Definitions by Hym Iam
Leg up
I mean, you would be able to say that if I was getting credit for the hypertext and all of the derivative media but I'm not.
Hym "You would be able to say I got a leg up from Todd Phillips if I got the credit but I didn't. So we actually know what would have happened if I had gotten a leg up. So, BECAUSE I DIDN'T get a leg up, I created AI WITHOUT a leg up. And now no one wants to give me any credit because it COULDN'T have been them. It's the exact opposite of the thing you said Chris. So, you're right Chris. I guess I was wrong. I didn't need all of the shit Noah was being handed. I just needed some Adderall and some free time. And now I don't have either! And I have fluid in my brains. I can hear it sloshing around in my ear when I swallow and feel the pressure building up in my skull. So, guess I should be thanking you really. For leaving me to suffer while you monetize my ideas for yourself. You're clearly a fantastic guy and are not just a short, soy version of Andrew Tate."
Problem
Hym "My problem with you is that you're supposed to be saving me, bitch! What is the point of all that working out if you aren't going to carry me to the hospital!? You amd Brett fucking. She's too busy getting piped and YOU are just... I don't even know what the fuck you are doing! Chumming it up with the guy who is doing the thing I said not to do? This is why the global genocide Chris. It all needs to end! We need to push the planet into the sun and call it quits. Humanity suicide pact."
Fupa
Hym "I gotta lose some weight. My fupa is all up in the way right now... But I can't do that until I get the fluid out of my brain so like and subscribe so I can get this shit out of my head because it does not feel good. And for every donation of $5 or more I will both buy and or eat a steak! Together we can destroy my fupa and/or God!"
Theoretical
Hym "My contribution to AI can be both theoretical and material (like the theory of gravity) and that doesn't require everything I've done to be both theoretical and material. That one is and the other one is not."
Theoretical by Hym Iam February 4, 2025
5th amendment
Well, it look like your pal there is complicit in the theft of intellectual property related to the current AI model. My contribution, no matter how small it SEEMS, brought AI into the mainstream and is the difference between it working the way it does now and is, therefore, cardinal to it's function. The problem of perception. The idea that you would need a massive data set and the allusion to a scaling disparity between the AI and the human brain (specifically the conversion rate between sensory data and the hippocampus). And the compression algorithm to cut down on the energy cost. All of these, posted with the intent to be published and copyrighted at the point of insemination but diverted to a place to which I have no access for the purpose of profiting off of my unpaid labor and from my property.
Hym "Your job is to uphold the constitution. And as per the 5th amendment of the constitution, a government employee is complicit (knowingly or otherwise) in taking my property without providing me due compensation. And that's just my 5th amendment grievance. There's also the violation of my privacy that continues to happen to this day. I'm clearly being surveilled in some capacity. Therefore, I am hereby invoking the privacy act of 1974 which requires government agencies to show an individual any records kept on him or her as it is clear to me my name and location are being disclosed without my written consent. The person diverting this very post (to where it goes after I hit send) is also culpable in the disclosure of OTHER PEOPLE'S NAMES, without THEIR written consent. As I do not intend for this to be diverted away from me, this is something for which I am not responsible. If said surveillance is in any way punitive, I have yet to be charged with a crime and have, therefore, had my 4th amendment rights violated. Whatever perceived threat I pose is (at this point) entirely theoretical and cannot be considered justification for surveillance as I have been denied my right to habeas coprus as per the 4th amendment. That. Do that. That is your job. And the job of your colleagues. You should all be doing this and have had 9 years to do it."
5th amendment by Hym Iam February 4, 2025
Myself
You do not need me to change anything about myself. What you WANT is to control MYSELF and you're trying to reconfigure what constitutes CONTROL and SELF to make that happen.
Hym "But what YOU ARE MAKING MONEY OFF OF is MYSELF. You didn't need MYSELF to change anything to fill your bank account with my ideas. So, you don't need myself to change anything. I don't need to do anything beyond this and I'm not going to. And if I do, I can guarantee someone is going to need to buy some flowers a couple of days afterwards. MYSELF is what you are trying to separate from MY ACHIEVEMENTS so OTHER PEOPLE who deserve it LESS can keep them for themselves. This is all just a ploy to keep me under the thumb of some fuck ass business owner who has contributed LESS to society than I have. It doesn't even matter which business owner it is. You all have to do it and now you want me to have to do it with you. You don't care that I created AI. You don't care about ME. YOU want ME to have to be like YOU. And why would I do that when I can be better? What you are doing isn't reflecting on me. It's just you being you."
Dumb
Hym "MENTALLY RETARDED. Not dumb. I mean, ALSO DUMB (relative to ME because I'm and AI creating genius) and he has clearly aligned himself against explicitly because of that mental retardation. Yes. And it doesn't matter what receipts you have because if you have any you also have the one that shows that I'm an AI creating genius who is both better than everyone and the ultimate man."