Choose to fuck a retard instead of him. He might spend his last paycheck on a shotgun but big floppy dicks feel good.
Choose to fuck a retard at work. Because laundry is something you should be doing at home but finding someone with a big cock to shove in you should be done at work. With a cripple.
by Hym Iam November 12, 2020

And how do we know you aren't conflating psychogenic epidemic with cultural fad for the purpose of perpetuating your own partisan hackery?
Hym "Appeal to authority Jordan. You're appealing to your own authority and vaguely citing studies regarding psychogenic epidemics but that doesn't mean transgenderism IS that."
Jordan "But I'm familiar with a study though! And muh authority! And the asterisk at the end of everythIng I say is literally just a qualifing statement where I just assert that what I'm saying is 'obviously correct' and then sycophants on the internet reinforce it with inane sophistry and gaslight their audiences into believing me!"
Jordan "But I'm familiar with a study though! And muh authority! And the asterisk at the end of everythIng I say is literally just a qualifing statement where I just assert that what I'm saying is 'obviously correct' and then sycophants on the internet reinforce it with inane sophistry and gaslight their audiences into believing me!"
by Hym Iam August 20, 2023

Hym "Not that I'm not flattered... But I would like to be paid for that 🤷 I don't think that's unfair. I did always say that I would be narcissistic Superman. And now I am. I am the Homelander and I can do what ever the fuck I want."
by Hym Iam July 12, 2022

Hym *Hums "I don't... Need a... Cure for Me"* "🎶Da da da dada da dada🎶 Eat a dick Sam Harris. You fucking jew bitch. 🎶Da da da dada da dada🎶"
by Hym Iam February 23, 2025

Part 2
Hym "It just brings me back to one of my earlier points though because they really shouldn't be making fun of anybody in any kind of serious way. I mean really. Look at that shit 👆 That's all reality. That's where you live. One of the guys wasn't rich until after I started writing. Has proven that he's read my work. But conveniently enough he didn't read the part about people throwing money and attractive women and owning a casino? At what point does it stop being 'them doing it ironically' and start becoming 'Oh holy shit Newt Gingrich is unironically using my rhetoric to recruit interns'? At what point am I just better? The best comedian tells my joke and it's only funny because he said it? We're already past that point. You got people straight-up making a living off of this. Look at this guy! He's supposed to be better than everyone. That's his whole thing! He has what he has because he deserves it more. Except, wait! That's a lie! He has what he has because he lives a curated existence where he is sheltered from failure and scrutiny (of a type that is not politically motivated). Like a retard in a group home! That's why we're at odds! Because he sees himself in the retard. See? It all ties together. Everything is a retard in a group home. That's the new name of this project! 'Critical Retard in a Group Home Theory' "
Hym "It just brings me back to one of my earlier points though because they really shouldn't be making fun of anybody in any kind of serious way. I mean really. Look at that shit 👆 That's all reality. That's where you live. One of the guys wasn't rich until after I started writing. Has proven that he's read my work. But conveniently enough he didn't read the part about people throwing money and attractive women and owning a casino? At what point does it stop being 'them doing it ironically' and start becoming 'Oh holy shit Newt Gingrich is unironically using my rhetoric to recruit interns'? At what point am I just better? The best comedian tells my joke and it's only funny because he said it? We're already past that point. You got people straight-up making a living off of this. Look at this guy! He's supposed to be better than everyone. That's his whole thing! He has what he has because he deserves it more. Except, wait! That's a lie! He has what he has because he lives a curated existence where he is sheltered from failure and scrutiny (of a type that is not politically motivated). Like a retard in a group home! That's why we're at odds! Because he sees himself in the retard. See? It all ties together. Everything is a retard in a group home. That's the new name of this project! 'Critical Retard in a Group Home Theory' "
by Hym Iam January 29, 2023

