A logical fallacy and rhetorical strategy where an opponent's position is dismissed as "pseudoscience" based on political, ideological, lobbyist, or economic criteria that have superseded purely scientific evaluation. The term is a blend of "pseudoscience" and "Bulverism" (the fallacy of assuming an opponent is wrong and then explaining their error). Instead of engaging with the argument's substance, the Pseuverist attacks the motive, framing any dissenting or counter-hegemonic view as inherently unscientific and unworthy of discussion. It's a potent silencing tactic used to protect dominant paradigms by weaponizing the authority of "Science" as a social institution against critiques of the system itself.
Example: "When the economist presented data showing the ecological costs of endless GDP growth, he was hit with Pseuverism. The think-tank representative didn't address the models; he said, 'That's just degrowth pseudoscience rooted in anti-capitalist ideology.' The argument was dismissed not on its numbers, but on its perceived political alignment with dissent."
by Nammugal January 30, 2026
Get the Pseuverism mug.