a.) The term the United States’ “Idiot in Chief” uses for global climate change.
b.) Incorrect spelling for “global warming” used only by dumbasses who don’t believe in science.
c.) “a change in global or regional climate patterns... attributed largely to the increased levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide produced by the use of fossil fuels.”
Trump: Record low temperatures prove Global Waming is fake news!
Smart People: There’s a difference between weather and global climate change...
when fossil fuels are burned from cars and other gas using vehicles. Since carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gas it causes heat by it sucks infrared radiation that causes heat and makes it so it is hard for the sun rays to escape.
Dude all this global warming is going to make polar bears extinct.
A small group of people who say that there is no global warming.Which is similar to when in history the news came out that there smoking causes cancer and there was a small group of people who said it didn't and who were supported by the cigarette companies.
The world has a choice it can believe the scientific communityand work to stop it or those global warming scoffers till it's too late.
a crisis that is unique in human history where the climate is warming because of human activity. which may affect the ability to grow food and cause global starvation, mass extinction, rise of sea level, and perhaps a new ice age due to the shuting down of the thermohalene ocean current.
British slang for a scientist or technical expert, esp . when the speaker is not certain of the expert’s specific field of study. Not necessarily derogatory, but typically used by persons without a technical background. In the US, the equivalent would be “egghead”, “squint”, or “geek.”
Origin of the word is unknown. Started sometime in World War 2. Given the typical evolution of British slang, could easily have started because what these experts did was confusing or “baffling” to the common person.
According to the boffins downstairs, the murdererused a serrated blade.
When you have to pee in a movie but don’t want to miss anything, and must do the following mental equation: will the amount I have to pee cause enough discomfort to diminish my attention capacity for the remainder of the movie to an extent which is greater than the amount of the movie I would miss by making a mad dash to the restroom.
I saw Satantango last night, wonderful film but by the 5th hour I had to start doing pee calculus.