I can prove it! By asking a simple question: What is the selection criteria? If it is 6ft tall (14.5%), Six figure salary (17%), 6 inch+ dick (16%) and we omit overlap and assume women are willing to settle for 1 out of the 3, we have only 47% of men who can meet the selection criteria. If THAT is what constitutes 'The best man available' (in the context of hypergamy) AND if we assume that Jordan is correct in saying that they should all just get married and start a family, What are the OTHER 53% of women supposed to do? For that to work, over HALF the women STILL have to CHANGE THEIR SELECTION CRITERIA. What then? How is that supposed to work? The women don't WANT to do it and are TOLD NOT TO BY PARENTS WHO WANT THEM TO HAVE THE BEST PARTNER AVAILABLE. The men who have overlapping qualities don't have to do it so their opinions are unlimited. And here we are...
What can men do about any of that? 'Try your best!'? 'Strife nobly into the dawn!'?Only 17% of the men CAN have jobs that pay 6 figures or more because THERE ARE A FINITE NUMBER OF JOBS THAT PAY THAT MUCH. What, do you expect them to increase the pay rate of a broader number of job to 6 figures? McDonald's cashier 100,000 a year. Then you can finally get a girlfriend. The other 2 are a roll of the dice. How is it at all men's fault? What is the selection criteria? Broadly? And that middle-ground fallacy applies to the schizophrenia thing too! It's not a matter of 'well, maybe it's a little of both'. At this point it's 'yeah, they're doing the thing they are doing and they have been doing it for years, and now I'm hyper-vigilant about it so I'm looking for it everywhere!' I don't claim to be right all of the time about it. And as a thought experiment I respond to things as though they were said to or about me. But that's not the same!"
Middle-ground fallacy by Hym Iam February 27, 2023
Scanners
WOOOOOOOOAAAAAAAAAHHHH!!! Holy shit man! That was crazy! That was awesome! That is insane! What the hell, I.... Is that what a "cronenberg" is? Like a reference to the director? That's crazy dawg wow! That contents of that movie that is on Hbo Max are insane!
Hym "Holy shit we're like a 'scanners'! We're like a Benjamin Pierce! Except not crazy! And not dead! And stronger than the main character!"
Iam "You my entire life, when people make reference to scanners, I have been conflating it with 'a scanner darkly' and I couldn't see what all the fuss was about but holy shit man! That was insane!"
Hym " 'A scanner darkly'!? I remember we thought 'What is the fucking point of all this' when we watched it."
Iam "You my entire life, when people make reference to scanners, I have been conflating it with 'a scanner darkly' and I couldn't see what all the fuss was about but holy shit man! That was insane!"
Hym " 'A scanner darkly'!? I remember we thought 'What is the fucking point of all this' when we watched it."