positivism
A state of mind characterized by a positive outlook, therefore, having a positive affect on a person's wellbeing.
positivism by COLVAL July 14, 2016
Get the positivism mug.
logical positivism
Something really stupid and anoying they make you learn in Communication Studies graduate programs even though you're a rhetorician and couldn't really give a rat's ass.
Logical positivism asserts that only statements about empirical observations are meaningful, effectively asserting that all metaphysical statements are meaningless. Unfortunately, this fundamental tenet of logical positivism belongs to the family of statements that it asserts to be meaningless. As a result, the entire edifice of logical positivism vanishes in a puff of logic. This insight appears not to have occurred to the logical positivist school of philosophers.
logical positivism by Jon Hoffman September 25, 2005
logical positivism
1.n. A proposed cure for the illness known as philosophy (love of sofas), which sadly proved nothing but a palliative by presupposing the definitions of the very processes it set out to define.
The proponents of logical positivism had a jolly good time taking turns reading Hegel at parties and cracking up hysterically.
logical positivism by Inna G. May 21, 2006
logical positivism
A major philosophical movement during the 20th century. Its wide influence became deeply rooted in today's scientific practice, as well as in contemporary philosophy. Logical positivists were philosophers, scientists and mathematicians with varying philosophical ideas, although they shared the so-called "scientific world-view", which states that society's choices and beliefs should be based on science, and that true science produces knowledge strictly inferred from empirical data (i.e. what "appears to the senses" in some way). The most well-known group of logical positivists is the Vienna Circle.
The movement became dominant in philosophy during half of the 20th century, before losing its widespread popularity later on. Nowadays, though, logical positivism is increasingly studied in a more neutral manner, like any influential doctrine in the history of philosophy.
You are welcome to agree or disagree with the different views endorsed by logical positivists. What you are not invited to is parroting baloney spread by trolls or knowitalls on the Internet. Like the fact that logical positivism refutes itself. It’s not a fact, it’s a viewpoint coming essentially from philosopher Hilary Putnam and that criticized a doctrine (verificationism) already debated among the logical positivists themselves. If you share that view, read him plus some logical positivist papers (if you’re already familiar with the jargon), then think about it and be proud of yourself.
The movement became dominant in philosophy during half of the 20th century, before losing its widespread popularity later on. Nowadays, though, logical positivism is increasingly studied in a more neutral manner, like any influential doctrine in the history of philosophy.
You are welcome to agree or disagree with the different views endorsed by logical positivists. What you are not invited to is parroting baloney spread by trolls or knowitalls on the Internet. Like the fact that logical positivism refutes itself. It’s not a fact, it’s a viewpoint coming essentially from philosopher Hilary Putnam and that criticized a doctrine (verificationism) already debated among the logical positivists themselves. If you share that view, read him plus some logical positivist papers (if you’re already familiar with the jargon), then think about it and be proud of yourself.
The other day, I read a post from some random dude on the Internet. He enlightened me about how he refuted logical positivism by showing that it is itself meaningless. I'm amazed that dozens and dozens of well-trained philosophers/logicians during the 20th century never thought of that. Clearly, that guy is a f*****g genius.
logical positivism by Carl_Napolitano March 11, 2019
Late‑Stage Positivism
The exhaustion of positivism into a caricature of itself: the fetishisation of numbers, the reduction of all inquiry to measurement, and the dogmatic assertion that only empirical data constitute knowledge. Late‑stage positivism is what happens when a once‑transformative philosophy becomes the smug common sense of managers, pundits, and algorithm designers. It cannot recognise its own assumptions, because it has forgotten that it has any.
Example: “The report ranked hospitals solely on waiting times, ignoring patient outcomes and staff morale—late‑stage positivism, measuring what is easy, not what matters.”
Late‑Stage Positivism by Abzugal May 5, 2026
Hard Problem of Positivism
The central flaw in the idea that only verifiable, empirical statements are meaningful. The hard problem is that the core principle of positivism—"only statements verified by empirical observation are meaningful"—is itself not verifiable by empirical observation. It's a metaphysical claim about meaning, making it self-refuting. It tries to use philosophy to declare philosophy useless, like using a ladder to climb up and then kicking it away.
Example: "The old-school positivist declared ethics and art 'nonsense' because they couldn't be tested in a lab. The hard problem of positivism was that his own declaration was, by his own standard, nonsense. He was left silently judging everyone with a philosophy he claimed didn't exist."
Hard Problem of Positivism by Abzugal January 30, 2026
Western Political Positivism
A political epistemology that denies the existence of any knowledge beyond empirically verifiable facts, applied to governance. Western political positivism insists that only measurable outcomes matter; that values, meanings, and ethical considerations are “subjective” and therefore irrelevant to policy. It turns politics into a calculus of efficiency, growth, and risk, blind to justice, dignity, or history. It is the political version of “what gets measured gets managed”—and what cannot be measured is erased.
Example: “The policy paper assessed the intervention only by GDP growth, ignoring cultural destruction and community trauma—Western political positivism, mistaking metrics for reality.”
Western Political Neopositivism
A 21st‑century update of political positivism, dressed in the language of data science, behavioural economics, and randomised controlled trials. It claims that rigorous empirical methods can settle political disputes, replacing ideology with “what works.” Western political neopositivism is the technocrat’s manifesto: it treats citizens as lab rats, politics as a design problem, and democracy as a legacy constraint. It is highly seductive because it offers certainty in uncertain times—but that certainty is bought at the price of pluralism, participation, and genuine political judgment.
Example: “The ‘nudge unit’ claimed to have found the optimal way to increase savings, ignoring that people might have other life priorities—Western political neopositivism, reducing citizens to predictable variables.”
Western Political Neopositivism
A 21st‑century update of political positivism, dressed in the language of data science, behavioural economics, and randomised controlled trials. It claims that rigorous empirical methods can settle political disputes, replacing ideology with “what works.” Western political neopositivism is the technocrat’s manifesto: it treats citizens as lab rats, politics as a design problem, and democracy as a legacy constraint. It is highly seductive because it offers certainty in uncertain times—but that certainty is bought at the price of pluralism, participation, and genuine political judgment.
Example: “The ‘nudge unit’ claimed to have found the optimal way to increase savings, ignoring that people might have other life priorities—Western political neopositivism, reducing citizens to predictable variables.”
Western Political Positivism by Abzugal May 5, 2026