You can't reject presuppositionalism

Or no one can provide evidence for anything ever.

Hym "You can't reject presuppositionalism and require evidence because at some point you AT LESS have to presuppose that you exist in a place where evidence translates to or is indicative of whether or not something is real. You also can't claim an epistemological nihilism because YOU KNOW for a fact that ME putting a bullet in your head CAN'T NOT alter your experience of reality in a definitive manner. I mean, assuming that it kills you. This is why the Atheist's nebulous non-postion is just a byproduct of their own deconstruction from the religion. It's just them saying 'Welp, my religion isn't real so now I can't know anything!' And is just an offshoot of 'If God isn't real than anything is permitted!' And is not reflective of a coherent conception of reality that somehow supercedes that of the religious person. I mean, you presuppose that the things that HAVE met your burden of proof have done so by meeting some evidentiary threshold, the existence of which, you presuppose."

You can't reject presuppositionalism by Hym Iam September 13, 2026