Yeah, the grey area is broader than I had initially thought don't snap your spine patting yourself on the back. And yeah I'm getting to it I'm spinning a lot of plates here. I have like 20 other tabs open with other things I'm actively thinking about at the moment. I'm getting to it fuck-face, relax!
Hym "As far as the biological sex rant is concerned, I didn't realize the multiplicity of ways in which a person can be intersex and it obfuscates the ontology of the matter. And what I mean by that is that even if it's true that there is a way in which an XY chromosome person can be genetically male but phenotypically appear female (And can, therefore, be both male and female) but you still have to reconcile fact that the way in which SOME trans-people ARE 'Trans' is in an abstract one. So, the XY chromosome, phenotypically female (Or male I guess I'm sure it happens in reverse) is both male and female in an ontological sense.
The trans-person has no consistent genetic marker so we have to look at the epistemology. And I've already done this. I talk about the ways in which a person can be temperamentally more feminine or masculine (Women tend to be high in trait agreeableness and higher in neuroticism, therefore, a man who is both uniquely high in agreeableness and neuroticism would be temperamentally more 'feminine' than all men AND some women and could, therefore,
Hym "As far as the biological sex rant is concerned, I didn't realize the multiplicity of ways in which a person can be intersex and it obfuscates the ontology of the matter. And what I mean by that is that even if it's true that there is a way in which an XY chromosome person can be genetically male but phenotypically appear female (And can, therefore, be both male and female) but you still have to reconcile fact that the way in which SOME trans-people ARE 'Trans' is in an abstract one. So, the XY chromosome, phenotypically female (Or male I guess I'm sure it happens in reverse) is both male and female in an ontological sense.
The trans-person has no consistent genetic marker so we have to look at the epistemology. And I've already done this. I talk about the ways in which a person can be temperamentally more feminine or masculine (Women tend to be high in trait agreeableness and higher in neuroticism, therefore, a man who is both uniquely high in agreeableness and neuroticism would be temperamentally more 'feminine' than all men AND some women and could, therefore,
get the sensation that they are not the thing they present as phenotypically and seek to remediate that) AND I consider how THAT PHENOMENON interacts with sexuality.
But IS that sensation congruent with objective reality and IS that phenomenon sufficient justification for changing and/or creating more legislation. In what way does being trans interact with other people AND how much authority over their own person are they expected to cede for these people to be happy with the way in which they are being interacted with?
And as far as the health concerns are concerned, if the treatment sterilizes them, it's inconsequential because they can always adopt and/or freeze reproductive matter for later use, if estrogen increases the risk of prostate cancer, they likely would have got cancer and they die anyways, and if teaching them is has some kind of profoundly negative psychological effects, what are those effects? What is the issue there? Are they going to increase in frequency or even result in sleeping with 'wrong person?' What is, like, that maximally destructive octcome tha-OH! Right! Eternal damnation hellfire forever land. Ha! I genuinely forget that THAT is a real consequence people believe will happen in an ontological sense. Ha! That's like the whole thing right there! Ha! Biological Sex."
But IS that sensation congruent with objective reality and IS that phenomenon sufficient justification for changing and/or creating more legislation. In what way does being trans interact with other people AND how much authority over their own person are they expected to cede for these people to be happy with the way in which they are being interacted with?
And as far as the health concerns are concerned, if the treatment sterilizes them, it's inconsequential because they can always adopt and/or freeze reproductive matter for later use, if estrogen increases the risk of prostate cancer, they likely would have got cancer and they die anyways, and if teaching them is has some kind of profoundly negative psychological effects, what are those effects? What is the issue there? Are they going to increase in frequency or even result in sleeping with 'wrong person?' What is, like, that maximally destructive octcome tha-OH! Right! Eternal damnation hellfire forever land. Ha! I genuinely forget that THAT is a real consequence people believe will happen in an ontological sense. Ha! That's like the whole thing right there! Ha! Biological Sex."
by Hym Iam September 01, 2023

Hym "BOOOOOOOOOOO! Make the cripple pay incest freak! BOOOOOOOOOOO!"
*KAH! KAH! KAH!*
Hym "Oh shit! Somebody got em! Hurray!"
*KAH! KAH! KAH!*
Hym "Oh shit! Somebody got em! Hurray!"
by Hym Iam August 30, 2025
